Skip to main content

SP-AHP: An IT System for Collaborative Multi-criteria Decision-Making

  • Conference paper
Digital Enterprise Design & Management

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 261))

  • 1861 Accesses

Abstract

The decision-making in product and production engineering, such as the selection of an optimal design alternative, has to incorporatemultiple, often conflicting decision criteria (e. g., cost, technical quality, and the environmental impact) as well as the corresponding domain experts in the decision process. Since companies are faced with competitive pressure resulting in cost and time restrictions, an appropriate IT system supporting rapid and nevertheless accurate decision processes is highly recommended. This article presents the web-based IT system SP-AHP that provides the solution to multi-criteria, multi-stakeholder decision problems. In particular, a flexible and easy-to-use approach for collaborative decision-making as well as the corresponding IT implementation is proposed. Moreover, the software architecture of the entire system and its functionalities are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buckley, J.: Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17(3), 233–247 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Dong, Y., Zhang, G., Hong, W.C., Xu, Y.: Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method. Decision Support Systems 49(3), 281–289 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrogott, M. (eds.): Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Int. Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol. 78. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Forman, E., Gass, S.: The analytic hierarchy process - an exposition. Operations Research 49(4), 469–486 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Forman, E., Peniwati, K.: Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 108(1), 165–169 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Harker, P.: Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process. Mathematical Modelling 9(11), 837–848 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrera-Viedma, E., Alonso, S., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F.: A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 15(5), 863–877 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishizaka, A., Labib, A.: Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: Benefits and limitations. ORInsight 22(4), 201–220 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lindemann, U., Stetter, R., Viertlböck, M.: A pragmatic approach for supporting integrated product development. Journal of Integrated Design and Process Science 5(2), 39–51 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lootsma, F.A.: Scale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMART. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 2(2), 87–110 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. McCarthy, K.: Comment on the Analytic Delphi Method. Int. Journal of Production Economics 27(2), 135–136 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Niemann, J., Tichkiewitch, S., Westkämper, E. (eds.): Design of Sustainable Product Life Cycles. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reichel, T., Rünger, G.: Prioritization of product requirements using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: Proc. of the 14th Int. Conf. on Enterprise Information Systems ICEIS 2012, vol. 2, pp. 70–76. SciTePress (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reichel, T., Rünger, G.: Multi-criteria decision support for manufacturing process chains. Chemnitzer Informatik-Berichte CSR-13-02, TU Chemnitz (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rünger, G., Götze, U., Putz, M., Bierer, A., Lorenz, S., Reichel, T., Steger, D., Wenzel, K., Xu, H.: Development of energy-efficient products: Models, methods and IT support. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 4(2), 216–224 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Vincke, P.: Multicriteria Decision-aid, 1 edn. Wiley (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weiss, E., Rao, V.: AHP design issues for large-scale systems. Decision Sciences 18(1), 43–57 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Reichel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reichel, T., Rünger, G. (2014). SP-AHP: An IT System for Collaborative Multi-criteria Decision-Making. In: Benghozi, P., Krob, D., Lonjon, A., Panetto, H. (eds) Digital Enterprise Design & Management. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 261. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04313-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04313-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04312-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04313-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics