Abstract
Although the etymological roots of the term risk can be traced back as far as the late Middle Ages, the modern concept of risk appeared only gradually, with the transition from traditional to modern society. The modern understanding of risk presupposes subjects or institutions, accountable for their actions, that make decisions under conditions of apparent uncertainty. Some apparent uncertainties, however, can be measured or quantified probabilistically and are, therefore, more precisely called “risks”. Situations of “risk” in human society can thus be “managed”. Relying on probability calculation, which emerged during the 17th and the 18th centuries but became truly prevalent only in the 20th century, risk became a theoretical focus designed to bolster a scientific, mathematically-based approach toward uncertainty. Insurance companies led in demanding and developing a concretely applicable concept of risk, since calculating the probability of premature death or material hazards related to either humans or material things, such as ships, buildings, and their contents, was essential for their core business and success. However, by the middle of the 20th century—an Age of Extremes, as it has been aptly characterized—nuclear weapons and their use in Japan and subsequent further development early in the Cold War dramatically increased awareness of potential hazards derived from these and other achievements in science, engineering and warfare. Therefore, the Age of Extremes stimulated more and new research on risk. With new tools, such as operations research, digital computers, systems analysis, and systems management, all of which had been introduced in the military and aerospace sectors in the course of World War II, the intellectual resources necessary to estimate the extent and the probability of failures and accidents in nuclear warfare and beyond increased dramatically. Out of the Cold War effort to create the “Peaceful Atom”, nuclear-power reactor safety studies became landmarks in risk analysis, and this type of study later achieved relevance in many more areas. This chapter seeks to explore the evolution of risk research and risk management in its social and political contexts in order to understand the underlying concepts of risk and safety as social constructs. The historical survey focuses mainly on the last two centuries. It starts with the advent of the modern era when with spreading bourgeois virtues it became common to plan for the future but not to bet on it. This involved an increasing need to calculate future uncertainties in order to manage them as risks. The study stops at the end of the Cold War, when the collapse of the socialist bloc settled the risky confrontation between the two opposing societal camps. By no means did the termination of the Cold War end the story about risk. On the contrary, as late modern societies accumulate more and more knowledge they simultaneously increase the amount of ignorance that is the cause of newly emerging risk. How these risks are tackled is the topic of the other chapters in this book. This historical survey does not aim at completeness but rather at understanding the major transformations in the evolution of risk. Thus, not all areas in the history of risk are covered here; for instance, the important field of financial risk is treated by other Chap. 4.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
During the 19th century the term risk remained confined to the economic sphere and was used with the meaning of venture or hazard of loss (cf. Schulz and Basler, 452 [88]).
- 3.
- 4.
On programs to put the peaceful atom in service of food and agriculture see e.g. Zachmann [101].
- 5.
See the paragraph on SQC above.
- 6.
On FMEA and FTA as methods to increase dependability in engineering systems today see Vogel-Heuser and Straub in this book.
- 7.
For an excellent historical interpretation of Monte Carlo simulations (see Galison, 689–780 [17]).
- 8.
According to Radkau, the first German research program on reactor safety was instituted by the Minister of Research and Technology only in 1971. It was triggered by the project of BASF to establish a nuclear power plant in Ludwigshafen and thus near big cities. This project was abandoned in 1972 (Radkau, 381–382 [32]).
- 9.
The article was published in Science 165, 1232–1238. Thompson, Deisler, and Schwing, 1334 [32] praised it as providing “the basis for approaching risk issues systematically and quantitatively and (introducing) the concept of tradeoffs between risks and benefits for a wide range of risks”.
- 10.
For an extensive and knowledge-able overview on the disciplinary perspectives on risk see Althaus, 567–588 [1].
References
Selected Bibliography
C. Althaus, A disciplinary perspective on the epistemological status of risk. Risk Anal. 25, 567–588 (2005)
U. Beck, Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1986)
U. Beck, Weltrisikogesellschaft. Auf der Suche nach der verlorenen Sicherheit (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 2007)
W. Bonß, Vom Risiko. Unsicherheit und Ungewissheit in der Moderne (Hamburger Edition, Hamburg, 1995)
J.G. Burke, Bursting boilers and the federal power. Technol. Cult. 7, 1–23 (1966)
R. Carlisle, Probabilistic risk assessment in nuclear reactors: engineering success, public relations failure. Technol. Cult. 38, 920–941 (1997)
R.B. Cumming, Is risk assessment a science? Risk Anal. 1, 1–3 (1981)
K. Daeves, Großzahlforschung. Grundlagen und Anwendungen eines neuen Arbeitsverfahrens für die Industrieforschung mit zahlreichen praktischen Beispielen (Stahleisen m.b.H., Düsseldorf, 1924)
K. Daeves, A. Beckel, Großzahl-Forschung und Häufigkeits-Analyse. Ein Leitfaden (Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1948)
L. Daston, The domestication of risk: mathematical probability and insurance 1650–1830, in The Probabilistic Revolution, ed. by L. Krüger, L.J. Daston, M. Heidelberger. Ideas in History, vol. 1 (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1987), pp. 237–260
L. Daston, Classical Probability in the Enlightenment (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1988)
M. Douglas, A. Wildavsky, Risk and Culture. An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1982)
F. Ewald, Der Vorsorgestaat (Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, 1993)
D. Ford, A History of Federal Nuclear Safety Assessments: From WASH-740 Through the Reactor Safety Study (Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, 1977)
J.-B. Fressoz, Beck back in the 19th century: towards a genealogy of risk society. Hist. Technol. 23, 333–350 (2007)
T.C. Fry, Probability and Its Engineering Uses (Van Nostrand, New York, 1928)
P. Galison, Image and Logic (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1997)
J. Garrick, The approach to risk analysis in three industries: nuclear power, space systems, and chemical process. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 23, 195–205 (1988)
G. Gigerenzer et al., The Empire of Chance. How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989)
E. Hobsbawm, Das Zeitalter der Extreme. Weltgeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts (Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag, München, 1999)
S. Jasanoff, The Fifth Branch. Science Advisers as Policymakers (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1990)
F. Knight, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, 1st edn. (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1921)
M. Lengwiler, Risikopolitik im Sozialstaat. Die schweizerische Unfallversicherung (Böhlau, Köln, 2006)
N. Luhmann, Soziologie des Risikos (de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991)
R. Lukes, 150 Jahre Recht der technischen Sicherheit in Deutschland—Geschichtliche Entwicklung und Durchsetzungsmöglichkeiten, in Risiko—Schnittstelle zwischen Recht und Technik, ed. by VDE (VDE-Verlag, Berlin, 1982), pp. 11–43
O. Morgenstern, Spieltheorie und Wirtschaftswissenschaft (Oldenburg, Wien, 1963)
J.v. Neumann, O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1944)
Öko-Institut Freiburg (ed.), Die Risiken der Atomkraftwerke. Der Anti-Rasmussen-Report der Union of Concerned Scientists (Adolf Bonz, Fellbach, 1980)
R. Pabst, Theorie und Methodenentwicklung bei der Versicherung technischer Risiken am Beispiel der Maschinenversicherung in Deutschland (Diss., Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaft, TU München, 2011)
C. Perrow, Normale Katastrophen. Die unvermeidbaren Risiken der Großtechnik (Campus, Frankfurt, 1992)
I. Pfeffer, Insurance and Economic Theory (Richard D. Irwin, Boston, 1956)
J. Radkau, Aufstieg und Krise der deutschen Atomwirtschaft 1945–1975. Verdrängte Alternativen in der Kerntechnik und der Ursprung der nuklearen Kontroverse (Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg, 1983)
N.C. Rasmussen, Reactor safety study. An assessment of accident risk in U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants (WASH-1400, NUREG 75/014). U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, 1975
O. Renn, Three decades of risk research: accomplishments and new challenges. J. Risk Res. 1, 49–71 (1998)
O. Renn, Risk Governance. Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World (Earthscan, London, 2008)
W.A. Shewhart, Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product, 1st edn. (Van Nostrand, New York, 1931)
J.V. Simson, Kanalisation und Stadthygiene im 19. Jahrhundert (VDI, Düsseldorf, 1983)
K.M. Thompson, P.F. Deisler Jr., R.C. Schwing, Interdisciplinary vision: the first 25 years of the society for risk analysis (SRA), 1980–2005. Risk Anal. 25, 1333–1386 (2005)
R. Tobies, Morgen möchte ich wieder 100 herrliche Sachen ausrechnen. Iris Runge bei Osram und Telefunken (Franz Steiner, Stuttgart, 2010)
G. Wiesenack, Wesen und Geschichte der Technischen Überwachungsvereine (Carl Heymanns, Köln, 1971)
K. Zachmann, P. Østby, Food, technology, and trust: an introduction. Hist. Technol. 27, 1–10 (2001)
Additional Literature and Sources
B. Bächi, Zur Krise der westdeutschen Grenzwertpolitik in den 1970er Jahren: Die Verwandlung des Berufskrebses von einem toxikologischen in ein sozioökonomisches Problem. Ber. Wiss.gesch. 33, 419–435 (2010)
P. Bernstein, Against the Gods. The Remarkable Story of Risk (Wiley, New York, 1996)
W. Bonß, (Un-)Sicherheit als Problem der Moderne, in Handeln unter Risiko. Gestaltungsansätze zwischen Wagnis und Vorsorge, ed. by H. Münkler, M. Bohlender, S. Meurer (transcript, Bielefeld, 2010), pp. 33–53
Der Bundesminister für Forschung und Technologie (ed.), Deutsche Risikostudie Kernkraftwerke. Eine Studie zu dem durch Störfälle in Kernkraftwerken verursachten Risiko (TÜV Rheinland, Bonn, 1980). Hauptband
Der Bundesminister für Forschung und Technologie (ed.), Deutsche Risikostudie Kernkraftwerke Phase B (TÜV Rheinland, Bonn, 1989). Available at http://www.grs.de/sites/default/files/pdf/Dt._Risikostudie_Kernkraftwerke_Phase_B.pdf
G.A. Campbell, Mathematics in industrial research: ‘selling’ mathematics to the industries. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 3, 550–557 (1925)
R. Carson, Silent Spring (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 1962)
A. Clow, N.L. Clow, The Chemical Revolution: A Contribution to Social Technology (Batchworth Press, London, 1952)
V. Covello, J. Mumpower, Risk analysis and risk management: an historical perspective. Risk Anal. 5, 103–120 (1986)
P.-A. Dessaux, Chemical expertise and food market regulation in Belle-Epoque France. Hist. Technol. 23, 351–368 (2007)
B.S. Dhillon, Systems safety: a survey. Microelectron. Reliab. 22, 265–275 (1982)
A. Doering-Manteuffel, L. Raphael, Nach dem Boom. Perspektiven auf die Zeitgeschichte seit 1970 (Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, 2008)
N. Doorn, S.O. Hansson, Should probabilistic design replace safety factors? Philos. Technol. 24, 151–168 (2011). Available at http://www.springerlink.com/content/818781xk76376m40/fulltext.pdf
C. Ericson, Fault tree analysis—a history, in Proceedings of the 17th International System Safety Conference (1999). Available at http://www.fault-tree.net/papers/ericson-fta-history.pdf
C. Ericson, A short history of system safety. J. Syst. Saf. 42, 3 (2006). Available at http://www.system-safety.org/ejss/past/novdec2006ejss/clifs.php
R. Evans, Tod in Hamburg. Stadt, Gesellschaft und Politik in den Cholera-Jahren 1830–1910 (Rowohlt, Reinbek bei Hamburg, 1990)
R.B. Fogel, The Escape from Hunger and Premature Death, 1700–2100: Europe, America, and the Third World (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)
T.C. Fry, Industrial mathematics, in Research—A National Ressource—II, Section VI, Part 4, Washington, D.C. (1940), pp. 268–288
J. Garrick, Risk assessment practices in the space industry: the move toward quantification. Risk Anal. 9, 1–7 (1989)
Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS), (ed.), 30 Jahre Forschungs- und Sachverständigentätigkeit (GRS, Köln, 2007). Available at http://www.grs.de/sites/default/files/kum/festschrift_30_jahre.pdf
T. Gieryn, Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48, 781–795 (1983)
D. Haasl, Advanced concepts in fault tree analysis. Presented at system safety symposium sponsored by University of Washington and the Boeing Company, June 8–9, 1965, 1. Available at http://www.fault-tree.net/papers/haasl-advanced-concepts-in-fta.pdf
A.I. Hardy, Der Arzt, die Ingenieure und die Städteassanierung. Georg Varrentrapps Visionen zur Kanalisation, Trinkwasserversorgung und Bauhygiene in deutschen Städten (1860–1880). Technikgeschichte 72, 91–126 (2005)
V. Hierholzer, Nahrung nach Norm. Regulierung von Nahrungsmittelqualität in der Industrialisierung 1871–1914 (Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen, 2010)
D. Hounshell, The cold war, RAND, and the generation of knowledge, 1946–1962. Hist. Stud. Phys. Sci. 27, 237–267 (1997)
D.A. Hounshell, J.K. Smith, Science and Corporate Strategy. Du Pont R&D, 1902–1980 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988), pp. 555–572
S. Jasanoff, Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis. Risk Anal. 13, 123–129 (1993)
S. Jasanoff, Designs of Nature. Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2005)
J.M. Juran, Early SQC: a historical supplement. Qual. Prog. 30, 73–81 (1997)
P. Koch, Versicherungsgeschichte in Stichworten. Schriftenreihe des Vereins zur Förderung der Versicherungswissenschaft in München e.V., vol. 32 (1988), pp. 1–16
A. Labisch, J. Vögele, Stadt und Gesundheit. Anmerkungen zur neueren sozial- und medizinhistorischen Diskussion in Deutschland. Arch. Soz.gesch. 37, 396–424 (1997)
W.S. Lee, D.L. Grosh, F.A. Tillman, C.H. Lie, Fault tree analysis, methods, and applications—a review. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 34, 198 (1985)
W. Masing, Von TESTA zur Protagonistin der Business Excellence—Geschichte der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Qualität e.V, in Qualitätsmanagement—Tradition und Zukunft. Festschrift zum 50-jährigen Bestehen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Qualität e.V., ed. by W. Masing et al. (Hanser, München, 2003), pp. 389–418
D.H. Meadows, J. Randers, D.L. Meadows, The Limits to Growth (Universe Books, New York, 1972)
L. Merz, Philosophie des Reaktorschutzes. atw, 118–126 (1970)
L. Merz, Restrisiko. Das Doppelgesicht der Reaktorsicherheit. atw, 294–298 (1981)
P. Miranti, Corporate learning and quality control at the bell system, 1877–1929. Bus. Hist. Rev. 79, 39–72 (2005)
W. Poundstone, Prisoner’s Dilemma (Anchor Book/Doubleday, New York, 1993)
President Eisenhower’s, “Atoms for Peace” Speech, 1953. Available at http://www.atomicarchive.com/Docs/Deterrence/Atomsforpeace.shtml
Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 2005. Available at http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s109-865
Profile—John Garrick: nuclear risk assessment pioneer. Risk Anal. 29, 935–939 (2009)
A. Rip, The mutual dependence of risk research and political context. Sci. Technol. Stud. 4, 3–15 (2001)
G.A. Ritter, Der Sozialstaat: Entstehung und Entwicklung im internationalen Vergleich (Oldenbourg, München, 1991)
C.A. Rosenberg, The Cholera Years: The United States in 1832, 1849, and 1866 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1962)
N. Rosenberg, The direction of technological change: inducement. Mechanisms and focusing devices. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 18, 1–24 (1969)
T. Schlich, Einführung. Die Kontrolle notwendiger Krankheitsursachen als Strategie der Krankheitsbeherrschung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, in Strategien der Kausalität: Konzepte der Krankheitsverursachung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert, ed. by C. Gradmann, T. Schlich (Centaurus, Pfaffenweiler, 1999), pp. 3–28
H. Schulz, O. Basler (eds.), Deutsches Fremdwörterbuch (Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1977), p. 452
B. Sinclair, Philadelphia’s Philosopher Mechanics: A History of the Franklin Institute, 1824–1865 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1974)
B. Sinclair, A Centennial History of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1980)
D.F. Smith, J. Phillips (eds.), Food, Science, Policy and Regulation in the Twentieth Century: International and Comparative Perspectives (Routledge, New York, 2000)
W.H. Sperber, R.F. Stier, Happy 50th birthday to HACCP: retrospective and prospective. Food Saf. Mag. (December 2009/January 2010). Available at http://www.foodsafetymagazine.com/article.asp?id=3481
U. Spiekermann, Redefining food: the standardization of products and the production in Europe and the United States, 1880–1914. Hist. Technol. 27, 11–36 (2001)
J.E. Stott, P.T. Britton, R.W. Ring, F. Hark, G.S. Hatfield, Common cause failure modeling: aerospace vs nuclear (2010). Available at http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20100025991_2010028311.pdf
T. Tietjen, D.H. Müller, FMEA Praxis. Das Komplettpaket für Training und Anwendung (Hanser, München, 2003), pp. 4–5
S. Walker, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, A Short History of Nuclear Regulation, 1946–1999 (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, 2000), pp. 41–42
A.M. Weinberg, Science and trans-science. Minerva 10, 209–222 (1972)
A.M. Weinberg, Reflections on risk assessment. Risk Anal. 1, 5–7 (1981)
R. Williams, Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (Oxford University Press, New York, 1983)
A.S. Wohl, Endangered Lives: Public Health in Victorian Britain (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1983)
K. Zachmann, Grenzenlose Machbarkeit und unbegrenzte Haltbarkeit? Das „friedliche Atom“ im Dienst der Land- und Ernährungswirtschaft. Technikgeschichte 78, 231–253 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zachmann, K. (2014). Risk in Historical Perspective: Concepts, Contexts, and Conjunctions. In: Klüppelberg, C., Straub, D., Welpe, I. (eds) Risk - A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04486-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04486-6_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04485-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04486-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)