Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Funda AtunEmail author
Chapter
  • 640 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

This chapter sets the way towards resilience, and covers discussion and conclusion sub-sections. The discussion part comprises relationships among results and generalizations. Besides, new observations, new interpretations, and new insights that have resulting from the research are given in the conclusion sub-section.

Keywords

Disaster resilience London Transportation system 

References

  1. Hale A, Heijer T (2006) Is resilience really necessary? the case of railways. In: Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (eds) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, HampshireGoogle Scholar
  2. Hollnagel E (2006) Resilience the challenge of the unstable. In: Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N. (eds) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, HampshireGoogle Scholar
  3. Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N (eds) (2006) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, HampshireGoogle Scholar
  4. Mitroff I (1974) On systemic problem solving and the error of the third kind. Behav Sci 19(6):383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Architecture and Urban StudiesPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations