Skip to main content

Contrast Enhanced Investigations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Mammography
  • 3119 Accesses

Abstract

Sensitivity of mammography is limited especially in dense breasts [1]. Additional imaging modalities have been developed to compensate for some of the technical limitations of conventional mammography, such as lack of contrast and superimposing tissue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang CH, Nesbit DE, Fisher DR, et al. Computed tomographic mammography using a conventional body scanner. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982;138:553–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Taupitz M, et al. Use of iodine-based contrast media in digital full-field mammography–initial experience. Rofo. 2003;175:342–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith AP, Hall PA, Marcello DM. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection. Radiol Manage. 2004;26:16–24; quiz 25–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lewin JM, Niklason L. Advanced applications of digital mammography: tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Semin Roentgenol. 2007;42:243–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Diekmann F, Diekmann S, Jeunehomme F, Muller S, Hamm B, Bick U. Digital mammography using iodine-based contrast media: initial clinical experience with dynamic contrast medium enhancement. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:397–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Muller S, et al. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:W528–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dromain C, Thibault F, Muller S, et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:565–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F, et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R94.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fallenberg EM, Dromain C, Diekmann F, et al. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:256–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jochelson MS, Dershaw DD, Sung JS, et al. Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma. Radiology. 2013;266:743–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lobbes MB, Lalji U, Houwers J, et al. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients referred from the breast cancer screening programme. Eur Radiol. 2014. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3154-5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V, Larke FJ. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology. 2003;229:261–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Puong S, Bouchevreau X, Patoureaux F, Iordache R, Muller S. Dual-energy contrast enhanced digital mammography using a new approach for breast tissue cancelling. Proc SPIE Med Imaging. 2007;6510:65102H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Diekmann F, Freyer M, Diekmann S, et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78:112–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stacul F, van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, et al. Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2527–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Molen AJ, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Contrast Media Safety Committee ESoUR. Effect of iodinated contrast media on thyroid function in adults. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:902–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bellin MF, Stacul F, Webb JA, et al. Late adverse reactions to intravascular iodine based contrast media: an update. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2305–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva M. Fallenberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fallenberg, E.M. (2015). Contrast Enhanced Investigations. In: Hogg, P., Kelly, J., Mercer, C. (eds) Digital Mammography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04831-4_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04831-4_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04830-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04831-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics