Skip to main content

Agent-Based Modelling and Archaeological Complexity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Managing Complexity

Abstract

This paper presents a brief overview of social simulation in the field of Archaeology. It has been conducted from an agent-based modelling focus, a very interesting and valid methodology for modelling prehistoric societies. The second part of this work presents an application of this methodology in a specific model that analyses the emergence of ethnicity in a prehistoric society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All the experiments were conducted with the following parameters: N = 50; η = 2; k = 8; r = 8; pdiff = 0.8, pmut = 0.05; S0 = 0.4 and ρ = 0.5.

References

  1. Axelrod R (1997) The dissemination of culture. J Confl Resolut 41(2) 203–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Axtell RL (2000) Why agents? On the varied motivations for agent computing in the social sciences. In: Macal CM, Sallach D (eds) Proceedings of the workshop on agent simulation: applications, models, and tools. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, pp 3–24

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barceló JA (2010a) Sociedades artificiales para el análisis de procesos sociales en la prehistoria. CPAG 20:123–148

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barceló JA, Cuesta F, Del Castillo F (2010b) Simulating social, economic and political decisions in a hunter-gatherer group. The case of prehistoric Patagonia. Computer Applications in Archaeology Conference. http://www.leidenuniv.nl/caa/caa_proceedings.htm. Leiden. Accessed Feb 2013

  5. Barceló JA, Cuesta F, Del Castillo F et al (2010c) Simulating prehistoric ethnicity. The case of Patagonian hunter-gatherers. In: Contreras F, Melero M (eds) Fussion of cultures. Computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bonabeau E (2002) Agent-based modeling: methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(2):7280–7287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bousquet F, Le Page C (2004) Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review. Ecol Modell 176(3–4):313–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Christiansen J, Altaweel M (2006) Simulation of natural and social process interactions: an example from Bronze Age Mesopotamia. Soc Sci Comput Rev 24(2):209–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen AP (2000) Signifying identities: anthropological perspectives on boundaries and contested values. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. De La Cruz DE, Noriega P et al (2010) Normas en sociedades cazadoras-pesacadoras-recolectoras. Argumentos para el uso de la simulación social basada en agentes. CPAG 20:149–161

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dean JS, Gumerman GS, Epstein JE et al (2000) Understanding Anasazi culture change through agent-based modelling. In: Kohler TA, Gumerman G (eds) Dynamics in human and primate societies. Oxford University Pres, New York, pp 179–205

    Google Scholar 

  12. Del Castillo F, Barceló JA (2012) Why hunter and gatherers did not die more often? Simulating prehistoric decision making. Proceedings of the Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology Congress. Amsterdam University Press

    Google Scholar 

  13. Doran JE (1999) Prospects for agent-based modelling in archaeology. Archeologia e Calcolatori 10:33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Doran JE, Palmer M (1995a) The EOS project: integrating two models of palaeolithic social change. In Gilbert N, Conte R (eds) Artificial societies: the computer simulation of social life. UCL Press, London, pp 103–125

    Google Scholar 

  15. Doran JE, Palmer M (1995b) The EOS project: modelling prehistoric sociocultural trajectories. Proceedings of First International Symposium on Computing and Archaeology, pp 183–198

    Google Scholar 

  16. Epstein JM (1999) Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity 4(5):41–60

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Epstein JM, Axtell R (1996) Growing artificial societies: social sciences from the ground up. Brooking Institution Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gilbert N (2007) Agent based model. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gumerman G, Swedlund AC, Dean JS, Epstein JS (2003) The evolution of social behaviour in the prehistoric American Southwest. Artif Life 9(4):435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Holland JH (1998) Emergence. From chaos to order. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson CD, Kohler TA, Cowan JA (2005) Modeling historical ecology, thinking about contemporaly systems. Am Anthropol 107:96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kohler TA, Gumerman G, Reynolds RG (2005) Simulating ancient societies. Sci Am 293:77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kohler TA, Kresl J, Van West CR, Carr E, Wilshusen R (2000) Be there then: a modelling approach to settlement determinants and spatial efficiency among late ancestral pueblo populations of the Mesa Verde region, U.S. southwest. In: Kohler TA, Gumerman GJ (eds) Dynamics in human and primate societies. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 145–178

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lake MW (2000) MAGICAL computer simulation of mesolithic foraging. In: Kohler TA, Gumerman GJ (eds) Dynamics in human and primate societies. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 107–143

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wilkinson TJ, Christiansen J, Ur J et al (2007) Urbanization within a dynamic environment: modelling bronze age communities in upper Mesopotamia. Am Anthropol 109(1):52–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation Project CSD2010-00034 (SimulPast CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010) and by the Regional Government of Castile and Leon (Spain) Project VA056A12-2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Poza .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Poza, D., del Olmo, R. (2014). Agent-Based Modelling and Archaeological Complexity. In: Hernández, C., López-Paredes, A., Pérez-Ríos, J. (eds) Managing Complexity. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04705-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04705-8_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04704-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04705-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics