Abstract
This paper explores the gap between the principles of take-back legislation and their implementation. The discussion is based on my experience with take-back legislation implementations in Europe and in the United States, as well as my research exploring the underlying economics of take-back systems on the ground. I argue that the transposition of legislative principles into working systems can lead to an array of unintended consequences, ranging from exacerbated environmental damage to uneven competitive landscapes. I illustrate these phenomena with the help of a series of economic models, and argue that the design of environmental legislation needs to carefully take into account the economics of such practices on the ground. A natural follow-up question is to what extent such legislation should define an implementation structure. Answering this question can help legislators in identifying the correct boundaries and scope of legislation they write and environmental NGOs in strategic lobbying.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alev, I., Agrawal, V., & Atasu, A. (2013). Extended producer responsibility, exports, and recycling as a secondary market strategy. Georgia Tech Working Paper.
Alev, I., Atasu, A., Ergun, O., & Toktay, B. (2013). Extended producer responsibility for pharmaceuticals. Georgia Tech Working Paper.
Atasu, A., Özdemir, Ö., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2013). Stakeholder perspectives under e-waste take-back legislation. Production and Operations Management, 22(2), 382–396.
Atasu, A., & Subramanian, R. (2012). Extended producer responsibility for e-waste: Individual or collective responsibility? Production and Operations Management, 21(6), 1042–1059.
Atasu, A., & Van Wassenhove, L. (2012). An operations perspective on product take-back legislation for e-waste: Practice, trends and research needs. Production and Operations Management, 21(3), 407–422.
Atasu, A., Van Wassenhove, L., & Sarvary, M. (2009). Efficient take-back legislation. Production and Operations Management, 18(3), 243–258.
Center for Disease Control. (2013). Policy impact: Prescription painkiller overdoses. http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreationalsafety/rxbrief/
Esenduran, G., Atasu, A., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2013). How does extended producer responsibility fare when e-waste has value? Georgia Tech Working Paper.
ETB. (2013). Electronics take back coalition. http://www.electronicstakeback.com/promote-good-laws/statelegislation
Gui, L., Atasu, A., Ergun, O., & Toktay, B. (2013a). Fair and efficient implementation of product take-back legislation with collective producer responsibility. Georgia Tech Working Paper.
Gui, L., Atasu, A., Ergun, O., & Toktay, B. (2013b). Product design or cost-efficiency? A network perspective on extended producer responsibility. Georgia Tech Working Paper.
Huang, X., Atasu, A., & Toktay, B. (2013). Design for obsolescence or recovery: The effect of take-back regulation. Georgia Tech Working Paper.
Kyle, B. (2011). E-waste export legislation is the most important action the federal government take on e-waste problem. http://www.electronicstakeback.com/2011/06/23/e-waste-export-legislation/
Lifset, R. (1993). Take it back: Extended producer responsibility as a form of incentive-base environmental policy. Resource Management Technology, 21(4), 163–175.
Lifset, R., & Lindhqvist, T. (2008). Producer responsibility at a turning point? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12(2), 144–147.
Lindhqvist, T. (2000). Extended producer responsibility in cleaner production: Policy principle to promote environmental improvements of product systems. IIIEE Dissertations 2000, 2, Lund University.
Minn. Stat. §§ 115A.1310–1330 (2007).
Pollock, A. (2012, December 6). Unused pills raise issue of disposal and risks. New York Times, p. B1.
Product Policy Institute. (2013). About EPR. http://www.productpolicy.org/content/about-epr
Responsible Electronics Recycling Act, H.R. 2284, 112th Cong. (2013).
Simons, T. E. (2010). Drug take-back programs: Safe disposal of unused, expired, or unwanted medications in North Carolina. Coastal coalition for substance abuse prevention. Technical Report, New Bern, North Carolina.
Take Back Your Meds. (2013). Why take back your meds? http://www.takebackyourmeds.org/why
The Partnership at Drugfree.org. (2013). 2011 parents and tees full report. http://www.drugfree.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/PATS-FULL-Report-FINAL-May-2-PDF-.pdf
Tojo, N. (2004). Extended producer responsibility as a driver for design change: Utopia or reality? IIIEE Dissertations 2004, 2. Lund University.
Tojo, N. (2006). EPR program for electrical and electronic equipment in Japan: Brand separation? INSEAD WEEE Directive Series Presentation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Atasu, A. (2014). An Operational Look at Take-Back Legislation. In: Cahoy, D., Colburn, J. (eds) Law and the Transition to Business Sustainability. Perspectives on Sustainable Growth. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04723-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04723-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04722-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04723-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)