Abstract
This article describes and analyzes the development of evidence-based policymaking in the Obama administration, with a particular focus on the Investing in Innovation (i3) initiative at the Department of Education. After a brief summary of the administration’s evidence-based initiatives, the authors turn to a detailed discussion of one of them (i3), a competitive grant program that awards money to conduct educational interventions. There are three award amounts (tiers). Each tier requires that applicants demonstrate a specific level of evidence of effectiveness for the proposed intervention in order to secure funding. Based on interviews with 15 individuals involved (advocates, officials at the Office of Management and Budget, congressional staff, and Department of Education officials), the authors describe the genesis, legislative passage, and enactment of i3. Particular attention is given to the challenge of developing the standards of evidence that applicants are required to meet. Arguing that the administration’s six initiatives are unique in the way that they bring evidence to the center of the policymaking process, the authors posit that the Obama administration’s effort represents a fundamental and promising shift in the funding of social welfare programs and on using strength of evidence as a major criterion in federal grantmaking.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abt Associates. (2013). Investing in innovation: Evaluating the i3 program. Abt Associates. Retrieved from http://abtassociates.com/Projects/2010/Investing-in-Innovation--Evaluating-the-i3-Program.aspx
Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods Research, 10(2), 141–168.
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (2010). Twelve major foundations commit $500 million to education innovation in concert with U.S. Department of Education’s $650 million ‘Investing in Innovation Fund.’ Retrieved from the Gates Foundation website http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2010/04/12-Foundations-Commit-to-Education-Innovation-with-US-Department-of-Education
Brill, S. (2011). Class warfare. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
Calmes, J. (2009, January 28). House passes stimulus plan with no GOP votes. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/us/politics/29obama.html?hp&_r=0
Center for National and Community Service. (2013, May). Social innovation fund: Content requirements for sub grantee evaluation plans. Washington, DC: Author.
Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (2013). Randomized controlled trials commissioned by the Institute of Education Sciences Since 2002: How many found positive versus weak or no effects. Retrieved from http://coalition4evidence.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/IES-CommissionedRCTs-positive-vs-weak-or-null-findings-7-2013.pdf
Corporation for National and Community Service. (2013, May). Social innovation fund: Content requirements for subgrantee evaluation plans.
Goodson, B., Wolf, A., Bell, S., Turner, H., Finney, P. (2010). The effectiveness of a program to accelerate vocabulary development in kindergarten (VOCAB). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southeast/pdf/REL_20104014.pdf
Herszenhorn, D. (2009, February 10). Senate approves stimulus plan. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/washington/11web-stim.html
Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Rigor and relevance redux: Director’s biennial report to congress. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/director/pdf/20096010.pdf
Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. (2011). What works clearinghouse: Procedures and standards handbook version 2.1. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_procedures_v2_1_standards_handbook.pdf
Knott, J., & Wildavsky, A. (1980). If dissemination is the solution, what is the problem? Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(4), 537–578.
Library of Congress. (a). American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Retrieved from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:h.r.00001
Library of Congress. (b). Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010. Retrieved from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:h.r.03288
Library of Congress. (c). Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011. Retrieved from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d112:h.r.1473
Library of Congress. (d). Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010. Retrieved from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:h.r.04872
Library of Congress. (e). Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Retrieved from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:h.r.03590
Library of Congress. (f). Serve America Act. Retrieved from http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:h.r.01388
Manzi, J. (2012a). Uncontrolled: The surprising payoff of trial-and-error for business, politics and society. New York: Perseus.
Manzi, J. (2012b, December). Science knowledge and freedom. Speech presented at Harvard’s Program on Constitutional Government, Cambridge, MA.
Mathematica Policy Research and Child Trends. (2010). Identifying programs that impact teen pregnancy prevention, sexually transmitted infections, and associated risk behaviors: Review protocol version 1.0. Retrieved from http://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/oah-initiatives/teen_pregnancy/db/eb-programs-review-v2.pdf
Mosteller, F. (1995). The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades. The Future of Children 5(2), 113–127. Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/futureofchildren/publications/docs/05_02_08.pdf
National Research Council. (1999). Improving student learning: A strategic plan for education research and its utilization. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=6488
Office of the Federal Register (2010, March 10). Final rule and notice. Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-03-12/pdf/2010-5147.pdf
Orr, L. L. (1998). Social experiments: Evaluating public programs with experimental methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Orszag, P. (2009, June). Building rigorous evidence to drive policy. OMBlog. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/blog/09/06/08/BuildingRigorousEvidencetoDrivePolicy
Paulsell, D., Avellar, S., Sama Martin, E., & Del Grosso, P. (2010). Home visiting evidence of effectiveness review: Executive summary. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from http://homvee.acf.hhs.gov/HomVEE_Executive_Summary.pdf
Seib, G. (2008, November 21). In crisis, opportunity for Barack Obama. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122721278056345271.html
Smith, K., & Peterson, J. (2011). Supporting and scaling change: Lessons from the first round of the investing in innovation (i3) program. Retrieved from http://bellwethereducation.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Supporting-Scaling-Change-i3.pdf
Stolberg, S. G. (2009, February 17). Signing stimulus, Obama doesn’t rule out more. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/18/us/politics/18web-stim.html
Tansey, O. (2007). Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for non-probability sampling. PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(4), 765–772.
Tuttle, C. C., Gill, B., Gleason, P., Knechtel, V., Nichols-Barrer, I., Resch, A. (2013). KIPP Middle Schools: Impacts on achievement and other outcomes. Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved from http://www.kipp.org/files/dmfile/KIPP_Middle_Schools_Impact_on_Achievement_and_Other_Outcomes1.pdf
United States Congress. (2009, January). American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Retrieved from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-111hr1enr/pdf/BILLS-111hr1enr.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haskins, R., Margolis, G. (2014). Obama’s Promise: Using Evidence to Fight the Nation’s Social Problems. In: Finnigan, K., Daly, A. (eds) Using Research Evidence in Education. Policy Implications of Research in Education, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04690-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04690-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04689-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04690-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)