While the rising trend of research in robotic fabrication has furthered the development of parametric or mass-customization concepts in architecture, the majority of these projects are still cut or assembled from standardized blocks of material. Although the use of nonstandard, ‘found’ components provides an additional layer of complexity and constraint to the design/fabrication process, it can compensate for these challenges by enabling more sustainable material practices and the production of unique objects that cannot be reproduced. In this chapter, we illustrate a materially efficient technique for designing and fabricating freeform surfaces within the constraints of irregular wood flitches. The process utilizes a robotically operated bandsaw to cut a series of curved strips which, when rotated and laminated, can approximate doubly-curved and digitally defined geometry. By delimiting the design space by both the ‘machinic morphospace’ (Menges in Rob|Arch 2012: Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Industrial Design, Springer, Vienna, pp. 28–47, 2012) of the fabrication technique and the naturally defined curvatures and constraints of the flitch, the customized control software and machining processes confer the capabilities of digital fabrication onto materially tailored and operator-informed woodcraft.
KeywordsRobotic bandsaw Freeform surface Timber construction Parametric design Minimal waste
Many thanks to Axel Kilian for his support during the early phases of this research.
- Bonwetsch T, Gramazio F, Kohler M (2006) The informed wall: applying additive digital fabrication techniques on architecture. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the association for computer-aided design in architecture, Louisville, Kentucky, pp 489–495Google Scholar
- Brell-Cokcan et al (2009) Digital design to digital production: flank milling with a 7-axis CNC-milling robot and parametric design. In: Proceedings of the eCAADe conference, Istanbul, Turkey, pp 323–330Google Scholar
- Conners et al (1983) Identifying and locating surface defects in wood: part of an automated lumber processing system. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 5(6):573–583Google Scholar
- Decker AK (1928) Nesting furniture. US Patent 1660119A, Filed 24 Oct 1925, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
- Enns J (2010) Beauty’s found geometries. M. Arch thesis, Princeton University (Advisor: Prof. Axel Kilian)Google Scholar
- Johns R (2014) Augmented materiality: modelling with material indeterminacy. In: Gramazio F, Kohler M, Langenberg S (eds) Fabricate. gta Verlag, Zurich, pp 216–223Google Scholar
- Kim V, Li W, Mitra N, DiVerdi S, Funkhouser T (2012) Exploring collections of 3D models using fuzzy correspondences. ACM Trans Graph (Proc SIGGRAPH) Google Scholar
- Kolarevic B (ed) (2003) Architecture in the digital age: design and manufacturing. Spon Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Loeffen M, Purnell G (2006) Automation for the modern slaughterhouse. In: Nollet L, Toldrá F (eds) Advanced technologies for meat processing. CRC/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 43–71Google Scholar
- McCullough M (1996) Abstracting craft: the practiced digital hand. MIT Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
- McGee A, Feringa J, Søndergaard A (2012) Processes for an architecture of volume: robotic hot wire cutting. In: Rob|Arch 2012: robotic fabrication in architecture, art and industrial design (2013). Springer, Vienna, pp 28–47Google Scholar
- Menges A (2012) Morphospaces of robotic fabrication: from theoretical morphology to design computation and digital fabrication in architecture. In: Rob|Arch 2012: robotic fabrication in architecture, art and industrial design (2013). Springer, Vienna, pp 28–47Google Scholar
- Oesterle S (2009) Cultural performance in robotic timber construction. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the association for computer aided design in architecture (ACADIA), Chicago, pp 194–200Google Scholar