Advertisement

Experiments in Additive Clay Depositions

Woven Clay
  • Jared FriedmanEmail author
  • Heamin Kim
  • Olga Mesa
Chapter

Abstract

The Standard definitions and models of additive manufacturing, such as those outlined by ASTM (2012), often assume a layer-by-layer deposition of a material onto a flat surface. The research presented looks to explore what alternative formal opportunities that may arise when challenging these assumptions concerning additive manufacturing. Beginning with the robotic clay coil extrusion process, the research uses a bottom–up approach that asks what types of forms and scales can be generated with this process. Prototypes incorporate techniques such as weaving as a means of fabricating panels that celebrate the inherent nature of the coil itself. The woven patterns are designed to incorporate both assembly logics and performance qualities such as light permeability across a façade component. Through a series of full-scale prototypes focusing on a specific building application, this research works to resolve the seemingly conflicting nature between the inherent mutability of the clay material and the high level of control granted by robotic fabrication processes.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Ceramics Clay deposition Weaving 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted under the guidance of instructors Nathan King and Rachel Vroman during the course: Material Systems: Digital Design, Fabrication, and Research Methods at the Harvard University Graduate School of Design; Cambridge MA; Fall 2013.

Research supported by ASCER Tile of Spain; Harvard University Graduate School of Design, Design Robotics Group; the Office for the Arts at Harvard, Ceramics Program; and the Harvard Graduate School of Design, Fabrication Laboratory.

References

  1. ASTM (2012) F2792-12a Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PAGoogle Scholar
  2. Bechthold M, King N, Kane A, Niemasz J, Reinhart C (2011) Integrated environmental design and robotic fabrication workflow for ceramic shading systems. In: Proceedings of the 28th international symposium on automation and robotics in construction. Seoul, KoreaGoogle Scholar
  3. Lazcano J (2008) Ceramics in the Alhambra: petrified water. Essays Archit Ceram 4:67–77Google Scholar
  4. King N, Bechthold M, Kane A (2011) Customizing ceramics: automation strategies for robotic fabrication. Pending Publication, Digital Futures Tongji University PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Koshnevis B (2001) Experimental investigation of contour crafting using ceramic materials. Rapid Prototyp J 7(1):32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Semper G (1851) 1989 The fours elements of architecture'. In: The four elements of architecture and other writings. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Semper G (1862) 1989 Style in the technical and tectonic arts or practical aesthetics'. In: The four elements of architecture and other writings. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Spuybroek L (2011) Textile tectonics. NAi Publishers, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. Peterson S, Peterson J (2003) Craft and the art of clay: a complete potter’s handbook, 4th edn. Lawrence King Publishing Ltd., London, pp 33–34Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Harvard Graduate School of DesignCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations