Abstract
The assessment of energy and exergy efficiencies is conducted on a crude oil distillation system for three different cases. Each case defines efficiency in a unique way with different inputs and outputs. First case treats the heat transfer rate as useful output and the heat gained from the heaters as input. For the second case, we consider the heat provided by the heaters as input and the heat transfer rate in the distillation system as output. The third case treats the heat provided by the heaters as input and heat transfer rate along with the heat of exhaust gases as useful output. The system efficiencies are studied parametrically by changing the amount of heat transfer rate and the ambient temperatures. The results show that case 1 has the baseline energy and exergy efficiencies at 53 % and 25.3 % respectively. Case 2 has the efficiencies at 40 % for energy and 23.3 % for exergy efficiency. Case 3 efficiencies are at 72 % for energy while exergy efficiency is at 65 %. Case 1 has the highest efficiencies, followed by case 3 then the least efficient is case 2. Utilizing the unused energy, as a useful input to some other system, improves the overall efficiency of the plant and saves operating cost while making the system more environmentally friendly.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rosen MA, Dincer I (1997) On exergy and environmental impact. Int J Energy Res 21:643–654
Al-Muslim H, Dincer I, Zubair SM (2003) Exergy analysis of single and two-stage crude oil distillation units. ASME J Energy Resour Technol 12:199–207
Kanoglu M, Dincer I, Rosen MA (2007) Understanding energy and exergy efficiencies for improved energy management in power plants. Energy Policy 35:3967–3978
Cengel YA, Boles MA (2006) Thermodynamics: an engineering approach, 5th edn. New York, McGraw-Hill
Farooque AM et al (2008) Parametric analyses of energy consumption and losses in SWCC SWRO plants utilizing energy recovery devices. Desalination 219:137–159
Talbi M, Agnew B (2002) Energy recovery from diesel engine exhaust gases for performance enhancement and air conditioning. Appl Therm Eng 22:693–702
Bagajewicz M, Ji S (2001) Rigorous procedure for the design of conventional atmospheric crude fractionation units. Part I: targeting. Ind Eng Chem Res 40:617–626
Errico M, Tola G, Mascia M (2009) Energy saving in a crude distillation unit by a preflash implementation. Appl Therm Eng 29:1642–1647
Dincer I, Rosen M (2007) EXERGY energy, environment and sustainable development. Elsevier, London
Al-Muslim H, Dincer I, Zubair SM (2005) Effect of reference state on exergy efficiencies of one- and two-stage crude oil distillation plants. Int J Therm Sci 44:65–73
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Nomenclature
Nomenclature
- ADU:
-
Atmospheric distillation unit
- \( \dot{\mathrm{E}} \) :
-
Energy rate, W
- \( \dot{\mathrm{E}}\mathrm{x} \) :
-
Exergy rate, W
- \( \dot{\mathrm{I}} \) :
-
Exergy destruction rate
- PA:
-
Pump-around circuit
- \( \dot{\mathrm{Q}}{\operatorname{}}_{\mathrm{CV}} \) :
-
Heat rate consumed in the distillation system, W
- T:
-
Temperature, K
- T0 :
-
Ambient temperature, K
- VDU:
-
Vacuum distillation unit
- η:
-
Energy efficiency
- Ψ:
-
Exergy efficiency
- 1–17:
-
States
- C:
-
Case for efficiencies
- H:
-
Heater
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zafar, S., Dincer, I. (2014). Efficiency Assessment of Crude Oil Distillation Systems. In: Dincer, I., Midilli, A., Kucuk, H. (eds) Progress in Exergy, Energy, and the Environment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04681-5_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04680-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04681-5
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)