Skip to main content

Abstract

Drivers routing decisions can be influenced to minimize environmental impacts by using, for instance, dynamic and intelligent road pricing schemes. However, some previous research studies have shown that often different pollutants can dictate different traffic assignment strategies which makes necessary to assign weights to these pollutants so they become comparable. In this chapter, a tool for traffic assignment taking into account eco-routing purposes is presented. The main goal of this work is to identify the best traffic volume distribution that allows a minimization of environmental costs for a given corridor with predetermined different alternative routes. To achieve this, an integrated numerical computing platform was developed by integrating microscopic traffic and emission models. The optimization tool employs non-linear techniques to perform different traffic assignment methods: User Equilibrium (UE), System Optimum (SO) and System Equitable (SE). For each method, different strategies can be assessed considering: (i) individual pollutants and traffic performance criteria; and (ii) all pollutants simultaneously. For the latter case, three different optimization approaches can be assessed based on: (i) economic costs of pollutants once released into the air; (ii) human health impacts according to the Eco-Indicator 99; and (iii) real time atmospheric pollutant concentration levels. The model was applied to a simple network, simulating three levels of traffic demand and three different strategies for traffic assignment. The system is developed in Microsoft Excel and offers a user friendly access to optimization algorithms by including a dynamic user interface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Environmental Agency—EEA: The contribution of transport to air quality—TERM 2012. EEA European Environment Agency, Copenhagen (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. European Commission: White paper Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area—Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system. COM (2011) 144 final, Brussels (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yin, Y., Lawphongpanich, S.: Internalizing emission externality on road networks. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 11, 292–301 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma, S., Mishra, S.: Intelligent transportation systems-enabled optimal emission pricing models for reducing carbon footprints in a bimodal network. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17, 54–64 (2013). doi:10.1080/15472450.2012.708618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bandeira, J.M., Carvalho, D.O., Khattak, A.J., et al.: A comparative empirical analysis of eco-friendly routes during peak and off-peak hours. 91st Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bandeira, J.M., Almeida, T.G., Khattak, A.J., et al.: Generating emissions information for route selection: experimental monitoring and routes characterization. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17, 3–17 (2013). doi:10.1080/15472450.2012.706197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barth, M., Boriboonsomsin, K., Vu, A: Environmentally-friendly navigation. Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 684–689 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ahn, K.G., Rakha, H.: The effects of route choice decisions on vehicle energy consumption and emissions. Transp. Res. Part D-Transp. Environ. 13, 151–167 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.trd.2008.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yao, E., Song, Y.: Study on eco-route planning algorithm and environmental impact assessment. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17, 42–53 (2013). doi:10.1080/15472450.2013.747822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gazis, A., Fontes, T., Bandeira, J., et al.: Integrated computational methods for traffic emissions route assessment. Fifth ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Computational Transportation Science (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guo, L., Huang, S., Sadek, A.W.: An evaluation of environmental benefits of time-dependent green routing in the greater buffalo-niagara region. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17, 18–30 (2013). doi:10.1080/15472450.2012.704336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahn, K., Rakha, H., Moran, K.: System-wide impacts of eco-routing strategies on large-scale networks. 91st Annual meeting of the transportation research board (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. DOT US: Applications for the environment: real-time information synthesis (AERIS)—benefit-cost analysis (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bureau of Public Roads: Traffic assignment manual. Washington DC (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Spiess, H.: Conical volume-delay functions. Transp. Sci. 24 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goedkoop, M., Spriensma, R.: The eco-indicator 99—a damage oriented method for life cycle assessment. Methodology Report (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rilett, L., Benedek, C.: Traffic assignment under environmental and equity objectives. Transp. Res. Rec. 1443, 92–99 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lasdon, L.S., Waren, A.D., Jain, A., Ratner, M.: Design and testing of a generalized reduced gradient code for nonlinear programming. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 4, 34–50 (1978). doi:10.1145/355769.355773

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Frontline Systems Inc.: Basic solver—nonlinear optimization. http://www.solver.com/content/basic-solver-nonlinear-optimization (2013)

  20. PTV.: Vissim 5.30-05 user manual. Planung Transport Verkehr AG, Karlsruhe, German (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fontes, T., Fernandes, P., Rodrigues, H., et al.: Are eco-lanes a sustainable option to reducing emissions in a medium-sized European city? 92nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington DC, January 2013

    Google Scholar 

  22. US Environmental Protection Agency—EPA: Methodology for developing modal emission rates for epa’s multi-scale motor vehicle and equipment emission system. Prepared by North Carolina State University for US Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Coelho, M.C., Frey, H.C., Rouphail, N.M., et al.: Assessing methods for comparing emissions from gasoline and diesel light-duty vehicles based on microscale measurements. Transp. Res. Part D-Transp. Environ. 14, 91–99 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.trd.2008.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhai, H., Frey, H.C., Rouphail, N.M.: A vehicle-specific power approach to speed- and facility-specific emissions estimates for diesel transit buses. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 7985–7991 (2008). doi:10.1021/es800208d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. European Environment Agency—EEA: EMEP EEA Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook 2010–2011 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. ACAP: Automobile Industry Statistics 2010 Edn. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dejong, K., Spears, W.M.: An analysis of the interacting roles of population size and crossover in genetic function optimization. Proceedings of Parallel Problem Solving from Nature. Berlin, pp. 38–47 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sadek, A.W., Smith, B.L., Demetsk, M.J.: Dynamic traffic assignment genetic algorithms approach. Transp. Res. Rec.1588 Pap. 1588, 95–103 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Bandeira and P. Fernandes acknowledge the support of the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation—FCT for the Doctoral grants SFRH/BD/66104/2009 and SFRH/BD/87402/2012. This work was partially funded by FEDER Funds through the Operational Program ‘‘Factores de Competitividade COMPETE’’ and by National Funds through FCT within the project PTDC/SEN-TRA/115117/2009. The authors also acknowledge the Strategic Project PEst-C/EME/UI0481/2013 and Toyota Caetano Portugal, which allowed the use of vehicles. We are thankful to the US Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration for providing funding through the TranLIVE consortium of university transportation centers." The collaboration between Drs. Coelho and Khattak was under the auspices of the Luso-American Transportations Impacts Study Group (LATIS-G). The contents of this article reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tânia Fontes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bandeira, J.M., Pereira, S.R., Fontes, T., Fernandes, P., Khattak, A.J., Coelho, M.C. (2014). An Eco-Traffic Management Tool. In: de Sousa, J., Rossi, R. (eds) Computer-based Modelling and Optimization in Transportation. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 262. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04630-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04630-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04629-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04630-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics