Poverty, Inequality and Unemployment: Socioeconomic Policy and Rawlsian Justice

Part of the SpringerBriefs in Economics book series (BRIEFSECONOMICS)


Among the main themes summarized in this chapter are those of contemporary features of poverty, unemployment and economic inequality. It is argued that these features can get worse if policies and strategies under government austerity are insensitive to the implications of such policies. In order that socioeconomic sustainability is better maintained it is suggested that adoption of the principles of Rawlsian justice be blended in the formulation of relevant financial and economic strategies.


Poverty Economic inequality Unemployment Government spending Socioeconomic policy Rawlsian justice 


  1. Ahmed, A. U., Hill, R. V., Smith, L. C., Wiesmann, D. M., & Frankenberger, T. (2007). The world’s most deprived: Characteristics and causes of extreme poverty and hunger (Discussion Paper #43). Washington, DC: IFPRI.Google Scholar
  2. Bernanke, B. (2013). The Economic Outlook Report-Comments Before the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress, Washington, DC, May 22, 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Briotti, M. G. (2005). Economic reactions to public finance consolidation: A survey of the literature, Frankfurt. European Central Bank Occasional Paper Series # 38.
  4. Coase, R. (1960). The Problem of Social Cost. Journal of Law & Economics, 3, 1–44.Google Scholar
  5. G-20. (2013). Task Force on Employment Activation Strategies for Stronger and More Inclusive Labour Markets: Key Policy Challenges and Good Practices prepared by the OECD.Google Scholar
  6. ILO. (2014). Global employment trends 2014: Risk of a jobless recovery?. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  7. ILO. (2013a). Concept note on the post-2015 development agenda: Jobs and livelihoods at the heart of the post-2015 development agenda. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  8. ILO. (2013b). Global employment trends for the youth 2013. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  9. ILO. (2013c). World of work report 2013. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  10. ILO. (2012). World of work report 2012. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  11. ILO. (2011). Social protection floor for a fair and inclusive globalization. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  12. OECD. (2014). Society at a Glance 2014: The crisis and its aftermath. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  13. OECD. (2013a). OECD’s employment outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  14. OECD. (2013b). How’s Life? Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  15. OECD. (2011). Divided we stand. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  16. Ortiz, I., Chai, J., Cummins, M., & Vergara, G. (2010). Prioritizing expenditures for a recovery for all: A rapid review of public expenditures in 126 developing countries. New York: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  17. Pogge, T. (2007). Severe poverty as a human rights violation. In T. Pogge (Ed.), Freedom from poverty as a human right. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Pogge, T. (2005). Real world justice. Journal of Ethics, 9, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rao, P. K. (2004). The economics of transaction costs: Theory, methods and applications. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Rao, P. K. (2014) Global Poverty: Resources and Institutions. Heidelberg: Springer VerlagGoogle Scholar
  21. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Shiller, R. (2013). The High Cost of Unemployment: It hurts the morale of a nation’s citizens, and austerity is no solution posted at (June 2, 2013).
  24. Torres, R., Kühn, S., Charpe, M., & ILO. (2013). Fiscal austerity is detrimental to output growth and employment. In R. Genevey, R. Pachauri & L. Tubiana (Eds.), Reducing inequalities: A sustainable development challenge. New Delhi: TERI Press.Google Scholar
  25. UN and World Bank. (2010). Natural hazards, unnatural disasters. Washington, DC: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. UNRISD. (2010). Combating poverty and inequality: Structural change, social policy and politics. Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Development ConsultantPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations