Skip to main content

Risk Management and Business Ethics: Integrating the Human Factor

  • Chapter

Abstract

Risk is defined differently in different disciplines, its meaning sharing the uncertainty that is its essence. This chapter explores “risk” as an active verb, that is, what it means to take risk or to risk, and what it means to manage the risk taking of individuals within the modern corporation. Rather than the usual focus on the well-worn material of the processes and uses of risk measurement and assessment, we explore its ethical aspects, specifically, the conscious decision to take on risk, and its management through incentives that shape organizations’ and individuals’ focus on risk.

There are ethical issues in risky business activities and risky aspects of business ethics. As business ethics is also a dimension of theories of leadership and human resources management, this article focuses on the ethical aspects of risk management, as outlined by business ethics. After a short introduction, there is a general overview of the different ethically relevant dimensions of risk in business (Sect. 2). Section 3 focuses specifically on management risks and risk assessment. Section 4 outlines the role of normative loopholes in risk management to frame our ethical perspective: order ethics. In Sect. 5 we discuss its relation to risk, specifically the way it deals with the human factor in organizations. Section 6 concludes by sketching a theoretical framework for what corporations can do to effectively manage ethical risks and fulfill their social responsibilities at the same time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Kant 1784.

  2. 2.

    Luhmann [23].

  3. 3.

    Bonabeau [5].

  4. 4.

    A very detailed study on this issue and on intrinsic social and organizational problems is introduced by Weick [39] with “The Mann Gulch Disaster”.

  5. 5.

    Knight [17].

  6. 6.

    Knight [17].

  7. 7.

    Hubbard [13].

  8. 8.

    Hanley and Hiromitsu [11].

  9. 9.

    Stigler [36]: 131.

  10. 10.

    Jaynes [15].

  11. 11.

    Stigler [36].

  12. 12.

    E.g. “Risk is the unwanted subset of a set of uncertain outcomes” (Cornelius Keating, acr.).

  13. 13.

    This definition was accepted by The Open Group, see: The Open Group [26].

  14. 14.

    “Risk is a combination of the likelihood of an occurrence of a hazardous event or exposure(s) and the severity of injury or ill health that can be caused by the event or exposure(s)” (Occupational Health & Safety Advisory Service [25]).

  15. 15.

    Wolman [40].

  16. 16.

    Cf. the other articles in this volume.

  17. 17.

    Tversky and Kahneman [37].

  18. 18.

    Rucellai [32] (written about 1450).

  19. 19.

    Cf. Homann et al. [12], Luetge [19, 20].

  20. 20.

    Eucken [7].

  21. 21.

    Cf. Smith [35].

  22. 22.

    This model of action refers to Baier [1, 2], Hume [14] and Luhmann [22].

  23. 23.

    About the function of normative values in decisions see Schnebel [33].

  24. 24.

    Cf. Picot et al. [27].

  25. 25.

    Cf. the Institute of Risk Management, Risk Appetite and Tolerance, Crowe Horwath.

  26. 26.

    Many of the most challenging problems in modern societies, from interpersonal to intergroup issues, are at their core social dilemmas (cf. Liebrand et al. [18] and Beckenkamp [4]).

  27. 27.

    Cf. Westphal [38].

  28. 28.

    Power [29].

  29. 29.

    Cf. Power [29, 30].

  30. 30.

    Cf. Rücker [34].

  31. 31.

    Cf. Matthes [24], 56.

  32. 32.

    www.bis.org, publications and papers.

  33. 33.

    Beyond this categorization is a huge number of different other categorizations offered, e.g., for project management, IT, running nuclear power plants, health and cancer.

  34. 34.

    Friedman [9].

  35. 35.

    Popper famously wrote that the main advantage of democracy is to be able to get rid of its governments “without bloodshed—for example, by way of general elections” (Popper [28], vol. 1, 124, our italics). Note the wording “for example”.

References

Selected Bibliography

  1. E. Bonabeau, Understanding and Managing Complexity Risk. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 48(4), 62–68 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Crane, D. Matten, Business Ethics. Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Luetge, Economic Ethics, in Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. 4 Vols (Elsevier, Oxford, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Luetge (ed.), Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics (Springer, Heidelberg, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Power, Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

Additional Literature

  1. K. Arrow, Social Choice and Individual Values (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1951)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Baier, Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96, 231–260 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Baier, Moralism and cruelty: reflections on Hume and Kant. Ethics 103, 436–457 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Beckenkamp, Sanktionen im Gemeingutdilemma: eine spieltheoretische und psychologische Analyse (Beltz, Weinheim, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Crane, D. Matten, Business Ethics. Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Eucken, Ordnungspolitik. Hrsg. Walter Oswald (LIT, Münster, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Friedman, The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Mag. 32, 122–126 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Green, L. Shapiro, Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. A Critique of Applications in Political Science (Yale University Press, New York, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Hanley, K. Hiromitsu, Reliability Engineering and Risk Assessment (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Homann, P. Koslowski, C. Luetge (eds.), Globalisation and Business Ethics (Ashgate, Aldershot, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Hubbard, The Failure of Risk Management: Why It’s Broken and How to Fix It (Wiley, Hoboken, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. D. Hume, An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998). Originally published in 1751

    Google Scholar 

  14. E.T. Jaynes, Bayesian methods: general background, in Maximum-Entropy and Bayesian Methods in Applied Statistics, ed. by J.H. Justice (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Kant, An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment? (1784). Originally published

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Knight, Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit (Houghton Mifflin, Chicago, 1921)

    Google Scholar 

  17. W. Liebrand, P. van Lange, D. Messick, Social dilemmas, in The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Psychology, ed. by A.S.R. Manstead, M. Hewstone (Blackwell, Oxford, 1996), pp. 546–551

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Luetge, Economic ethics, business ethics, and the idea of mutual advantages. Bus. Ethics, Eur. Rev. 14, 108–118 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Luetge, An economic rationale for a work and savings ethic? J. Buchanan’s late works and business ethics. J. Bus. Ethics 66, 43–51 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. N. Luhmann, Die Programmierung von Entscheidung und das Problem der Flexibilität, in Bürokratische Organisation, ed. by R. Mayntz (Kiepenheuer & Witsch, Köln, 1968), pp. 324–339

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. Luhmann, Familiarity, confidence, trust: problems and alternatives, in Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, ed. by D. Gambetta (Blackwell, Oxford, 1988), pp. 94–107

    Google Scholar 

  22. N. Luhmann, Modern society shocked by its risks. University of Hong Kong, Department of Sociology Occasional Papers 17, Hong Kong (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Matthes, Die Wirkung von Vertrauen auf die Ex-Post-Transaktionskosten in Kooperation und Hierarchie (Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Occupational Health & Safety Advisory Services. Document 18001, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  25. The Open Group, Technical standard risk taxonomy: document number: C081. The Open Group, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Picot, R. Reichwald, R. Wigand, Information, Organization and Management (Springer, Berlin, 2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. K. Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies, 2 Vols., 5th edn. (Routledge/Kegan Paul, London, 1966). Originally published in 1945

    Google Scholar 

  28. M. Power, The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Power, Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. Rorty, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  31. G. Rucellai, Ricordanze. Padua, 1772

    Google Scholar 

  32. S. Rücker, Le risque moral par rapport aux fusions & acquisitions. Schriftenreihe des ESB Research Institute, vol. 45 (Ibidem Verlag, Stuttgart, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. Schnebel, Values in decision-making processes: systematic structures of J. Habermas and N. Luhmann for the appreciation of responsibility in leadership. J. Bus. Ethics 27, 79–88 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. A. Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1982). Originally published in 1776

    Google Scholar 

  35. S. Stigler, The History of Statistics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1986), p. 131

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. A. Tversky, D. Kahneman, Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business 59, S251–S278 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. K. Weick, The collapse of sensemaking in organisations: the Mann gulch disaster. Adm. Sci. Q. 38, 628–652 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. N. Westphal, Ethik als Wettbewerbsfaktor. Wirtschaftsethische Potenziale im Unternehmen (Lit, Münster, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  39. D. Wolman, Before the levees break: a plan to save the Netherlands. Wired Mag. 17.01. 22.12.2008

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Luetge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Luetge, C., Schnebel, E., Westphal, N. (2014). Risk Management and Business Ethics: Integrating the Human Factor. In: Klüppelberg, C., Straub, D., Welpe, I. (eds) Risk - A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04486-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics