A “Collaborative Me” Crossroad: Individual Beliefs and the Adoption of Corporate Blogs

  • Pedro Fernández-CardadorEmail author
  • Ángel Hernández-García
  • Santiago Iglesias-Pradas
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering book series (LNMIE)


Collaboration has become an essential process to improve business performance. Firms need to enhance innovation, and this is where 2.0 collaborative tools are expected to play a key role. Corporate weblogs are one of the main 2.0 tools that have raised more interest among managers, due to their ease of use and potential to bring together employees and partners who have to collaborate in order to achieve a common goal. However, individuals’ reactions to the use of such new systems may differ, which in turn might lead to rejection of corporate blogs. Thus, the objective of this exploratory research is to study the influence of individuals’ beliefs in the adoption of corporate weblogs; more specifically, the factors discussed in this research are self-efficacy, personal outcomes expectations and anxiety. In order to assess predictive ability for the exploratory research model, we have developed a theory grounded model, which has been validated with data from 70 employees from the Information Technology department of a large industrial Spain-based company. Findings from the results show that perceived usefulness is predicted by anxiety and personal outcomes expectations, perceived ease of use is predicted by blog anxiety, and behavioral intention to use corporate blogs is predicted by perceived usefulness.


Corporate blog Technology acceptance Self-efficacy Personal outcomes expectations Computer anxiety 


  1. 1.
    Agarwal R, Karahanna E (2000) Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Q 24(4):665–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bandura A (1989) Social cognitive theory. Annals of child development, six theories of child development, vol 6. JAI, Greenwich, pp 1–60Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown S, Dennis AR, Venkatesh V (2010) Predicting collaboration technology use: integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. J Manage Inf Syst 27(2):9–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chai S, Kim M (2010) What makes bloggers share knowledge? An investigation on the role of trust. Int J Inf Manage 30(5):408–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen D, Hu N, Liu L (2007) Corporate blogging and firm performance: an empirical study. 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications. Networking and Mobile Computing, pp 6152–6155Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Compeau DR, Higgins CA (1995) Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q 19(2):189–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Compeau DR, Higgins CA, Huff SL (1999) Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Q 23(2):145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dwyer KK, Fus DA (2002) Perceptions of communication competence, self-efficacy, and trait communication apprehension: is there an impact on basic course success? Commun Res Rep 19(1):29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. J Mark Res 19(1):39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hair J-F, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hair JF, Christian M, Sarstedt M (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Mark Theory Pract 19(2):139–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heinssen RK, Glass CR, Knight LA (1987) Assessing computer anxiety: development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale. Comput Hum Behav 3:49–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hsu C, Lin J (2008) Acceptance of blog usage: the roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Inf Manage 45(1):65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Igbaria M, Iivari J (1995) The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega 23(6):587–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jackson A, Yates J, Orlikowski W (2007). Corporate blogging: building community through persistent digital talk. 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp 1530–1605Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kankanhalli A, Tan BCY, Wei K (2005) Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Q 29(1):113–143Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu X (2010) Online posting anxiety: impacts on blogging. Chin J Commun 3(2):202–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lu H-P, Hsiao K-L (2007) Understanding intention to continuously share information on weblogs. Internet Res 17(4):345–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nietzel MT, Berstein DA, Russel RL (1988) Assessment of anxiety and fear. In: Bellack AS, Herson M (eds) Behavioral assessment, a practical handbook, 3rd edn. Pergamon, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nunnally JG (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oum S, Han D (2011) An empirical study of the determinants of the intention to participate in user-created contents (UCC) services. Expert Syst Appl 38(12):15110–15121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Palen L, Grudin J (2002) Discretionary adoption of group support software. In: Munkvold BE (ed) Implementing collaboration technologies in industry: case examples and lessons learned. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Papadopoulos T, Stamati T, Nopparuch P (2013) Exploring the determinants of knowledge sharing via employee weblogs. Int J Inf Manage 33(1):133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V (2001) The collaboration continuum: understand the full goals and complexity of collaboration before moving forward. Information Week, November (22)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Riemer K, Frößler F (2007) Introducing real-time collaboration systems: development of a conceptual scheme and research directions. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 20:204–225Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A (2005) SmartPLS 2.0 (beta).
  29. 29.
    Sam H, Othman A, Nordin Z (2005) Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward the internet: a study among undergraduates. Unimas Educ Technol Soc 8(4):205–219Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wattal S, Racherla P, Mandviwalla M (2009) Employee adoption of corporate blogs: a quantitative analysis. System Sciences, 2009. HICSS ’09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference, 1–10Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yu T-K, Lu L-C, Liu T-F (2010) Exploring factors that influence knowledge sharing behavior via weblogs. Comput Hum Behav 26(1):32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro Fernández-Cardador
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ángel Hernández-García
    • 2
  • Santiago Iglesias-Pradas
    • 2
  1. 1.Universidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Ingeniería de Organización, Administración de Empresas y EstadísticaUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations