Skip to main content

Comparison Between a Multidisciplinary and a Monodisciplinary Approach to Prostate Cancer: Our 1-Year Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multidisciplinary Management of Prostate Cancer

Abstract

We analysed the characteristics of patients included in our Prostate Unit (Group A), some results obtained from the early diagnosis programme and the distribution of prostate cancer (PC) cases in the different treatment options. These data were compared with those obtained in a monodisciplinary urological service (Group B). 292 cases were considered suitable and were included by our multidisciplinary team (MDT) in the Unit (Group A). 145 cases in which the diagnosis was unestablished started an early diagnosis programme for PC. Mean time for concluding all the initial programme till the histological diagnosis at prostate biopsy was 22.3 ± 5.4 days in Group A (32.7 ± 8.6 days in Group B). The rate of biopsy indications and that of PC positive biopsies were 64 % and 45 %, respectively, for cases included in Group A and 52 % and 41 % for cases included in Group B. A high percentage of cases (47.6 %) referred to our MDT were in the low-risk group. In the Prostate cancer Unit (Group A), the indications for primary therapies were more equally distributed between surgery (51.5 %) and radiotherapy (45.4 %).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M (2011) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer Part I. Eur Urol 59(1):61–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellardita L, Donegani S, Spattezzi A, Valdagni R (2011) Multidisciplinary versus one-on-one setting: a qualitative study of clinicians’ perceptions of their relationship with patients with prostate cancer. J Oncol Pract 7(1):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gomella L, Lin J, Hoffman-Censis J (2010) Enhancing prostate cancer care through the multidisciplinary clinic approach: a 15-year experience. J Oncol Pract 6(6):5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van Belle S (2008) How to implement the multidisciplinary approach in prostate cancer management: the Belgian model. BJU Int 101(suppl 2):2–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Montagut C, Albanell J, Bellmunt J (2008) Prostate cancer multidisciplinary approach: a key to success. Clin Rev Oncol Hematol 68S:32–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Valdagni R, Peter A, Bangma C (2011) The requirements of a specialist Prostate Cancer Unit: a discussion paper from the European School of Oncology. Eur J Cancer 47:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sciarra A, Panebianco V, Ciccariello M (2010) Value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging and dynamic contrast enhanced imaging for detecting prostate cancer foci in men with prior negative biopsy. Clin Cancer Res 16(6):1875.83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heidenreich A, Bolla M, Joniau S (2012) Prostate cancer. In: European Association Urology guidelines. EAU, Arnhem, pp 9–10

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sommers BD, Beard CJ, D’Amico AV (2008) Predictors of patients preferences and treatment choices for localized prostate cancer. Cancer 113:2058–2067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Flessing A, Jenkins V, Cat S, Fallowfield L (2006) Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective? Lancet Oncol 7(11):935–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Houssami N, Sainsbury R (2006) Breast cancer: multidisciplinary care and clinical outcomes. Eur J Cancer 42(15):2480–2491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Davies AR, Deans DAC, Penman I (2006) The multidisciplinary team meeting improves staging accuracy and treatment selection for gastro-esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 19(6):496–503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Magnani T, Valdagni R, Salvioni R (2012) The 6-year attendance of a multidisciplinary prostate cancer clinic in Italy: incidence of management changes. Br J Urol Int 110(7):998–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Valdagni R (2011) Prostate cancer units: has the time come to discuss this thorny issue and promote their establishment in Europe? Eur Urol 60:1193–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Denis L (2011) Prostate Cancer Units: the patients’ perspective. Eur Urol 60:1200–1201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Sciarra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sciarra, A., Gentile, V., Gentilucci, A. (2014). Comparison Between a Multidisciplinary and a Monodisciplinary Approach to Prostate Cancer: Our 1-Year Experience. In: Gentile, V., Panebianco, V., Sciarra, A. (eds) Multidisciplinary Management of Prostate Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04385-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04385-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04384-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04385-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics