Abstract
Knudson [306] proposed a comprehensive model of attention that recognized the role of certain subcortical structures and implicit processes in decision-making behavior. Within that model, the guidance of working memory and the modulation of the strength of neural signals necessary to make choices and decisions remained a process under neocortical control. Despite input from underlying brain systems which operate implicitly, the proposal was based upon top-down volitional control. This is just one illustration of the persistent, perseverative focus on the role of the neocortex in human cognition. A significant body of neuroscientific evidence has emerged to challenge this type of cortico-centric viewpoint. Koziol and Budding [307] were arguably the first to integrate a substantive literature which emphasized the critical importance of subcortical structures in cognition, examining both explicit and implicit processes. That manuscript, which was primarily written for the practicing clinical neuropsychologist, focused upon the vertical organization of the brain. Implications for neuropsychological assessment were reviewed. Neuropsychological evaluation procedures and interpretative strategies were proposed. Volumes I and II of this current series on “the vertically organized brain” are essentially an update of the original 2009 manuscript. Since the submission and acceptance of Volume II in the late summer and mid-fall of 2013, considerable influential neuroscientific literature has emerged. Although this addendum was written to cover these relevant data points, the author readily admits that new findings are developing so rapidly that any review can no longer be considered “comprehensive.” Instead, all conclusions represent “interim” solutions. This addendum focuses only upon the literature published within the past few months to support, expand upon and further summarize the “conclusions” offered in the first two volumes of this series. However, since this new literature opened-up other related areas of investigation, a small handful of references available previously were included to illustrate and integrate certain critical points. This postscript is organized from the perspective of “bottom-up” phylogenetic development which captures the essence of the initial approach taken in 2009, and which is evident in Volume II.
“Change is the law of life. And those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future.”—John F. Kennedy
“In times of rapid change, experience could be your worst enemy.”—J. Paul Getty
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Knudsen, E.I., Fundamental components of attention. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2007. 30: p. 57-78.
Koziol, L.F. and D.E. Budding, Subcortical structures and cognition: implications for neuropsychological assessment. 2009, New York: Springer.
Buckner, R.L. and F.M. Krienen, The evolution of distributed association networks in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci, 2013. 17(12): p. 648-665.
Buckner, R.L., The cerebellum and cognitive function: 25 years of insight from anatomy and neuroimaging. Neuron, 2013. 80(3): p. 807-815.
Menon, V., Developmental pathways to functional brain networks: emerging principles. Trends Cogn Sci, 2013. 17(12): p. 627-640.
Arsalidou, M., E.G. Duerden, and M.J. Taylor, The centre of the brain: topographical model of motor, cognitive, affective, and somatosensory functions of the basal ganglia. Hum Brain Mapp, 2012. 34(11): p. 3031-3054.
Nayate, A., J.L. Bradshaw, and N.J. Rinehart, Autism and Asperger’s disorder: are they movement disorders involving the cerebellum and/or basal ganglia? Brain Res Bull, 2005. 67(4): p. 327-334.
Mittal, V.A., et al., Markers of basal ganglia dysfunction and conversion to psychosis: neurocognitive deficits and dyskinesias in the prodromal period. Biol Psychiatry, 2010. 68(1): p. 93-99.
Helie, S., S. Chakravarthy, and A.A. Moustafa, Exploring the cognitive and motor functions of the basal ganglia: an integrative review of computational cognitive neuroscience models. Front Comput Neurosci, 2013. 7(174): p. 1-16.
Mayor-Dubois, C., et al., Visuo-motor and cognitive procedural learning in children with basal ganglia pathology. Neuropsychologia, 2010. 48(7): p. 2009-2017.
Peron, J., et al., Subthalamic nucleus: a key structure for emotional component synchronization in humans. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2013. 37: p. 358-373.
Leunissen, I., et al., Subcortical volume analysis in traumatic brain injury: the importnacae of the fronto-striato-thalamic circuit in task switching. Cortex, 2013.
van Schouwenburg, M.R., et al., Cognitive flexibility depends on what matter microstructure of the basal ganglia. Neuropsychologia, 2014. 53: p. 171-177.
Ness, V. and C. Beste, The role of the striatum in goal activation of cascaded actions. Neuropsychologia, 2013. 51: p. 2562-2571.
Ullsperger, M., C. Danielmeier, and G. Jocham, Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior. Physiol Rev, 2014. 94(1): p. 35-79.
McGinty, V.B., et al., Emerging, reemerging, and forgotten brain areas of the reward circuit: notes from the2010 motivational neural networks conference. Behav Brain Res, 2011. 20(1): p. 348-357.
Eppinger, B., et al., Of goals and habits: age-related and individual differences in goal-directed decision-making. Front Neurosci, 2013. 7: p. 253.
Ryterska, A., M. Jahanshahi, and M. Osman, What are people with Parkinson’s disease really imapired on when it comes to making decisions? A meta-analysis of the evidence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2013. 37: p. 2836-2846.
van Schouwenburg, M.R., H.E.M. den Ouden, and R. Cools, Selective attentional enhancement and inhibition of fronto-posterior connectivity by the basal ganglia during attention switching. Cereb Cortex, 2013: p. bht345.
Paul, E.J. and F.G. Ashby, A neurocomputational theory of how explicit learning bootstraps early procedural learning. Front Comput Neurosci, 2013. 7(177): p. 1-17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koziol, L.F. (2014). Addendum. In: The Myth of Executive Functioning. SpringerBriefs in Neuroscience(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04477-4_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04477-4_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04476-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04477-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)