Skip to main content

In the Wild: Evaluating Collaborative Interactive Musical Experiences in Public Settings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Cultural Computing ((SSCC))

Abstract

This chapter describes a mixed-method approach that was adopted for evaluating the audience interaction with a collaborative interactive music system entitled Polymetros. Designed for broad audiences, Polymetros aims to enable users without formal musical training to experience collaborative music making. The presented approach aims to cater for audience evaluations that take place in the real-world context of a public exhibition and was applied to a study conducted in the Victoria and Albert Museum in London. Besides reflecting on general motivations for adopting and combining different methods to assess technology-mediated public creativity, the main focus of this chapter is to provide a detailed account of how the specific contextual demands and particular evaluation objectives of the reported study were incorporated into the methodological approach. After summarising the study results, several interesting links between findings derived from using different methods are examined indicating the value of triangulation. This leads to a discussion how a bespoke mixed-method approach can contribute to the understanding of such a complex, interactive multi-user scenario in public settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alarcon-Diaz X, Askaroff K, Candy L, Edmonds EA, Faram J, Hobson G (2014) In: Candy L, Ferguson S (eds) Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, London, pp 187–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengler B, Bryan-Kinns N (2013) Designing collaborative musical experiences for broad audiences. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM conference on Creativity & Cognition, C&C ’13. ACM, New York, pp 234–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley M (2013) V&A digital design drop-in events and digital design weekend 2012 visitor profiling report. Internal report, Victoria and Albert Museum, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilda Z (2011) Designing for audience engagement. In: Candy L, Edmonds E (eds) Interacting: art, research and the creative practitioner. Libri Publishing Ltd., Faringdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg J, Giacomi J, Mosher A, Swenton-Wall P (1991) Ethnographic field methods and their relation to design. In: Douglas S, Namioka A (eds) Participatory design: perspectives on systems design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 123–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Brignull H, Rogers Y (2003) Enticing people to interact with large public displays in public spaces. In: Proceedings of the IFIP international conference on human-computer interaction (INTERACT 2003). INTERACT, Zurich, pp 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan-Kinns N (2013) Mutual engagement and collocation with shared representations. Int J Hum Comput Stud 71(1):76–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan-Kinns N (2014) Mutual engagement in digitally mediated public art. In: Candy L, Ferguson S (eds) Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, London, pp 123–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan-Kinns N, Hamilton F (2009) Identifying mutual engagement. Behav Inf Technol 31(2):101–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1975) Beyond boredom and anxiety: experiencing flow in work and play. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1990) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (1996) Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghani J (1995) Flow in human-computer interactions: test of a model. In: Carey J (ed) Human factors in information systems: emerging theoretical bases. Ablex Publishing Corp, Norwood, pp 291–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghani JA, Deshpade SP (1994) Task characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. J Psychol 128(4):381–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath C, vom Lehn D (2008) Configuring ‘interactivity’: enhancing engagement in science centres and museums. Soc Stud Sci 38:63–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heath C, Luff P, vom Lehn D, Hindmarsh J, Cleverly J (2002) Crafting participation: designing ecologies, configuring experience. Vis Commun 1:9–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornecker E, Stifter M (2006) Learning from interactive museum installations about interaction design for public settings. In: Proceedings of the 18th Australia conference on computer- human interaction: design: activities, artefacts and environments, OZCHI ’06, ACM, New York, pp 135–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Ijsselsteijn W, Poels K, de Kort Y (2008) The game experience questionnaire: development of a self-report measure to assess player experiences of digital games. FUGA (the fun of gaming) deliverable d3.3. Tech. rep., TU Eindhoven, Eindhoven

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay WE, Fayard A (1997) HCI, natural science and design: a framework for triangulation across disciplines. In: Proceedings of the 2nd conference on designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, DIS ’97, ACM, New York, pp 223–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Poels K, de Kort Y, Ijsselsteijn W (2008) Game experience questionnaire (English version). Tech. rep., TU Eindhoven, Eindhoven

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly D, Chevalier F, Freeman D (2014) Blending art events and HCI research. In: Candy L, Ferguson S (eds) Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, London, pp 152–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan J, Bryan-Kinns N (2008) Designing for performative tangible interaction. Int J Arts Technol 1(3–4):288–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull D, Connell M (2014) Curating digital public art. In: Candy L, Ferguson S (eds) Interactive experience in the digital age: evaluating new art practice. Springer, London, pp 221–241

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Lehn D, Heath C, Hindmarsh J (2001) Exhibiting interaction: conduct and collaboration in museums and galleries. Symbolic Interact 24:189–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Bengler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bengler, B., Bryan-Kinns, N. (2014). In the Wild: Evaluating Collaborative Interactive Musical Experiences in Public Settings. In: Candy, L., Ferguson, S. (eds) Interactive Experience in the Digital Age. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04510-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04510-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04509-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04510-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics