Abstract
This chapter is about evaluation in the creation and experience of interactive art and its implications for practitioner research methodologies. Central to the need for evaluation is the transformative nature of experience in art and the way that the advent of interactivity in the digital age has changed the audience from viewer to a new kind of participant. This has given rise to opportunities for exploring interactive experience in a creative context, one that has been recognised by researchers and art practitioners alike. Although evaluation in the service of art practice is an unfamiliar notion to many, there is no doubt that in respect of evaluation and art experience, the boundaries of what is possible are being extended in interactive art development. In Practice Based Research and Human Computer Interaction new opportunities are arising that bridge the interests of digital art and interaction design. A framework for evaluating interactive art development and experience is presented followed by discussion of the approaches and methods represented in the following chapters of the book. These approaches illustrate the diversity to be found in interactive arts evaluation processes, from documented reflective practice to evidence based methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alarcon-Diaz X, Askaroff K, Candy L, Edmonds EA, Faram J, Hobson G (2014) In: Candy L, Ferguson S (eds) Interactive experience in the digital Age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, London, pp 187–208
Arts Council of England (2013) http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/selfevaluation/. Accessed 9 June 2013
Bengler B, Bryan Kinns N (2014) In the wild: evaluating collaborative interactive musical experiences in public settings. In: Candy L, Ferguson S (eds) Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, London, pp 169–186
Bilda Z (2011) Designing for audience engagement. In: Candy L, Edmonds EA (eds) Interacting: art, research and the creative practitioner. Libri Publishing Ltd., Faringdon, pp 163–181
Bilda Z, Candy L, Edmonds EA (2008) Designing for creative engagement. Interact Desig Creat Pract (special issue Design Studies) 29(6):525–540, Elsevier
Boden MA (1990) The creative mind: myths and mechanisms. George Weidenfeld & Nicolson Ltd., London
Burraston D (2011) Creativity, complexity and reflective practice. In: Candy L, Edmonds EA (eds) Interacting: art, research and the creative practitioner. Libri Publishing Ltd., Faringdon, pp 33–59
Candy L (2011) Research and creative practice. In: Candy L, Edmonds EA (eds) Interacting: art, research and the creative practitioner. Libri Publishing Ltd., Faringdon, pp 33–59
Candy L (2012) Evaluating creativity. In: Carroll JM (ed) Creativity and rationale: enhancing human experience by design. Springer, London, pp 57–84
Candy L, Edmonds EA (2002) Explorations in art and technology. Springer, London
Candy L, Edmonds EA (2010) The role of the artefact and frameworks for practice-based research. In: Biggs M, Larsson H (eds) The Routledge companion to research in the arts. Routledge, New York, pp 120–137
Candy L, Edmonds EA (eds) (2011) Interacting: art, research and the creative practitioner. Libri Publishing Ltd, Faringdon
Cockton G (2008) Revisiting usability’s three key principles. In: Proceedings of the CHI08 extended abstracts. ACM Press, New York
Costello B (2007) A pleasure framework. Leonardo 40(4):370–371
Costello B (2011) Many voices, one project. In: Candy L, Edmonds EA (eds) Interacting: art, research and the creative practitioner. Libri Publishing Ltd., Faringdon, pp 182–194
Costello B, Muller L, Amitani S, Edmonds EA (2005) Understanding the experience of interactive art, iamascope in beta_space. In: Pisan Y (ed) Proceedings interactive entertainment. Creativity & Cognition Studios Press, Sydney, pp 49–56
Crabtree A (2003) Designing collaborative systems: a practical guide to ethnography. Springer, Heidelberg
Dewey J (1934) Art as experience. Capricorn Books, Paragon, New York, 1959
Eco U (1989) The open work. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. First published in 1962 as Opera Aperta
Edmonds EA (2010) The art of interaction. Digit Creat 21(4):257–264
Edmonds EA (2011a) Interactive art. In: Candy L, Edmonds EA (eds) Interacting: art, research and the creative practitioner. Libri Publishing Ltd., Faringdon, pp 18–32
Edmonds EA (2011b) Art, interaction and engagement. In: Candy L, Edmonds EA (eds) Interacting: art, research and the creative practitioner. Libri Publishing Ltd., Faringdon, pp 228–241
Edmonds EA (2014) Human computer interaction, experience and art. In: Candy L, Ferguson S (eds) Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, London, pp 11–23
Edmonds EA, Candy L (2010) Relating theory, practice and evaluation in practitioner research. Leonardo J 43(5):470–476
Galenson D (2007) Old masters and young geniuses. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Graham B, Cook S (2010) Rethinking curating: art after new media. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Greenberg S, Buxton B (2008) Usability evaluation considered harmful (Some of the time). In: Proceedings of the CHI2008. ACM Press, New York
Harker S (1995) The development of ergonomic standards for software. Appl Ergon 26(4):275–279
Harris C (1999) Art and innovation: the Xerox PARC artist-in-residence program, Leonardo book series. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Hassenzahl M (2004) The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Hum Comput Interact 19(4):311–318
IXIA (2013) Public art: a guide to evaluation, IXIA PA limited. http://ixia-info.com/research/evaluation/. Accessed 28 Nov 2013
Johnston A (2014) Keeping research in tune with practice. In: Candy L, Ferguson S (eds) Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, London, pp 49–62
Jordan PW (2000) Designing pleasurable products. Taylor & Francis, London
Kuh K (1962) The artist’s voice. Da Capo Press, New York (January 14, 2000)
Latulipe C (2013) The value of research in creativity and the arts. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Creativity & Cognition. ACM Press, New York, pp 1–10
Loke L, Khut GP (2014) Intimate aesthetics and facilitated interaction. In: Candy L, Ferguson S (eds) Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, London, pp 91–108
Muller L (2011) Learning from experience – a reflective curatorial practice. In: Candy L, Edmonds EA (eds) Interacting: art, research and the creative practitioner. Libri Publishing Ltd., Faringdon, pp 94–106
Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H (eds) (2002) Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Wiley, New York
Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York and reprinted Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot, Hants, 1991, 2003
Sommerer C, Mignonneau L (2009) Interactive art research. Springer, Wien/New York
Sternberg R (1999) Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Sullivan G (2010) Art practice as research: inquiry in the visual arts, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Sweeney M, Maguire M, Shackel B (1993) Evaluating user-computer interaction: a framework. Int J Man Mach Stud 38(4):689–711. Academic Press
Tractinsky N, Adi SK, Ikar D (2000) What is beautiful is usable. Interact Comput 13(2):127–145
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Candy, L. (2014). Evaluation and Experience in Art. In: Candy, L., Ferguson, S. (eds) Interactive Experience in the Digital Age. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04510-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04510-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04509-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04510-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)