Skip to main content

The Roles of Dispute Resolution in Construction Contracts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Construction Dispute Research
  • 2668 Accesses

Abstract

Dispute resolution clause sets out the procedure to settle disagreements that arise out of the contract. It also provides a gap fulfilling function to deal with unanticipated happenings. This chapter first provides a functional analysis of construction contract. The analysis explains the purposes and the inter-relationship among contract clauses. Whilst a number of dispute resolution mechanisms are available, it is advocated that the choice of mechanism should take into account the characteristics of the transaction. A mapping framework is proposed for this purpose. The use of the framework is illustrated by mapping dispute resolution mechanisms with four types of construction contract: main contract, nominated sub-contract, domestic sub-contract and direct labour contract.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alsagoff, S. A., & McDermott, P. (1994). Relational contracting: a prognosis for the UK construction industry? In Proceedings of the CIB W92 Conference, December 1994, University of Hong Kong, pp. 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxendale, T., & Greaves, D. (1997). Competitive partnering—A link between contractor and subcontractor. In Proceedings of the CIB W92 Symposium on Procurement, University of Montreal, pp. 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Construction Industry Review Committee (CIRC) (2001). Construct for Excellence, Construction Industry Review Committee, the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. O., & Pang, H. Y. (2013). Anatomy of construction disputes. The Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(1), 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, J. (1998). Rethinking Construction, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, The Government of the United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellows, R. (1997). The culture of partnering. In Proceedings of the CIB W92 Symposium on Procurement, University of Montreal, pp. 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanbury, W. (1992). Alternative dispute resolution—The Australian model. Solicitors Journal, April, 334–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • HKHA (2000). Quality housing, partnering for change. The Hong Kong Housing Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, W. P., & Greenwood, D. G. (1996). The standardization of contracts for construction. International Construction Law Review, 13(2), 196–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwayke, A.A. (1993). Alternative dispute resolution in construction. Chartered Institute of Building, Occasional Paper no. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, M. (1994). Constructing the Team: Final Report of a Joint Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the United Kingdom Construction Industry, HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, B. (1994). Contracts and specific investment: An empirical test of transaction cost theory. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 3(2), 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, B., & Mehta J. (1997). Private sector business contracts: The text between the lines. In S. Deakin & J. Michie (Eds.), Contracts, co-operation and competition, studies in economics, management, and law (pp. 43–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil, I. R. (1974). The many futures of contracts. Southern California Law Review, 47, 688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil, I. R. (1975). A primer of contract planning. Southern California Law Review, 48, 627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil, I. R. (1978). Contracts: Adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwestern University Law Review, 72, 854.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, P. (1990). Alternate forms of dispute resolution—Their strengths and weakness. Construction Law Journal, 6(3), 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pengilley, W. (1990). Alternative dispute resolution: The philosophy and the need. Australian Dispute Resolution Journal, 1(2), 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipanowich, T. J., & Henderson, D. A. (1992). Settling construction disputes by mediation, mini-trials and other processes—The ABA forum survey. Construction Lawyer, pp. 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Totterdill, B. W. (1991). Does the construction industry need ADR? Construction Law Journal, 8(3), 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, D. (1994). Building contracts: A practical guide. London: Longman Scientific & Technical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrril, J. (1992). Construction industry dispute resolution—A brief overview. Australian Dispute Resolution Journal, 3(3), 167–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. The Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 233–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sai On Cheung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cheung, S.O. (2014). The Roles of Dispute Resolution in Construction Contracts. In: Cheung, S. (eds) Construction Dispute Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04429-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04429-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04428-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04429-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics