Skip to main content

Risk in Historical Perspective: Concepts, Contexts, and Conjunctions

  • Chapter

Abstract

Although the etymological roots of the term risk can be traced back as far as the late Middle Ages, the modern concept of risk appeared only gradually, with the transition from traditional to modern society. The modern understanding of risk presupposes subjects or institutions, accountable for their actions, that make decisions under conditions of apparent uncertainty. Some apparent uncertainties, however, can be measured or quantified probabilistically and are, therefore, more precisely called “risks”. Situations of “risk” in human society can thus be “managed”. Relying on probability calculation, which emerged during the 17th and the 18th centuries but became truly prevalent only in the 20th century, risk became a theoretical focus designed to bolster a scientific, mathematically-based approach toward uncertainty. Insurance companies led in demanding and developing a concretely applicable concept of risk, since calculating the probability of premature death or material hazards related to either humans or material things, such as ships, buildings, and their contents, was essential for their core business and success. However, by the middle of the 20th century—an Age of Extremes, as it has been aptly characterized—nuclear weapons and their use in Japan and subsequent further development early in the Cold War dramatically increased awareness of potential hazards derived from these and other achievements in science, engineering and warfare. Therefore, the Age of Extremes stimulated more and new research on risk. With new tools, such as operations research, digital computers, systems analysis, and systems management, all of which had been introduced in the military and aerospace sectors in the course of World War II, the intellectual resources necessary to estimate the extent and the probability of failures and accidents in nuclear warfare and beyond increased dramatically. Out of the Cold War effort to create the “Peaceful Atom”, nuclear-power reactor safety studies became landmarks in risk analysis, and this type of study later achieved relevance in many more areas. This chapter seeks to explore the evolution of risk research and risk management in its social and political contexts in order to understand the underlying concepts of risk and safety as social constructs. The historical survey focuses mainly on the last two centuries. It starts with the advent of the modern era when with spreading bourgeois virtues it became common to plan for the future but not to bet on it. This involved an increasing need to calculate future uncertainties in order to manage them as risks. The study stops at the end of the Cold War, when the collapse of the socialist bloc settled the risky confrontation between the two opposing societal camps. By no means did the termination of the Cold War end the story about risk. On the contrary, as late modern societies accumulate more and more knowledge they simultaneously increase the amount of ignorance that is the cause of newly emerging risk. How these risks are tackled is the topic of the other chapters in this book. This historical survey does not aim at completeness but rather at understanding the major transformations in the evolution of risk. Thus, not all areas in the history of risk are covered here; for instance, the important field of financial risk is treated by other Chap. 4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On the classical differentiation between uncertainty and risk see Knight [22]. As a well informed and yet popular story of risk see Bernstein [43].

  2. 2.

    During the 19th century the term risk remained confined to the economic sphere and was used with the meaning of venture or hazard of loss (cf. Schulz and Basler, 452 [88]).

  3. 3.

    Even a short history of game theory is beyond the scope of this chapter, but the interested reader should consult the following work: Poundstone [79]. On game theory in the Cold War think tank RAND see Hounshell, 253–255 [66].

  4. 4.

    On programs to put the peaceful atom in service of food and agriculture see e.g. Zachmann [101].

  5. 5.

    See the paragraph on SQC above.

  6. 6.

    On FMEA and FTA as methods to increase dependability in engineering systems today see Vogel-Heuser and Straub in this book.

  7. 7.

    For an excellent historical interpretation of Monte Carlo simulations (see Galison, 689–780 [17]).

  8. 8.

    According to Radkau, the first German research program on reactor safety was instituted by the Minister of Research and Technology only in 1971. It was triggered by the project of BASF to establish a nuclear power plant in Ludwigshafen and thus near big cities. This project was abandoned in 1972 (Radkau, 381–382 [32]).

  9. 9.

    The article was published in Science 165, 1232–1238. Thompson, Deisler, and Schwing, 1334 [32] praised it as providing “the basis for approaching risk issues systematically and quantitatively and (introducing) the concept of tradeoffs between risks and benefits for a wide range of risks”.

  10. 10.

    For an extensive and knowledge-able overview on the disciplinary perspectives on risk see Althaus, 567–588 [1].

References

Selected Bibliography

  1. C. Althaus, A disciplinary perspective on the epistemological status of risk. Risk Anal. 25, 567–588 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. U. Beck, Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  3. U. Beck, Weltrisikogesellschaft. Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. Bonß, Vom Risiko. Unsicherheit und Ungewissheit in der Moderne (Hamburger Edition, Hamburg, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.G. Burke, Bursting boilers and the federal power. Technol. Cult. 7, 1–23 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Carlisle, Probabilistic risk assessment in nuclear reactors: engineering success, public relations failure. Technol. Cult. 38, 920–941 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R.B. Cumming, Is risk assessment a science? Risk Anal. 1, 1–3 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Daeves, Großzahlforschung. Grundlagen und Anwendungen eines neuen Arbeitsverfahrens für die Industrieforschung mit zahlreichen praktischen Beispielen (Stahleisen m.b.H., Düsseldorf, 1924)

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Daeves, A. Beckel, Großzahl-Forschung und Häufigkeits-Analyse. Ein Leitfaden (Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1948)

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Daston, The domestication of risk: mathematical probability and insurance 1650–1830, in The Probabilistic Revolution, ed. by L. Krüger, L.J. Daston, M. Heidelberger. Ideas in History, vol. 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1987), pp. 237–260

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Daston, Classical Probability in the Enlightenment (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Douglas, A. Wildavsky, Risk and Culture. An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Ewald, Der Vorsorgestaat (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Ford, A History of Federal Nuclear Safety Assessments: From WASH-740 Through the Reactor Safety Study (Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  15. J.-B. Fressoz, Beck back in the 19th century: towards a genealogy of risk society. Hist. Technol. 23, 333–350 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. T.C. Fry, Probability and Its Engineering Uses (Van Nostrand, New York, 1928)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. P. Galison, Image and Logic (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Garrick, The approach to risk analysis in three industries: nuclear power, space systems, and chemical process. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 23, 195–205 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Gigerenzer et al., The Empire of Chance. How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. E. Hobsbawm, Das Zeitalter der Extreme. Weltgeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts (Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, München, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Jasanoff, The Fifth Branch. Science Advisers as Policymakers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  22. F. Knight, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, 1st edn. (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1921)

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Lengwiler, Risikopolitik im Sozialstaat. Die schweizerische Unfallversicherung (Böhlau, Köln, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. N. Luhmann, Soziologie des Risikos (de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Lukes, 150 Jahre Recht der technischen Sicherheit in Deutschland—Geschichtliche Entwicklung und Durchsetzungsmöglichkeiten, in Risiko—Schnittstelle zwischen Recht und Technik, ed. by VDE (VDE-Verlag, Berlin, 1982), pp. 11–43

    Google Scholar 

  26. O. Morgenstern, Spieltheorie und Wirtschaftswissenschaft (Oldenburg, Wien, 1963)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. J.v. Neumann, O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1944)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Öko-Institut Freiburg (ed.), Die Risiken der Atomkraftwerke. Der Anti-Rasmussen-Report der Union of Concerned Scientists (Adolf Bonz, Fellbach, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. Pabst, Theorie und Methodenentwicklung bei der Versicherung technischer Risiken am Beispiel der Maschinenversicherung in Deutschland (Diss., Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaft, TU München, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  30. C. Perrow, Normale Katastrophen. Die unvermeidbaren Risiken der Großtechnik (Campus, Frankfurt, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  31. I. Pfeffer, Insurance and Economic Theory (Richard D. Irwin, Boston, 1956)

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Radkau, Aufstieg und Krise der deutschen Atomwirtschaft 1945–1975. Verdrängte Alternativen in der Kerntechnik und der Ursprung der nuklearen Kontroverse (Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  33. N.C. Rasmussen, Reactor safety study. An assessment of accident risk in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants (WASH-1400, NUREG 75/014). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  34. O. Renn, Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges. J. Risk Res. 1, 49–71 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. O. Renn, Risk Governance. Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World (Earthscan, London, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. W.A. Shewhart, Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product, 1st edn. (Van Nostrand, New York, 1931)

    Google Scholar 

  37. J.V. Simson, Kanalisation und Stadthygiene im 19. Jahrhundert (VDI, Düsseldorf, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  38. K.M. Thompson, P.F. Deisler Jr., R.C. Schwing, Interdisciplinary vision: the first 25 years of the society for risk analysis (SRA), 1980–2005. Risk Anal. 25, 1333–1386 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. R. Tobies, Morgen möchte ich wieder 100 herrliche Sachen ausrechnen. Iris Runge bei Osram und Telefunken (Franz Steiner, Stuttgart, 2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. G. Wiesenack, Wesen und Geschichte der Technischen Überwachungsvereine (Carl Heymanns, Köln, 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  41. K. Zachmann, P. Østby, Food, technology, and trust: an introduction. Hist. Technol. 27, 1–10 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Additional Literature and Sources

  1. B. Bächi, Zur Krise der westdeutschen Grenzwertpolitik in den 1970er Jahren: Die Verwandlung des Berufskrebses von einem toxikologischen in ein sozioökonomisches Problem. Ber. Wiss.gesch. 33, 419–435 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Bernstein, Against the Gods. The Remarkable Story of Risk (Wiley, New York, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Bonß, (Un-)Sicherheit als Problem der Moderne, in Handeln unter Risiko. Gestaltungsansätze zwischen Wagnis und Vorsorge, ed. by H. Münkler, M. Bohlender, S. Meurer (transcript, Bielefeld, 2010), pp. 33–53

    Google Scholar 

  4. Der Bundesminister für Forschung und Technologie (ed.), Deutsche Risikostudie Kernkraftwerke. Eine Studie zu dem durch Störfälle in Kernkraftwerken verursachten Risiko (TÜV Rheinland, Bonn, 1980). Hauptband

    Google Scholar 

  5. Der Bundesminister für Forschung und Technologie (ed.), Deutsche Risikostudie Kernkraftwerke Phase B (TÜV Rheinland, Bonn, 1989). Available at http://www.grs.de/sites/default/files/pdf/Dt._Risikostudie_Kernkraftwerke_Phase_B.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.A. Campbell, Mathematics in industrial research: ‘selling’ mathematics to the industries. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 3, 550–557 (1925)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Carson, Silent Spring (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Clow, N.L. Clow, The Chemical Revolution: A Contribution to Social Technology (Batchworth Press, London, 1952)

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. Covello, J. Mumpower, Risk analysis and risk management: an historical perspective. Risk Anal. 5, 103–120 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P.-A. Dessaux, Chemical expertise and food market regulation in Belle-Epoque France. Hist. Technol. 23, 351–368 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. B.S. Dhillon, Systems safety: a survey. Microelectron. Reliab. 22, 265–275 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Doering-Manteuffel, L. Raphael, Nach dem Boom. Perspektiven auf die Zeitgeschichte seit 1970 (Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Doorn, S.O. Hansson, Should probabilistic design replace safety factors? Philos. Technol. 24, 151–168 (2011). Available at http://www.springerlink.com/content/818781xk76376m40/fulltext.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Ericson, Fault tree analysis—a history, in Proceedings of the 17th International System Safety Conference (1999). Available at http://www.fault-tree.net/papers/ericson-fta-history.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Ericson, A short history of system safety. J. Syst. Saf. 42, 3 (2006). Available at http://www.system-safety.org/ejss/past/novdec2006ejss/clifs.php

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Evans, Tod in Hamburg. Stadt, Gesellschaft und Politik in den Cholera-Jahren 1830–1910 (Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.B. Fogel, The Escape from Hunger and Premature Death, 1700–2100: Europe, America, and the Third World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. T.C. Fry, Industrial mathematics, in Research—A National Ressource—II, Section VI, Part 4, Washington, D.C. (1940), pp. 268–288

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Garrick, Risk assessment practices in the space industry: the move toward quantification. Risk Anal. 9, 1–7 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS), (ed.), 30 Jahre Forschungs- und Sachverständigentätigkeit (GRS, Köln, 2007). Available at http://www.grs.de/sites/default/files/kum/festschrift_30_jahre.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Gieryn, Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48, 781–795 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D. Haasl, Advanced concepts in fault tree analysis. Presented at system safety symposium sponsored by University of Washington and the Boeing Company, June 8–9, 1965, 1. Available at http://www.fault-tree.net/papers/haasl-advanced-concepts-in-fta.pdf

  23. A.I. Hardy, Der Arzt, die Ingenieure und die Städteassanierung. Georg Varrentrapps Visionen zur Kanalisation, Trinkwasserversorgung und Bauhygiene in deutschen Städten (1860–1880). Technikgeschichte 72, 91–126 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. Hierholzer, Nahrung nach Norm. Regulierung von Nahrungsmittelqualität in der Industrialisierung 1871–1914 (Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Hounshell, The cold war, RAND, and the generation of knowledge, 1946–1962. Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 27, 237–267 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D.A. Hounshell, J.K. Smith, Science and Corporate Strategy. Du Pont R&D, 1902–1980 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988), pp. 555–572

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Jasanoff, Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis. Risk Anal. 13, 123–129 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. Jasanoff, Designs of Nature. Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. J.M. Juran, Early SQC: a historical supplement. Qual. Prog. 30, 73–81 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  30. P. Koch, Versicherungsgeschichte in Stichworten. Schriftenreihe des Vereins zur Förderung der Versicherungswissenschaft in München e.V., vol. 32 (1988), pp. 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Labisch, J. Vögele, Stadt und Gesundheit. Anmerkungen zur neueren sozial- und medizinhistorischen Diskussion in Deutschland. Arch. Soz.gesch. 37, 396–424 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  32. W.S. Lee, D.L. Grosh, F.A. Tillman, C.H. Lie, Fault tree analysis, methods, and applications—a review. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 34, 198 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  33. W. Masing, Von TESTA zur Protagonistin der Business Excellence—Geschichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Qualität e.V, in Qualitätsmanagement—Tradition und Zukunft. Festschrift zum 50-jährigen Bestehen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Qualität e.V., ed. by W. Masing et al. (Hanser, München, 2003), pp. 389–418

    Google Scholar 

  34. D.H. Meadows, J. Randers, D.L. Meadows, The Limits to Growth (Universe Books, New York, 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  35. L. Merz, Philosophie des Reaktorschutzes. atw, 118–126 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  36. L. Merz, Restrisiko. Das Doppelgesicht der Reaktorsicherheit. atw, 294–298 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  37. P. Miranti, Corporate learning and quality control at the bell system, 1877–1929. Bus. Hist. Rev. 79, 39–72 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. W. Poundstone, Prisoner’s Dilemma (Anchor Book/Doubleday, New York, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  39. President Eisenhower’s, “Atoms for Peace” Speech, 1953. Available at http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/Deterrence/Atomsforpeace.shtml

  40. Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 2005. Available at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s109-865

  41. Profile—John Garrick: nuclear risk assessment pioneer. Risk Anal. 29, 935–939 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  42. A. Rip, The mutual dependence of risk research and political context. Sci. Technol. Stud. 4, 3–15 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  43. G.A. Ritter, Der Sozialstaat: Entstehung und Entwicklung im internationalen Vergleich (Oldenbourg, München, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  44. C.A. Rosenberg, The Cholera Years: The United States in 1832, 1849, and 1866 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  45. N. Rosenberg, The direction of technological change: inducement. Mechanisms and focusing devices. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 18, 1–24 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. T. Schlich, Einführung. Die Kontrolle notwendiger Krankheitsursachen als Strategie der Krankheitsbeherrschung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, in Strategien der Kausalität: Konzepte der Krankheitsverursachung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, ed. by C. Gradmann, T. Schlich (Centaurus, Pfaffenweiler, 1999), pp. 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  47. H. Schulz, O. Basler (eds.), Deutsches Fremdwörterbuch (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1977), p. 452

    Google Scholar 

  48. B. Sinclair, Philadelphia’s Philosopher Mechanics: A History of the Franklin Institute, 1824–1865 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  49. B. Sinclair, A Centennial History of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  50. D.F. Smith, J. Phillips (eds.), Food, Science, Policy and Regulation in the Twentieth Century: International and Comparative Perspectives (Routledge, New York, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  51. W.H. Sperber, R.F. Stier, Happy 50th birthday to HACCP: retrospective and prospective. Food Saf. Mag. (December 2009/January 2010). Available at http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/article.asp?id=3481

  52. U. Spiekermann, Redefining food: the standardization of products and the production in Europe and the United States, 1880–1914. Hist. Technol. 27, 11–36 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. J.E. Stott, P.T. Britton, R.W. Ring, F. Hark, G.S. Hatfield, Common cause failure modeling: aerospace vs nuclear (2010). Available at http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20100025991_2010028311.pdf

  54. T. Tietjen, D.H. Müller, FMEA Praxis. Das Komplettpaket für Training und Anwendung (Hanser, München, 2003), pp. 4–5

    Google Scholar 

  55. S. Walker, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, A Short History of Nuclear Regulation, 1946–1999 (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, 2000), pp. 41–42

    Google Scholar 

  56. A.M. Weinberg, Science and trans-science. Minerva 10, 209–222 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. A.M. Weinberg, Reflections on risk assessment. Risk Anal. 1, 5–7 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. R. Williams, Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (Oxford University Press, New York, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  59. A.S. Wohl, Endangered Lives: Public Health in Victorian Britain (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  60. K. Zachmann, Grenzenlose Machbarkeit und unbegrenzte Haltbarkeit? Das „friedliche Atom“ im Dienst der Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft. Technikgeschichte 78, 231–253 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karin Zachmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zachmann, K. (2014). Risk in Historical Perspective: Concepts, Contexts, and Conjunctions. In: Klüppelberg, C., Straub, D., Welpe, I. (eds) Risk - A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04486-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics