Advertisement

Information Capability in Basque Country Quality Award Winners

  • Marta Zárraga RodríguezEmail author
  • M. Jesús Álvarez
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering book series (LNMIE)

Abstract

Given the global environment that companies have to compete in nowadays, changes are so frequent that companies have to adopt a proactive attitude by trying to anticipate those changes. Using quality information while making decisions has become a critical factor for success, and nobody disputes the importance of having this quality information, which comes from the efficient use and management of information. Companies that have such quality information will have a competitive advantage and improve their results. Under the RBV theory, this efficient use and management of information could be considered a capability of a company. The aim of this paper is to explore the degree to which certain companies have developed this information capability. We focused the study on companies committed to Total Quality Management models because, due to the nature of these information intensive models, such companies can be expected to have developed information capability. The findings confirm this fact, although there are still opportunities for improvement.

Keywords

RBV Information capability Information practices EFQM 

References

  1. 1.
    Ashurst C, Doherty NF, Peppard J (2008) Improving the impact of IT development projects: the benefits realization capability model. Eur J Inf Syst 17:352–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carmichael F, Palacios-Marques D, Gil-Pechuan I (2011) How to create information management capabilities through web 2.0. Serv Ind J 31(10):1613–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choo CW, Furness C, Paquette S, van den Berg H, Detlor B, Bergeron P, Heaton L (2006) Working with information: information management and culture in a professional services organization. J Inf Sci 32(6):491–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chou T, Chan P, Cheng Y, Tsai C (2007) A path model linking organizational knowledge attributes, information processing capabilities, and perceived usability. Inf Manage 44(4):408–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coltman T, Devinney TM, Midgley DF (2010) Customer relationship management and firm performance. J Inf Technol 26(3):205–219. (This journal article is available at Research Online: http://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/768)
  6. 6.
    Fok LY, Fok WM, Hatman SJ (2001) Exploring the relationships between total quality management and information system development. Inf Manage 38:355–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gorla N, Somers TM, Wong B (2010) Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. J Strateg Inf Syst 19:207–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heras-Saizarbitoria I, Marimon F, Casadesús M (2012) An empirical study of the relationships within the categories of the EFQM model. Total Qual Manage Bus Excell 23(5–6):523–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hwang Y (2011) Measuring information behaviour performance inside a company: a case study. Inf Res 16(2), paper 480. (Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/16–2/paper480.html)
  10. 10.
    Lin S, Gao J, Koronios A, Chanana V (2007) Developing a data quality framework for asset management in engineering organizations. Int J Inf Qual 1(1):100–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marchand DA, Kettinger WJ, Rollins JD (2000) Information orientation: people, technology and the bottom line. Sloan Manage Rev 41(4):69–80Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matta K, Chen HG, Tama J (1998) The information requirements of total quality management. Total Qual Manage 9(6):445–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peppard J, Ward J (2004) Beyond strategic information systems: towards an IS capability. J Strategic Inf Syst 13:167–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sabherwal R, Chan YE (2001) Alignment between business and IS strategies: a study of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders. Inf Syst Res 12(1):11–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tee SW, Bowen PL, Doyle P, Rohde FH (2007) Factors influencing organizations to improve data quality in their information systems. Acc Financ 47:335–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang WT (2012) Evaluating organisational performance during crises: a multi-dimensional framework. Total Qual Manage Bus Excell 23(5–6):673–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISSAUniversidad de NavarraSan SebastiánSpain
  2. 2.TECNUNUniversidad de NavarraSan SebastianSpain

Personalised recommendations