Skip to main content

The Dynamics of Disability and Labour Force Participation in Italy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disadvantaged Workers

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of disability on labour force participation in Italy. Using information on limitations to daily activities, we apply a dynamic probit model accounting for state dependence and endogenous initial conditions to the longitudinal section of the 2004–2007 IT-SILC data. We find a significant and negative impact on current disability status that increases in seriousness (from 6.5 % to 10.7 %) in the case of labour force participation. Additionally, past disability status decreases the probability of current employment. Moreover, we find evidence that labour market participation is negatively affected by persistence in disability status (from 12.4 % to 28.1 % according to the seriousness of the limitations) and by the onset of disability (from 6.9 % to 11.3 %). Furthermore, we find that observable factors have a standard effect on labour market participation. Finally, we find evidence of true state dependence and endogenous initial conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Parodi and Sciulli (2008) have shown that the presence of disabled members in the household and the inadequacy of caring services reduce the labour market participation of the non-disabled household partner.

  2. 2.

    Studies investigating the labour market outcomes of disabled people focus on job satisfaction (Pagan and Malo 2009) and unemployment duration (Sciulli et al. 2012).

  3. 3.

    This is the case in Italy, where Law 68/1999 requires unemployed individuals (as well as employers) to register with employment centres before they can be hired under the law’s special provisions.

  4. 4.

    In the USA, this group largely includes women, non-whites, high school drop-outs, and former blue-collar workers (Kreider 1999).

  5. 5.

    Kreider (1999) treats reporting bias as a censored sample problem in which responses are assumed to be reliable, on average, for workers but of unknown quality for non-workers and constructs a continuous index of “true” disability. This continuous index is more reliable than a discrete indicator. Kreider and Pepper (2007) extend work on corrupt samples, and develop a set of nonparametric bounds that, in the most basic setting, require only prior information restricting the fraction of persons who may misreport disability.

  6. 6.

    Specifically, 13,335 individuals were interviewed in 2004, 24,769 in 2005, 35,336 in 2006 and 31,663 in 2007. Among households interviewed in 2004, 11,151 were also interviewed in 2005, 8,836 in 2006 and 6,893 in 2007.

  7. 7.

    Alternative definitions include those based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF, WHO 2001). In this definition, an individual’s autonomy depends on the characteristics of the context where she lives and operates (capability approach). An alternative approach is the strictly institutional one in which disabled individuals are considered disabled according to whether the institutional system has certified them as such, and who receive disability benefits. The latter approach is prone to bias determined by fraud or by the possible governmental choice of using disability benefits as an instrument of financial support to poor people (for Italy, see Agovino and Parodi 2012).

  8. 8.

    A shortcoming of this definition is the possible bias linked to self-assessment. However, it is flexible enough to accommodate different individual perceptions of given limitations.

  9. 9.

    See Gannon (2005), Parodi and Sciulli (2012a) and Davila-Quintana and Malo (2012) for various applications of this approach in economics of disability topics.

  10. 10.

    Estimates of time-averaged variables are reported in Table 3.6.

References

  • Agovino M, Parodi G (2012) Civilian disability pensions as an antipoverty policy instrument? A spatial analysis of Italian Provinces, 2003–2005. In: Parodi G, Sciulli D (eds) Social exclusion. Short and long term causes and consequences. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Agovino M, Rapposelli A (2011) Inclusion of disabled people in the Italian labour market: an efficiency analysis of Law 68/99 at regional level. Qual Quant 47(3):1577–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agovino M, Rapposelli A (2012) Employment of disabled people according to Law 68/99. A multidimensional analysis at regional level, Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, vol 1/2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Agovino M, Rapposelli A (2013) Employment of disabled people in the private sector. An analysis at the level of Italian Provinces according to article 13 of Law 68/1999. Qual Quant. doi: 10.1007/s11135-013-9851-3

  • Bound J, Burkhauser RV (1999) Economic analysis of transfer programs targeted on people with disabilities. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 3C. Elsevier, North Holland, pp 3417–3528

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhauser RV, Daly MC, Houteniville AJ, Nargis N (2001) The employment of working-age people with disabilities in the 1980s and 1990s what current data can and cannot tell us, Working Paper No 2001–20. FRB of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Davila-Quintana CD, Malo MA (2012) Poverty dynamics and disability: an empirical exercise using the European community household panel. J Socioecon 41(4):350–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupré D, Karjalainen A (2003) Employment of disabled people in Europe in 2002; Statistics in focus, population and social conditions, theme 3. Eurostat, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannon B (2005) A dynamic analysis of disability and labour force participation in Ireland 1995–2000. Health Econ 14:925–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gannon B, Nolan B (2004) Disability and labour market participation in Ireland. Econ Soc Rev 35(2):135–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale T, Hayghe H, McNeil J (1998) Persons with disabilities: labor market activity 1994. Mon Labor Rev 121(9):3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman JJ (1981) The incidental parameters problem and the problem of initial conditions in estimating a discrete time-discrete data stochastic process. In: Manski CF, McFadden D (eds) Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 179–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotchkiss JL (2004) A closer look at the employment impact of the Americans with disabilities act. J Hum Resour 39(4):887–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hum D, Simpson W (1996) Canadians with disabilities and the labour market. Can Pub Policy 22(3):285–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MK (2008) Disability and the labour market: a review of the empirical evidence. J Econ Stud 35(5):405–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MK, Latreille PL, Sloane PJ (2006) Disability, gender and the British labour market. Oxford Econ Pap 58(3):407–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd MP, Sloane PJ, Ferko I (2000) Disability and the labour market: an analysis of British males. J Health Econ 19:961–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreider B (1999) Latent work disability and reporting bias. J Hum Resour 34(4):734–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreider B, Pepper JV (2007) Disability and employment: re-evaluating the evidence in light of reporting errors. J Am Stat Assoc 102:432–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra S (2008) The recent decline in the employment of person with disabilities in south Africa 1998–2006, Discussion Paper no 2008–12. Department of Economics, Fordham University, Bronx, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok WKC, Meyer BD, Charles KK, Achen AC (2008) A note on The longitudinal structure of earnings losses among work-limited disabled workers. J Hum Resour 43(3):721–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando N, Patrizio M (2006) Il collocamento mirato dei disabili: l’applicazione della Legge 68/1999 nella Provincia di Bolzano. In: Parodi G (ed) Aspetti socioeconomici della disabilità. Aracne editrice, Roma, pp 179–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagan R, Malo MA (2009) Job satisfaction and disability: lower expectations about jobs or a matter of health? Spanish Econ Rev 11:51–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parodi G, Sciulli D (2008) Disability in Italian households: income poverty and labour market participation. Appl Econ 40(20):2615–2630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parodi G, Sciulli D (2012a) Disability and low income persistence in Italian households. Int J Manpower 33(1):9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parodi G, Sciulli D (2012b) Disability and social exclusion dynamics in Italian households, MPRA Paper no 42445. University Library of Munich, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciulli D, Gomes de Menezes A, Cabral VJ (2012) Unemployment duration and disability: evidence from Portugal. J Labor Res 33(1):21–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloane PJ, Jones MK (2012) Disability and social exclusion. In: Parodi G, Sciulli D (eds) Social exclusion. Short and long term causes and consequences. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern S (1989) Measuring the effect of disability on labor force participation. J Hum Resour 24:361–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2001) International classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins R (2004) The effects of disability on labour force in Australia. Aust Econ Rev 37(4):359–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge J (2005) Simple solution to the initial condition problem in dynamic, non-linear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. J Appl Econ 20:39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dario Sciulli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.6.

Table 3.6 Estimated coefficients of time-averaged covariates

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Agovino, M., Parodi, G., Sciulli, D. (2014). The Dynamics of Disability and Labour Force Participation in Italy. In: Malo, M., Sciulli, D. (eds) Disadvantaged Workers. AIEL Series in Labour Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04376-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics