Opportunity and Innovation

Part of the International Studies in Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 30)


In the last chapter, “familiness” findings from the eight second-generation family businesses were presented on three dimensions and fifteen sub-dimensions. This chapter in turn will examine the entrepreneurial processes and innovations of these businesses.


Family Business Entrepreneurial Opportunity Potential Opportunity Entrepreneurial Process Innovation Outcome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abernathy, W. J. (1978). The productivity dilemma: Roadblock to innovation in the automobile industry. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abernathy, W. J., & Clark, K. B. (1985). Innovation: Mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy, 14(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40–47.Google Scholar
  4. Aldrich, H. E., & Kenworthy, A. (1999). The accidental entrepreneur: Campbellian antinomies and organizational foundings. In J. Baum & B. McKelvey (Eds.), Variations in organization science: In honor of Donald Campbell. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 41–56.Google Scholar
  6. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhave, M. (1994). A process model of entrepreneurial venture creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(3), 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bygrave, W., & Hofer, C. (1991). Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 13–22.Google Scholar
  9. Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur. Totowa, NJ: Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar
  10. Chell, E. (1986). The entrepreneurial personality: A review and some theoretical developments. In J. Curran, J. Stanworth & D. Watkins (Eds.), The survival of the small firm: The economics of survival and entrepreneurship (Vol. 1). Aldshot: Gower Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Cole, R. E. (2001). From continuous improvement to continuous innovation. Quality Management Journal, 8(4), 7–21.Google Scholar
  12. Companys, Y. E., & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Strategic entrepreneurs at work: The nature, discovery, and exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Small Business Economics, 28(4), 301–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cunningham, J. B., & Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
  14. Gartner, W. B. (1988). “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 11–32.Google Scholar
  15. Liles, P., (1974). Who are the entrepreneurs? MSU Business Topics, Vol. 22(1). Reprinted in P. Gorb, P. Dowell and P. Wilson (1981). Small Business Perspectives. London: Armstrong.Google Scholar
  16. McQuarrie, E. F., & Langmeyer, D. (1985). Using values to measure attitudes toward discontinuous innovation. Psychology and Marketing, 2(4), 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mortensen, P., & Bloch, C. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Porter, M. E. (1986). Competition in global industries. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  19. Robertson, T. S. (1967). The process of innovation and the diffusion of innovation. Journal of Marketing, 31(1), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–288.Google Scholar
  21. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Velamuri, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2003). Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shane, S., & Eckhardt, J. (2003). The individual-opportunity nexus. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
  27. Stevenson, H. H., Roberts, M. J., & Grousbeck, H. I. (1994). New business venture and the entrepreneur. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.Google Scholar
  28. Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1987). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(3), 439–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol. 3, pp. 119–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  30. Whittaker, D. H. (1999). Small firms in the Japanese economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Whittaker, D. H., Byosiere, P., Momose, S., Morishita, T., Quince, T., & Higuchi, J. (2009). Comparative entrepreneurship: The UK, Japan, and the shadow of silicon valley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zahra, S. A., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Entrepreneurship as a field of research: Encouraging dialogue and debate. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 8–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New Zealand Asia InstituteThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations