Skip to main content

Addendum

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Myth of Executive Functioning

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Neuroscience ((TVOBTP))

  • 1731 Accesses

Abstract

Knudson [306] proposed a comprehensive model of attention that recognized the role of certain subcortical structures and implicit processes in decision-making behavior. Within that model, the guidance of working memory and the modulation of the strength of neural signals necessary to make choices and decisions remained a process under neocortical control. Despite input from underlying brain systems which operate implicitly, the proposal was based upon top-down volitional control. This is just one illustration of the persistent, perseverative focus on the role of the neocortex in human cognition. A significant body of neuroscientific evidence has emerged to challenge this type of cortico-centric viewpoint. Koziol and Budding [307] were arguably the first to integrate a substantive literature which emphasized the critical importance of subcortical structures in cognition, examining both explicit and implicit processes. That manuscript, which was primarily written for the practicing clinical neuropsychologist, focused upon the vertical organization of the brain. Implications for neuropsychological assessment were reviewed. Neuropsychological evaluation procedures and interpretative strategies were proposed. Volumes I and II of this current series on “the vertically organized brain” are essentially an update of the original 2009 manuscript. Since the submission and acceptance of Volume II in the late summer and mid-fall of 2013, considerable influential neuroscientific literature has emerged. Although this addendum was written to cover these relevant data points, the author readily admits that new findings are developing so rapidly that any review can no longer be considered “comprehensive.” Instead, all conclusions represent “interim” solutions. This addendum focuses only upon the literature published within the past few months to support, expand upon and further summarize the “conclusions” offered in the first two volumes of this series. However, since this new literature opened-up other related areas of investigation, a small handful of references available previously were included to illustrate and integrate certain critical points. This postscript is organized from the perspective of “bottom-up” phylogenetic development which captures the essence of the initial approach taken in 2009, and which is evident in Volume II.

“Change is the law of life. And those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future.”—John F. Kennedy

“In times of rapid change, experience could be your worst enemy.”—J. Paul Getty

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Knudsen, E.I., Fundamental components of attention. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2007. 30: p. 57-78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Koziol, L.F. and D.E. Budding, Subcortical structures and cognition: implications for neuropsychological assessment. 2009, New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Buckner, R.L. and F.M. Krienen, The evolution of distributed association networks in the human brain. Trends Cogn Sci, 2013. 17(12): p. 648-665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buckner, R.L., The cerebellum and cognitive function: 25 years of insight from anatomy and neuroimaging. Neuron, 2013. 80(3): p. 807-815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Menon, V., Developmental pathways to functional brain networks: emerging principles. Trends Cogn Sci, 2013. 17(12): p. 627-640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arsalidou, M., E.G. Duerden, and M.J. Taylor, The centre of the brain: topographical model of motor, cognitive, affective, and somatosensory functions of the basal ganglia. Hum Brain Mapp, 2012. 34(11): p. 3031-3054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nayate, A., J.L. Bradshaw, and N.J. Rinehart, Autism and Asperger’s disorder: are they movement disorders involving the cerebellum and/or basal ganglia? Brain Res Bull, 2005. 67(4): p. 327-334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mittal, V.A., et al., Markers of basal ganglia dysfunction and conversion to psychosis: neurocognitive deficits and dyskinesias in the prodromal period. Biol Psychiatry, 2010. 68(1): p. 93-99.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Helie, S., S. Chakravarthy, and A.A. Moustafa, Exploring the cognitive and motor functions of the basal ganglia: an integrative review of computational cognitive neuroscience models. Front Comput Neurosci, 2013. 7(174): p. 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mayor-Dubois, C., et al., Visuo-motor and cognitive procedural learning in children with basal ganglia pathology. Neuropsychologia, 2010. 48(7): p. 2009-2017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peron, J., et al., Subthalamic nucleus: a key structure for emotional component synchronization in humans. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2013. 37: p. 358-373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leunissen, I., et al., Subcortical volume analysis in traumatic brain injury: the importnacae of the fronto-striato-thalamic circuit in task switching. Cortex, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  13. van Schouwenburg, M.R., et al., Cognitive flexibility depends on what matter microstructure of the basal ganglia. Neuropsychologia, 2014. 53: p. 171-177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ness, V. and C. Beste, The role of the striatum in goal activation of cascaded actions. Neuropsychologia, 2013. 51: p. 2562-2571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ullsperger, M., C. Danielmeier, and G. Jocham, Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior. Physiol Rev, 2014. 94(1): p. 35-79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McGinty, V.B., et al., Emerging, reemerging, and forgotten brain areas of the reward circuit: notes from the2010 motivational neural networks conference. Behav Brain Res, 2011. 20(1): p. 348-357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Eppinger, B., et al., Of goals and habits: age-related and individual differences in goal-directed decision-making. Front Neurosci, 2013. 7: p. 253.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ryterska, A., M. Jahanshahi, and M. Osman, What are people with Parkinson’s disease really imapired on when it comes to making decisions? A meta-analysis of the evidence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2013. 37: p. 2836-2846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Schouwenburg, M.R., H.E.M. den Ouden, and R. Cools, Selective attentional enhancement and inhibition of fronto-posterior connectivity by the basal ganglia during attention switching. Cereb Cortex, 2013: p. bht345.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paul, E.J. and F.G. Ashby, A neurocomputational theory of how explicit learning bootstraps early procedural learning. Front Comput Neurosci, 2013. 7(177): p. 1-17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koziol, L.F. (2014). Addendum. In: The Myth of Executive Functioning. SpringerBriefs in Neuroscience(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04477-4_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics