Advertisement

Looking at the Future of Industrial Engineering in Europe

  • Giovanni MummoloEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering book series (LNMIE)

Abstract

The paper aims at identifying competence required to Industrial Engineers to face with current and future challenges of the EU. In order to properly address the topic, a reference framework is proposed. The framework provides a context analysis of major industrial and societal challenges which affect grand challenges as identified by the European ‘2020’ strategy. Knowledge exploitation of Key Enabling Technologies and Sustainable Urban Development are considered major industrial and societal challenges which, in turn, are significant opportunity of growth for industry. Major gaps between industry needs and competence provided by Industrial Engineering (IE) curricula are identified. A multi-university collaborative network could be the appropriate answer to bridge educational gaps and pursue a unifying view of IE in the EU, respecting educational and industrial traditions of different Countries of the European Higher Educational Area (EHEA).

Keywords

EU industrial and societal challenges IE competence gap analysis Future of industrial engineering in the EU 

References

  1. 1.
    Boenzi F, Digiesi S, Mossa G, Mummolo G, Romano VA (2013) Optimal break and job rotation schedules of high repetitive—low load, manual tasks in assembly lines: an ocra—based approach. 7th IFAC Conference on Manufacturing Modelling Management and Control. MIM 2013, Petersburg, 19–21 Sept. 2013Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    European centre for the development of vocational training (2010), Working and ageing. Emerging theories and empirical perspectives. Publication Office of the European UnionGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    EU Commission (2012) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A European strategy for key enabling technologies—a bridge to growth and jobs. COM (2012) 341Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    EU Commission (2012) Industrial revolution brings industry back to Europe. Memo 12:749Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geidl M, Koeppel G, Favre-Perrod P, Klockl B, Andersson G, Frohlich K (2007) The energy hub—a powerful concept for future energy systems. Third Annual Carnegie Mellon Conference on the Electricity Industry , 13–14 March 2007Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geng Y, Tsuyoshi F, Chen X (2010) Evaluation of innovative municipal solid waste management through urban symbiosis: a case study of Kawasaki. J Clean Prod 18:993–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    HLG (2011) KET working document, mastering and deploying key enabling technologies (KETs), building the bridge to pass across the KETs ‘Valley of Death’ for Future European Innovation and Competitiveness. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/ict/files/kets/hlg-working-document_en.pdf, access date: 9 May, 2014
  8. 8.
    IEA (2012) Urban energy policy design. http://www.iea.org/newsroomandevents/news/2012/june/name,28079,en.html, access date: 9 May, 2014
  9. 9.
    Ignone G, Mossa G, Mummolo G, Pilolli R, Ranieri L (2013) Increasing public healthcare network performance by de-hospitalization: a patient pathway perspective. Strateg Outsourcing 6:85–107. ISSN: 1753-8297Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jensson P, Byrune T, Nolan D, Norgaard B, Rokkjaer O, Schinner HD, Appold W, Polman T, Schut A, Bayard O, Areskoug M (2011) Industrial engineering standards in Europe—industry needs versus education. 1st world engineering education flash week. Lisbon 27–30 Sept. Eds Bernardino J. and Quadrado J.C.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kienzle F, Favre-Perrod P, Arnold M, Andersson G (2008) Multi-energy delivery infrastructures for the future. International Conference on Infrastructure Systems. The NL, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kienzle F, Ahcin P, Andersson A (2011) Valuing investments in multi-energy conversion, storage, and demand-side management systems under uncertainty. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 2(2):194–202Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Loch CH, Sting FJ, Bauer N, Mauermann H (March, 2010) How BMW is defusing the demographic time bomb. Harward Bus Rev 88(3):99–104Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mohammed S, Amiratb Y, Rifaic H (2012) Lower-limb movement assistance through wearable robots: state of the art and challenges. Adv Robot 26(1–2):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mummolo C, Mangialardi L, Kim JH (2013) Quantifying dynamic characteristics of human walking for comprehensive gait cycle. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering vol. 135, n. 9, pp. 091006/1-091006/10Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paci AM, Lalle C, Chiacchio MS (2013) Education for innovation: trends, collaborations and views. J Intell Manuf 24:487–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rechel B, Grundy E, Robine JM, Cylus J, Mackenbach JP, Knai C, McKee MA, 2013) Aging in the European Union. www.thelancet.com, vol 381, Issue 9874, pp. 1312–1322
  18. 18.
    Tajani A (Oct, 2012) Le città come incubatori di innovazione: politiche e tecnologie al servizio dei cittadini. Mobility Tech, MilanGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Turcu CE, Turcu CO (2013) Internet of things as key enabler for sustainable healthcare delivery. Proced—Soc Behav Sci 73:251–256Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Berkel R, Fujita T, Hashimoto S, Geng Y (2009) Industrial and urban symbiosis in Japan: analysis of the eco-town program 1997–2006. J Environ Manage 90(3):1544–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanics, Mathematics and Management, Politecnico di BariEuropean Academy for Industrial ManagementBariItaly

Personalised recommendations