Abstract
There is mounting evidence that global warming is producing variations in local weather patterns and water supplies, disturbing ecosystems and soil landscapes and impacting economic production and social conditions. Important changes in rainfall patterns, increases in temperatures and more intense and severe climate events have already been observed, with negative impacts for people’s livelihoods. The multiple impacts of climate change could be a considerable source of risk, affecting patterns of development and local livelihoods, but they could also provide new opportunities (i.e., expansion of cultivated areas). In this perspective, climate change has been defined as a “wicked” problem for which there is no easy solutions and no simple approaches. It requires not only a multiplicity of perspectives to understand the phenomenon in all its complexity but also an increasing proximity between university researchers, policy-makers, industry, and citizen sector organizations to manage the risks and opportunities. A significant challenge, nevertheless, has been the limited integration between researchers and those government agencies that play a central role in the everyday management of development and natural resources. There are significant institutional and cultural barriers between researchers and policy-makers that hinder the transformation of scientific knowledge into plans and actions able to strengthen adaptive capacity. The chapter discusses climate governance and the science/practice interface in terms of the process of climate knowledge mobilization. Based on the dissemination experience of two multi-disciplinary policy-oriented projects, the presentation applies the lessons learned and compares these lessons to a variety of insights found in the related literature.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Batie S (2008) Wicked problems and applied economics. Am J Agric Econ 90(5):1176–1191
Brenner RM (2011) Knowledge to practice in the vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience literature: a propositional inventory. In: Kasperson R, Berberian M (eds) Integrating science and policy. Vulnerability and resiliency in global environmental change. Earthscan, London
Brown SR (2006) Q methodology and naturalistic subjectivity. In: Midgley B, Morris E (eds) Modern perspectives on J.R. Kantor and Interbehaviorism. Context Press, Reno, pp 251–268
Brown V, Harris J, Russell J (2010) Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary action. Earthscan, London
Cardoen F (2009) Knowledge to policy. Making the most of development research, IDRC/Sage, Ottawa
Cash DW, Clar WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jager J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Nat Acad Sci 100(14):8086–8091
Choi BCK, Pang T, Lin V, Puska P, Sherman G, Goddard M, Ackland MJ, Sainsbury P, Stachenko S, Morrison H, Clottey C (2005) Can scientists and policy-makers work together. J Epidemiol Commun Health 59(8):632–637
Court J, Young J (2003) Bridging research and policy: insights from 50 case studies. ODI working paper #213, ODI, London. Available at www.odi.org.uk/publications/219-bridging-research-policy-insights-50-case-studies
Dilling L, Lemos MC (2011) Creating usable science: opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Glob Environ Change 21:680–689
Field CB, Mortsch LD, Brklacich M, Forbes DL, Kovacs P, Patz JA, Running SW, Scott MJ (2007) North America. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25(7):739–755
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. SAGE, London
Hajer MA, Wagenaar H (eds) (2003) Deliberative policy analysis—understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Hegger DLT, Dieperink C (2012) Patterns in joint knowledge production projects for regional climate change adaptation—lessons for project and program design. Presented at the Lund earth systems governance conference, Lund, Sweden, April 2012
Hegger D, Lamers M, Van Zeijl-Rozema A, Dieperink C (2012) Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action. Environ Sci Policy 18:52–65
Higgins PAT, Chan KMA, Porder S (2006) Bridge over a philosophical divide. Evid Policy 2(2):249–255
Hoppe R (1999) Policy analysis, science and politics: from “speaking truth to power” to “making sense together”. Sci Pub Policy 26(3):201–210
Ingram J, Stone J, Confalonieri U, Garvin T, Jutro P, Klink C, Lucjman B, Noellemeyer E, Toledo P (2007) Delivering global environmental change science to the policy process. In: Tiessen H, Brklacich M, Breulmann G, Menezes R (eds) Communicating global change science to society. An assessment and case studies. Editorial Island Press, Washington
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability technical summary. A report of working Group II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Jasanoff S (2005) Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Jones N, Jones H, Walsh C (2008) Political science? Strengthening science-policy dialogue in developing countries. Working paper 294, ODI (Overseas Development Institute, London
Kasperson R (2011a) Characterizing the science/practice gap. In: Kasperson R, Berberian M (eds) Integrating science and policy. Vulnerability and resiliency in global environmental change. Earthscan, London
Kasperson R (2011b) Directions for closing the scientific/practice gap. In: Kasperson R, Berberian M (eds) Integrating science and policy. Vulnerability and resiliency in global environmental change. Earthscan, London
Liberatore A, Funtowicz S (2003) “Democratising” expertise, “expertising” democracy: what does this mean, and why bother? Sci Pub Policy 30(3):146–150
Loorbach D (2007) Governance for sustainability. Sustain: Sci Pract Policy 3(2):1–4. Published online 11 Dec 2007 Available at http://www.bing.com/archives/vol3iss2/editorial.loorbach.html
Magrin G, Gay García C, Cruz Choque D, Giménez JC, Moreno AR, Nagy GJ, Nobre C, Villamizar A (2007) Latin America. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working Group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 581–615
Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2001) Rethinking science: knowledge in an age of uncertainty. Polity, Cambridge
Regeer BJ, Hoes AC, van Amstel-van Saane M, Caron-Flinterman FF, Bunders JF (2009) Six guiding principles for evaluating mode-2 strategies for sustainable development. Am J Eval 30:515–537. http://aje.sagepub.com/content/30/4/515
Rotmans J, Kemp R, Van Asselt M (2001) More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight 3(1):15–31
Sarewitz D (2011) Does climate change knowledge really matter? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 2(4):475–481
Von Storch H (2009) Climate research and policy advice: scientific and cultural constructions of knowledge. Environ Sci Policy 12:741–747
Voß JP, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (eds) (2006) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Weingart P (1999) Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics. Sci Pub Policy 26(3):151–161
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Diaz, H., Hurlbert, M. (2014). Making Science Count: Climate Change and the Science/Practice Interface. In: Leal Filho, W., Alves, F., Caeiro, S., Azeiteiro, U. (eds) International Perspectives on Climate Change. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04489-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04489-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04488-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04489-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)