Skip to main content

Thermodynamic Performance Evaluation of a Geothermal Drying System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment

Abstract

Renewable energy sources such as geothermal energy can be used in drying processes as a heat source due to the high energy costs of fossil fuels.

In this study, geothermal cabinet type dryer was constructed and situated in Balcova-Narlidere Geothermal Field, Turkey where the clean city water of district heating system is used as an energy source for the dryer. The dryer was tested on site for drying of olive leaves and energy and exergy analyses of the drying process conducted under two cases: Case 1. Exhaust air was rejected to the environment. Case 2. A portion of exhaust air was re-circulated. Energy Utilization Ratio (EUR) was determined as 7.96 for Case 1 and 50.36 for Case 2. The highest rate of exergy destruction occurred in the fan, followed by heat exchanger and the dryer, accounting for 0.2913, 0.05663 and 0.0115 kW, respectively. Exergetic efficiency of the drying chamber was calculated as 89.66 %. Re-circulating the exhaust air decreased the exergy value at the outlet of the dryer from 0.1013 to 0.08104 kW, indicating that re-using the air increases the performance of the dyer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Oztekin S, Başçetinçelik A, Soysal Y (1999) Crop drying programme in Turkey. Renew Energy 1:789–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benavente-García O, Castillo J, Lorente J, Ortuño A, Del Rio JA (2000) Antioxidant activity of phenolics extracted from Oleaeuropaea L. leaves. Food Chem 68(4):457–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouaziz M, Sayadi S (2005) Isolation and evaluation of antioxidants from leaves of a Tunisian cultivar olive tree. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 107(7–8):497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bahloul N, Boudhrioua N, Kouhila M, Kechaou N (2009) Convective solar drying of olive leaves. J Food Process Eng 34(4):1338–1362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Soysal Y, Öztekin S (2001) PH—Postharvest Technology: technical and economic performance of a tray dryer for medicinal and aromatic plants. J Agric Eng Res 79(1):73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fargali HM, Nafeh AA, Fahmy FH, Hassan MA (2008) Medicinal herb drying using a photovoltaic arrayed a solar thermal system. Solar Energy 82(12):1154–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Andritsos N, Dalampakis P, Kolios N (2003) Use of geothermal energy for tomato drying. Geo Heat Cent Q 24(1):9–13

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kumoro AC, Kristanto D (2003) Preliminary study on the utilization of geothermal energy for drying of agricultural product. In: Proceedings of the international geothermal conference, September 2003, Reykjavik

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hirunlabh J, Thiebratand S, Khedari J (2004) Chili and garlic drying by using waste heat recovery from a geothermal power plant. GHC Bull (September)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sumotarto U (2007) Design of a geothermal energy dryer for beans and grains drying in Kamojang geothermal field, Indonesia. Geo Heat Center Bull 28(1):13–18

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dincer I, Sahin AZ (2004) A new model for thermodynamic analysis of a drying process. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 47(4):645–652

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Akpinar EK, Midilli A, Bicer Y (2006) The first and second law analyses of thermodynamic of pumpkin drying process. J Food Eng 72:320–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Akbulut A, Durmuş A (2010) Energy and exergy analyses of thin layer drying of mulberry in a forced solar dryer. Energy 35(4):1754–1763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chowdhury MMI, Bala BK, Haque MA (2011) Energy and exergy analysis of the solar drying of jackfruit leather. Biosyst Eng 110(2):222–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Midilli A, Kucuk H (2003) Energy and exergy analyses of solar drying process of pistachio. Energy 28(6):539–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Colak N, Kuzgunkaya E, Hepbaşlı A (2008) Exergetic assessment of drying of mint leaves in a heat pump dryer. J Food Process Eng 31(3):281–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuzgunkaya EH, Hepbasli A (2007) Exergetic performance assessment of a ground source heat pump drying system. Int J Energy 31:760–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ozdiler U, Sayık T (2011) Balcova-Narlidere saha isletmesi. In: Jeotermal enerji semineri, Teskon, X. Ulusal Tesisat Mühendisliği Kongresi, Izmir, 13–16 April 2011

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cengel Y, Boles MA (2011) Thermodynamics: an engineering approach. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Szargut J, Morris DR, Steward FR (1988) Exergy analysis of thermal, chemical and metallurgical processes. Hemisphere Publishing Corp, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Engineering Equation Solver (EES) (2012) Commercial and professional versions. F-Chart Software, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  22. Corzo O, Bracho N, Vasquezand A, Pereira A (2008) Energy and exergy analysis of thin layer drying of coroba slices. J Food Eng 86:151–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Erbay Z, İçier F (2010) Energy and exergy analysis on drying of olive leaves (Oleaeuropaea L.) in tray drier. J Food Process Eng 34(6):2105–2123

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Izmir Jeotermal Inc. for their technical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hüseyin Utku Helvacı .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Nomenclature

Nomenclature

A:

Area (m2)

Cp :

Specific heat (kJ/kg K)

EU:

Energy utilization (kW)

EUR:

Energy utilization ratio (%)

\( {E}^{\prime }x \) :

Exergy rate (kW)

h:

Specific enthalpy (kJ/kg)

\( \dot{m} \) :

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

P:

Pressure (kPa)

\( \dot{Q} \) :

Heat rate (kW)

RH:

Relative humidity (%)

r:

Re-circulation ratio (%)

s:

Specific entropy (kJ/kg K)

T:

Temperature (°C)

V:

Velocity (m/s)

\( \dot{W} \) :

Work rate (kW)

ρ:

Density (kg/m3)

ψ:

Specific exergy (kJ/kg)

ε:

Exergetic efficiency (%)

ω :

Specific humidity ratio (kg water/kg air)

da:

Drying air

dc:

Drying chamber

des:

Destroyed

env:

Environment

He:

Heat exchanger

in:

Inlet, inflow

out:

Outlet, outflow

re:

Re-circulated

sat:

Saturated

0:

Dead (reference) state

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Helvacı, H.U., Akkurt, G.G. (2014). Thermodynamic Performance Evaluation of a Geothermal Drying System. In: Dincer, I., Midilli, A., Kucuk, H. (eds) Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04680-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04681-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics