New Technologies and Entrepreneurial Intention

  • Natalia Martin-CruzEmail author
  • Ana Isabel Rodriguez-Escudero
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering book series (LNMIE)


New technologies are powerful tools to create, disseminate, articulate, and exploit knowledge. Entrepreneurs use these technologies to promote the creation of new ventures. However, recent studies demonstrate that new technologies are not sufficient to enhance the process of venture creation. We use the fundamentals of the theory of planned behavior to understand the impact of new technologies on entrepreneurial intention. Empirical literature related to university students shows that entrepreneurial intention is dependent on attitudes toward entrepreneurship, social norms, and self-efficacy. We therefore evaluate an empirical model in a sample of students enrolled in the 2012–2013 academic year in the University of Valladolid (Spain).


Entrepreneurship Entrepreneurial intentions New technologies Theory of planned behavior 


  1. 1.
    Azjen I (1991) Theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes 50(2):179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azjen I (2011) The theory of planned behaviour: reactions and reflections. Psychol Health 26(9):1113–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Centre for Enterprise and Economic Development Research (2000) Young entrepreneurs, women entrepreneurs, co-entrepreneurs and ethnic minority entrepreneurs in the European Union and Central and Eastern Europe. Final Report to the European Commission, DG Enterprise, Middlesex University Business School, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choy CS, Kuppusamy J, Jusoh M (2005) Entrepreneurial careers among business graduates: match-making using theory of planned behavior. Int J Entrep 9:67–90Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cunningham JB, Lischeron J (1991) Defining entrepreneurship. J Small Bus Manage 29(1):45–61Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Engle LE, Dimitriadi N, Gavidia JV, Schlaegel C, Delanoe S, Alvarado I et al (2010) Entrepreneurial intent. Int J Entrep Behav Res 16(1):35–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fayolle A, Gailly B, Lassas-Clerc N (2006) Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: a new methodology. J Eur Ind Train 30(9):701–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Field JA, Elbert DJ, Moser SB (2012) The use of social media in building interest in wellness on a college campus. Am J Bus Educ 5(5):515–524Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hindle K, Yencken J (2004) Public research commercialisation, entrepreneurship and new technology based firms: an integrated model. Technovation 24(10):793–2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kautonena T, Van Gelderenb M Tornikoskic ET (2013) Predicting entrepreneurial behaviour: a test of the theory of planned behaviour. Appl Econ 45(6):697–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kor YY, Mahoney JT, Michael SC (2007) Resources, capabilities and entrepreneurial perceptions. J Manage Stud 44(7):1187–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krueger NF Jr, Carsrud AL (1993) Entrepreneurial intentions: applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship theory and practice. Entrep Reg Dev 5(4):315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li W (2007) Ethnic entrepreneurship: studying Chinese and Indian students in the United States. J Dev Entrep 12(4):449–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liñan F, Chen YW (2009) Development and cross-functional application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrep Theory Pract 33(3):593–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liñán F, Rodríguez-Cohard JC, Rueda JM (2011) Factors affecting entrepreneurial intention levels: a role for education. Int Entrep Manage J 7(2):195–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Martin N, Rodríguez AI, Hernangomez J, Saboia F (2009) The effect of entrepreneurship education programmes on satisfaction with innovation behaviour and performance. J Eur Ind Train 33(3):198–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Matthews CH, Moser SB (1996) A longitudinal investigation of the impact of family background and gender on interest in small firm ownership. J Small Bus Manage 34(2):29–43Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Minniti M, Nardone C (2007) Being in someone else’s shoes: the role of gender in nascent entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 28(2–3):223–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Munir KA, Phillips N (2005/1684) The birth of the ‘Kodak moment’: institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies. Organ Stud 26(11):1665–1687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rauch A, Frese M (2007) Let’s put the person back into entrepreneurship research: a meta-analysis of the relationship between business owners’ personality characteristics and business creation and success. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 16(4):353–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tushman ML, Anderson P (1986) Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Adm Sci Q 31(3):439–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Utterback JM (1994) Mastering the dynamics of innovation: how companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Veciana JM, Aponte M, Urbano D (2005) University students’ attitudes towards entrepreneurship: a two countries comparison. Int Entrep Manage J 1(2):165–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natalia Martin-Cruz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ana Isabel Rodriguez-Escudero
    • 2
  1. 1.INSISOC Research Group, Department of Business Management and MarketingBusiness School of Universidad de ValladolidValladolidSpain
  2. 2.Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Dpto. de Organización de Empresas y CIMUniversidad de ValladolidValladolidSpain

Personalised recommendations