Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Business Process Maturity

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Business Process Management ((BRIEFSBPM))

Abstract

This chapter clarifies the context in which the research was conducted. By elaborating on the long history of business processes, it becomes an indispensable resource for management students, researchers, and practitioners. The essential facts of the industrial revolutions and quality management schools are combined with the official start of the process literature in the 1990s, characterised by reengineering and workflows. Also the influence of software engineering is discussed to explain the origin of maturity models, based on the tradition of CMMI, ISO/IEC 15504, FAA-iCMM and OMG-BPMM. Besides orienting readers to the book, the given background allows identifying a problem statement with knowledge issues in the current process literature. Although business process maturity models (BPMMs) turn out to be important aids for organisations, they are frequently criticised because many models exist without a theoretical foundation. This leads to the main research question for this book, requiring a methodological approach that follows behavioural-science and design-science paradigms. Throughout the studies covered in this book, theoretical findings will be altered with a content analysis of an unique sample of existing BPMMs. Particularly, this chapter presents a large overview of 69 BPMMs for generic processes, supply chains and collaboration processes, including references to be used by the readers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aberdeen Group (2006) Global supply chain benchmark report. Industry priorities for visibility, B2B collaboration, trade compliance, and risk management. https://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/igs/pdf/aberdeen-benchmark-report.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • Ahern DM, Clouse A, Turner R (2004) CMMI distilled. A practical introduction to integrated process improvement. SEI series in software engineering, 2nd edn. Pearson Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Alden JW (2007) Measuring process maturity: the business process maturity model. On the business transformation conference, Transformation & innovation 2007. http://www.slideshare.net/TransformationInnovation/measuring-process-maturity-the-business-process-maturity-model. Accessed 2 Dec 2009

  • Anderson DL, Lee HL (2000) The internet-enabled supply chain: from the “first click” to the “last mile”. In: Anderson DL (ed) Achieving supply chain excellence through technology, vol 2. Montgomery Research, pp 15–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Aouad G, Cooper R, Kagioglou M, Hinks J, Sexton M (1998) A synchronised process/IT model to support the co-maturation of processes and IT in the construction sector (CIB report). Time Research Institute, Salford

    Google Scholar 

  • Aouad G, Kagioglou M, Cooper R, Hinks J, Sexton M (1999) Technology management of IT in construction: a driver or an enabler? Logist Inf Manag 12(1/2):130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APQC (2007) Supply-chain council SCOR-mark survey. http://www.apqc.org/scc. Accessed 23 April 2010

  • Armistead C, Machin S (1997) Implications of business process management for operations management. Int J Oper Prod Manag 17(9):886–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryee G, Naim MM, Lalwani C (2008) Supply chain integration using a maturity scale. J Manufact Tech Manag 19(5):559–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attaran M (2004) Exploring the relationship between information technology and business process reengineering. Inf Manag (41):585–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Attaran M, Attaran S (2004) The rebirth of re-engineering: X-engineering. Bus Process Manag J 10(4):415–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers JB (2010a) Supply chain maturity self-assessment. http://ayers-consulting.com/SC%20Maturity%20Self%20Assessment.htm. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • Ayers JB (2010b) Supply chain project management. A structured collaborative and measurable approach, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu SC, Palvia PC (2000) Business process reengineering. In: Kent A (ed) Encyclopedia of library and information science, vol 67. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 24–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer B, Müller JP, Roser S (2006) A decentralized broker architecture for collaborative business process modelling and enactment. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on interoperability for enterprise software and applications, Bordeaux. Springer, London, pp 115–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Knackstedt R, Pöppelbuss J (2009) Developing maturity models for IT management. A procedure model and its application. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(3):213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Niehaves B, Pöppelbuss J, Simons A (2010) Maturity models in IS research. Proceedings of the 18th European conference on information systems, AIS Electronic Library, Pretoria, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckford J (2009) Quality. A critical introduction, 3rd edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisnez Management (2010) Business process management onderzoek 2009–2010. http://www.bisnez.org/files/Rapport_BPM_volwassenheid_onderzoek_2009_2010_def.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2010

  • Böhme T (2008) Supply chain integration: a case-based investigation of status, barriers, and paths to enhancement. The University of Waikato, Waikato

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone LM, Colaianni AJ, Hardison JR, Shafer JJ, Shepherd NJ, Ramaswamy MS et al (2009) The GAIA supply chain sustainability maturity model (Report IR927R1). http://www.lmi.org/Logistics/Documents/GAIA_Sustainable_Supply_Chain_Maturity_Model.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • BPM Institute (2010) 2010 BPM market assessment survey. http://2010stateofbpm.surveyconsole.com/. Accessed 20 June 2010

  • BPT Group (2008) Welcome to 8 Omega. Version 2.0. http://bptg.seniordev.co.uk/8omega.aspx. Accessed 20 June 2010

  • Buglione L (2009) Software engineering improvement. http://www.semq.eu/leng/proimpsw.htm. Accessed 25 Feb 2010

  • Burlton R (2010) Delivering business strategy through process management. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds), Handbook on business process management, vol 2. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 5–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlton TR (2001) Business process management: profiting from processes. Sams Publishing, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J, Sankaran J (2005) An inductive framework for enhancing supply chain integration. Int J Prod Res 43(16):3321–3351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr NG (2003) IT doesn’t matter. Harv Bus Rev 81(5):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • CGF (2010) The global scorecard. http://www.globalscorecard.net/. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • Champlin B (2008) Dimensions of business process change. https://www.bpminstitute.org/uploads/media/Champlin-6-25-08.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2010

  • Champy J (2002) X-engineering the corporation. Reinventing your business in the digital age. Warner Business Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang JF (2006) Business process management systems. Strategy and implementation. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicago Consulting (2010) Supply chain maturity. A self-assessment. http://www.chicago-consulting.com/supplyChainMaturityAssessment.shtml. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • Closs DJ, Mollenkopf DA (2004) A global supply chain framework. Ind Mark Manage 33:37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb CG (2003) From quality to business excellence. A systems approach to management. ASQ Quality Press, Wisconsin

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S, Roussel J (2005) Strategic supply chain management. The 5 disciplines for top performance. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs R, Hull R (2001) The politics of IT strategy and development in organizations. In: Dutton WH (ed) Information and communication technologies. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby PB (1979) Quality is free. The art of making quality certain. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis B, Alden J (2007) The business process maturity model: what, why and how. http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/02-07-COL-BPMMWhatWhyHow-CurtisAlden-Final.pdf. Accessed 2 Dec 2009

  • Curtis B, Hefley WE, Miller SA (2001) The people capability maturity model. Guidelines for improving the workforce. SEI series management of human resources. Pearson Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis B, Kellner MI, Over J (1992) Process modeling. Commun ACM 35(9):75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1993) Process innovation. Reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business School, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin T, Rosemann M (2007) Using the Delphi technique to identify BPM capability areas. Proceedings of the 18th Australasian conference on information systems, Toowoomba, pp 642–653, 5–7 Dec 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin T, Freeze R, Kulkarni U, Rosemann M (2005) Understanding the main phases of developing a maturity assessment model. Proceedings of the 16th Australasian conference on information systems. AISeL, Sydney, p 10, 29 Nov-2 Dec

    Google Scholar 

  • de Soria IM, Alonso J, Orue-Echevarria L, Vergara M (2009) Developing an enterprise collaboration maturity model: research challenges and future directions. Proceeding of the 15th international conference on concurrent enterprising. ICE, Leiden, 22–24 June 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Debevoise T (2007) Converging BPM and business rules maturity models. http://www.bpminstitute.org/articles/article/article/converging-bpm-and-business-rules-maturity-models.html. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • Deloitte (2010) Het business maturity model. http://www.deloitte.com/view/nl_NL/nl/diensten/consulting/strategy-operations/business-maturity-model/index.htm. Accessed 21 June 2010

  • Delphi Group (2002) BPM2002 market milestone report. White paper. Delphi Group, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming WE (1994) The new economics: for industry, government, education, 2nd edn. Center for Advanced Educational Services, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming WE (2000) Out of the crisis (originally published in 1982), 3rd edn. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • DeToro I, McCabe T (1997) How to stay flexible and elude fads. Qual Prog:55–60. March

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowdle P, Stevens J (2007) The process audit and PBM roadmap. A PBM program perspective. http://www.cam-i.org/docs/PBM_and_PEMM.pdf. Accessed 21 June 2010

  • Dowdle P, Stevens J, McCarty B, Daly D (2005) The process-based management loop. J Corp Account Finance:55–60. Jan

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer T (2006) BPMInstitute’s state of business process management. Assessing the current state of BPM awareness and usage. An executive white paper. http://www.bpminstitute.org/uploads/media/2006_State_of_BPM_-_EOY.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2010

  • Edwards C, Braganza A, Lambert R (2000) Understanding and managing process initiatives: A framework for developing consensus. Knowl Proc Manag 7(1):29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFQM (2010) EFQM—the official website. http://www.efqm.org. Accessed 11 Jan 2010

  • eKNOWtion (2009) Supply chain maturity monitor. http://www.eknowtion.com/phpQ/fillsurvey.php?sid=8. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • El Emam K, Birk A (2000) Validating the ISO/IEC 15504 measure of software requirements analysis process capability. IEEE Trans Software Eng 26(6):541–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enkawa T (2005) Logistics scorecard (LSC) in Japan. Logistics networks are successfully benchmarked in Japan? http://transportal.fi/Hankkeet/eglo/.383.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • FAA (2001) FAA-iCMM. Version 2.0. An integrated capability maturity model for enterprise-wide improvement. http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/aio/library/. Accessed 15 Mar 2010

  • FAA (2004) Safety and security extensions for integrated capability maturity models. http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/aio/library/. Accessed 15 Mar 2010

  • FAA (2006) FAA-iCMM appraisal method (FAM). Version 2.0. http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/aio/library/. Accessed 15 Mar 2010

  • Fisher DM (2004) The business process maturity model. A practical approach for identifying opportunities for optimization. http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/10-04%20ART%20BP%20Maturity%20Model%20-%20Fisher.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • Foggin JH, Mentzer JT, Monroe CL (2004) A supply chain diagnostic tool. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 34(10):827–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox C, Frakes W (1997) The quality approach: is it delivering? Commun Assoc Comput Mach 40(6):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser P, Farrukh C, Gregory M (2003) Managing product development collaborations—a process maturity approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf 217(11):1499–1519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich MT, Westbrook R (2001) Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. J Oper Manag 19:185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner RA (2004) The process-focused organization. A transition strategy for success. ASQ, Quality Press, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartner (2012) Gartner executive program’s worldwide survey of more than 2,300 CIOs shows flat IT budgets in 2012, but IT organizations must deliver on multiple priorities. http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1897514. Accessed 26 July 2012

  • Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Publishers, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethals F (2006) Classifying and assessing extended enterprise integration approaches. K.U.Leuven, Leuven

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q 30(3):611–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Hain S (2010) Developing a situational maturity model for collaboration (SiMMCo)—measuring organizational readiness. Proceedings of the fifth international conference DESTRIST. St. Gallen, DESTRIST, p 6, 4–5 June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (1990) Reengineering work: don’t automate, obliterate. Harv Bus Rev 68(4):104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (1996) Beyond reengineering. HarperCollins Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (2007) The process audit. Harv Bus Rev 4:111–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M, Champy J (2003) Reengineering the corporation. A manifesto for business revolution (originally published in 1993), 2nd edn. HarperCollins Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M, Stanton SA (1995) The reengineering revolution. A handbook. HarperCollins Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon P (2004) Evaluating an organization’s business process maturity. http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/03-04%20NL%20Eval%20BP%20Maturity%20-%20Harmon.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • Harmon P (2009). Process maturity models. http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/spotlight_051909.pdf. Accessed 24 Nov 2010

  • Harmon P (2010) Business process frameworks. http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/spotlight_03232010.pdf. Accessed 24 Nov 2010

  • Harrington HJ (1991) Business process improvement. The breakthrough strategy for total quality, productivity, and competitiveness. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington HJ (2006) Process management excellence. The art of excelling in process management. Book 1 in the five-part series. The five pillars of organizational excellence. Paton Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington HJ, Harrington JS (1995) Total improvement management. The next generation in performance improvement. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington HJ, Esseling EK, Van Nimwegen H (1997) Business process improvement workbook. Documentation, analysis, design, and management of business process improvement. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter DE, Slaughter SA (2000) Process maturity and software quality: a field study. Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on information systems. Association for Information Systems, Brisbane, pp 407–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design science in information systems research. MIS Q 28(1):75–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes J (1997) Building supply chain communities. http://criticalcomputing.com/. Accessed 24 April 2010

  • Holweg M, Disney S, Holmström J, Smaros J (2005) Supply chain collaboration: making sense of the strategy continuum. Europ Manag J 23(2):170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houy C, Fettke P, Loos P (2010) Empirical research in business process management—analysis of an emerging field of research. Bus Proc Manag J 16(4):619–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hüffner T (2004) The BPM maturity model—towards a framework for assessing the business process management maturity of organisations. GRIN, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey WS (1989) Managing the software process. SEI series in software engineering. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM (2007) The IBM global business services 2007 Mainland China value chain study. http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/index.wss/ibvstudy/gbs/a1028901?cntxt=a1005268#additional_resources. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • Ibrahim L, Pyster A (2004) A single model of process improvement. Lessons learned at the US federal aviation administration. IT Pro—IEEE Comp Soc:43–49. May-July

    Google Scholar 

  • IDS Scheer (2010) BPM maturity check. http://www.bpmmaturity.com/. Accessed 22 June 2010

  • ISO (2009) International Organization for Standardization—the official website. http://www.iso.org/. Accessed 6 Jan 2010

  • ISO/IEC (2003) Software engineering—process assessment—part 2: performing an assessment—ISO/IEC 15504-2:2003(E). ISO/IEC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC (2004a) Information technology—process assessment—part 1: concepts and vocabulary—ISO/IEC 15504-1:2004(E). ISO/IEC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC (2004b) Information technology—process assessment—part 3: guidance on performing an assessment—ISO/IEC 15504-3:2004(E). IS0/IEC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC (2004c) Information technology—process assessment—part 4: guidance on use for process improvement and process capability determination—ISO/IEC 15504-4:2004(E). ISO/IEC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC (2004d) Software engineering—process assessment—part 2: performing an assessment—technical corrigendum 1—ISO/IEC 15504-2:2003/Cor.1:2004(E). ISO/IEC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC (2008) Information technology—process assessment—part 7: assessment of organizational maturity—ISO/IEC TR 15504-7:2008(E). ISO/IEC, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISOSPICE (2010) ISOSPICE. http://www.isospice.com/. Accessed 26 Feb 2010

  • IT Governance Institute (2007) COBIT 4.1—framework, control objectives, management guidelines, maturity models. IT Governance Institute, Rolling Meadows

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonski S, Bussler C (1996) Workflow management: modeling concepts, architecture, and implementation. Int Thomson Comp Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang JJ, Klein G, Hwang H-G, Huang J, Hung S-Y (2004) An exploration of the relationship between software development process maturity and project performance. Inf Manag 41:279–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannengiesser U (2008) Subsuming the BPM life cycle in an ontological framework of designing. Proceedings of the CIAO! and EOMAS workshops, CAiSE. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 31–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2001) The strategy-focused organization. How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner MI, Madachy RJ, Raffo DM (1999) Software process simulation modeling: why? what? how? J Syst Softw 46(2/3):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalfan MM, Anumba CJ, Carrillo PM (2001) Development of a readiness assessment model for concurrent engineering in construction. Benchmarking: Int J 8(3):223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitto SC, Chesters J, Grbic C (2008) Quality in qualitative research. Criteria for authors and assessors in the submission and assessment of qualitative research articles for the Medical Journal of Australia. Med J Aust 188(4):243–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulpa MK, Johnson KA (2008) Interpreting the CMMI. A process improvement approach, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwak YH, Ibbs CW (2002) Project management process maturity (PM2) model. J Manag Eng 7:150–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity MC, Janson MA (1994) Understanding qualitative data: a framework of text analysis methods. J Manag Inf Syst 11(2):137–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Lee D, Kang S (2007) An overview of the business process maturity model (BPMM). In: Chang KC, Wang W, Chen L, Ellis CA, Hsu C, Tsoi AC et al Advances in web and network technologies, and information management APWeb/WAIM 2007 international workshops: DBMAN 2007, WebETrends 2007, PAIS 2007 and ASWAN 2007, Huang Shan, Chine. Proceedings. LNCS 4537, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 384–395, 16–18 June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Lee D, Kang S (2009) vPMM: a value based process maturity model. In: Lee R, Hu G, Miao H (eds) Computer and information science 2009. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 193–213

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lockamy A III, McCormack K (2004) The development of a supply chain management process maturity model using the concepts of business process orientation. Supply Chain Manag: Int J 9(4):272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockamy A III, McCormack K (2007) Supply chain maturity and performance. In: McCormack K (ed) Business process maturity. Theory and application. Booksurge Publishing, South Carolina, pp 105–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Luftman J (2004) Assessing business-IT alignment maturity. In: Van Grembergen W (ed) Strategies for information technology governance. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, pp 99–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Luyckx F (2007) IDS BPM roadmap assessment. http://www.ids-scheer.nl/set/2238/Overview%20BPM%20maturity%20model.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2010

  • Magdaleno AM, Cappelli C, Baiao FA, Santoro FM, Araujo R (2008) Towards collaboration maturity in business processes: an exploratory study in oil production processes. Inf Syst Manag 25:302–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier AM, Moultrie J, Clarkson JP (2009) Developing maturity grids for assessing organisational capabilities: practitioner guidance. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on management consulting, academy of management (MCD’09), 11–13 June 2008, Vienna, Austria. Management Consulting Division, Vienna, p 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier AM, Moultrie J, Clarkson PJ (2012) Assessing organizational capabilities: reviewing and guiding the development of maturity grids. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 59(1):138–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March ST, Smith GF (1995) Design and natural science research on information technology. Decis Support Syst 15(4):251–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maull RS, Tranfield DR, Maull W (2003) Factors characterising the maturity of BPR programmes. Int J Oper Prod Manag 23(6):596–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClaren T (2006) A measurement model for web-enabled supply chain integration. Paper 18. Proceedings of the 19th bled econference evalues, Bled, pp 1–13, 5–7 June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack K (2007a) BPO and business process maturity. In: McCormack K (ed) Business process maturity. Theory and application. Booksurge Publishing, South Carolina, pp 61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack K (2007b) Introduction to the theory of business process orientation. In: McCormack K (ed) Business process maturity. Theory and application. Booksurge Publishing, South Carolina, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack K (2007c) Supply chain management maturity. In: McCormack K (ed) Business process maturity. Theory and application. Booksurge Publishing, South Carolina, pp 73–103

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormack K, Johnson WC (2001) Business process orientation: gaining the e-business competitive advantage. St. Lucie Press, Florida

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack K, Ladeira MB, de Oliveira MP (2008) Supply chain maturity and performance in Brazil. Supply Chain Manag Int J 13(4):272–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGovern J, Ambler SW, Stevens ME, Linn J, Sharan V, Jo EK (2004) A practical guide to enterprise architecture. Pearson Education, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey (2011) A rising role for IT: McKinsey global survey results. https://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/High_Tech/Strategy_Analysis/A_rising_role_for_IT_McKinsey_Global_Survey_results_2900. Accessed 26 July 2012

  • Melenovsky MJ, Sinur J (2006) BPM maturity model identifies six phases for successful BPM adoption. Gartner Research, Stamford

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettler T, Rohner P (2009) Situational maturity models as instrumental artifacts for organizational design. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on DESRIST, Malvern, p 9, 7–8 May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollenkopf D, Dapiran GP (2005) The importance of developing logistics competencies: a study of Australian and New Zealand firms. Int J Logist: Res Appl 8(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JW (1999) An integrated collection of software engineering standards. IEEE Softw:51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Moultrie J, Clarkson PJ, Probert D (2007) Development of a design audit tool for SMEs. J Prod Innov Manag 24:335–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nave D (2002) How to compare Six Sigma, lean and the theory of constraints. A framework for choosing what’s best for your organization. Qual Prog:73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Netland TH, Alfnes E, Fauske H (2007) How mature is your supply chain? Supply chain maturity assessment test. Proceedings of the 14th EurOMA conference, managing operations in an expanding Europe, Ankara, Turkey. EurOMA, Bilkent University, Ankara, pp 1–10, 17–20 June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Netland T, Alfnes E (2008) A practical tool for supply chain improvement—experiences with the supply chain maturity assessment test (SCMAT). Proceedings of the 3rd world conference on production and operations management, Tokyo. Gakushuin University, Tokyo, pp 1–14, 5–8 Aug 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan RL (1973) Managing the computer resource. A stage hypothesis. Commun ACM 16(7):399–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O&i (2010) Doe nu de online BPM-scan. http://www.oi.nl/bpmscan/. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • OGC (2007) The official introduction to the ITIL service lifecycle. TSO—The Stationary Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • OGC (2010) Prince2. http://www.ogc.gov.uk/methods_prince_2__overview.asp. Accessed 11 May 2010

  • OMG (2008) Business process maturity model (BPMM). Version 1.0. http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMM/1.0/PDF. Accessed 2 Dec 2009

  • O’Neill P, Sohal AS (1999) Business process reengineering. A review of recent literature. Technovation 19:571–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Oracle (2008a) BPM lifecycle assessment. http://bpmready.nvishweb.com/. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • Oracle (2008b) State of the business process management market 2008. An Oracle white paper. http://www.oracle.com/technologies/bpm/docs/state-of-bpm-market-whitepaper.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2010

  • Ostolaza E, Garcia AB (1999) EFQM/SPICE integrated model. The business excellence road for software intensive organizations. Proceedings of the international conference on product focused software improvement, Oulu, Finland. University of Oulu, VTT Electronics, Oulu, pp 437–452, 22–24 June 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulk MC (2004) Surviving the quagmire of process models, integrated models, and standards. Proceedings of the American society for quality annual quality conference, Toronto, Canada, p 8. AIS Electronic Library, ASQ, Toronto, 24–27 May 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulk MC (2008) A taxonomy for improvement frameworks. Proceedings of the world congress for improvement frameworks. Bethesda, Maryland, p 15, 17 Sept 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulk MC, Weber CV, Curtis B, Chrissis MB (1995) The capability maturity model. Guidelines for improving the software process. SEI series in software engineering. Addison Wesleym, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S (2007) A design science research methodology for information systems research. J Manag Inf Syst 24(3):45–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesic AM (2009) Business process management maturity model and Six Sigma: An integrated approach for easier networking. Proceedings of the international conference on economics and management of networks, EMNet. Springer, Sarajevo, p 19, 3–5 Sept 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Plattfaut R, Niehaves B, Pöppelbuss J, Becker J (2011) Development of BPM capabilities—Is maturity the right path? Proceedings of 19th European conference on information systems. AIS Electronic Library, Helsinki, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomp MG, Batenburg RS (2010) Measuring chain digitisation maturity: an assessment of Dutch retail branches. Supply Chain Manag: Int J 15(3):227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poirier CC, Quinn FJ, Swink ML (2010) Diagnosing greatness. Ten traits of the best supply chains. J. Ross Publishing, Fort Lauderdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöppelbuss J, Röglinger M (2011) What makes a useful maturity model? A framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. Proceedings of the 19th European conference on information systems. AIS Electronic Library, Helsinki, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1985) Competitive advantage. Creating and sustaining superior performance. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard J-P, Armistead C (1999) Business process management—lessons from European business. Bus Proc Manag J 5(1):10–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramasubbu N, Krishnan MS (2005) Leveraging global resources: A process maturity framework for managing distributed software product development. Paper 386. Proceedings of AMCIS, Omaha, Nebraska, USA. AIS Electronic Library, University of Nebraska, Omaha, pp 3085–3090, 11–14 Aug 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravesteyn P, Jansen S (2009) A situational implementation method for business process management systems. Proceedings of the fifth Americas conference on information systems. AISeL, San Francisco, p 9, 6–9 Aug 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Remoreras G (2009) Achieving the highest level of process culture maturity. http://mysimpleprocesses.com. Accessed 1 June 2010

  • Renken J (2004) Developing an IS/ICT management capability maturity framework. Proceedings of the 2004 annual research conference of the South African Institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa. SAICSIT, Stellenbosch, pp 53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Riverola J (2001) A general approach to the case gathering phase. http://catalcatel.iese.edu/WEBSCM/Archivos/MaturityModel.pdf. Accessed 6 July 2010

  • Röglinger M, Pöppelbuss J, Becker J (2012) Maturity models in business process management. Bus Proc Manag J 18(2):328–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohloff M (2009a) Case study and maturity model for business process management implementation. In: Dayal U, Eder J, Koehler J, Reijers HA (eds) Business process management. 7th international conference, BPM 2009, Ulm, Germany. Proceedings. LNCS 5701, pp 128–142, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 8–10 Sept 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohloff M (2009b) Process management maturity assessment. Paper 631. Proceedings of the 15th Americas conference on information systems, San Fransisco, California. AISeL, San Fransisco, p 12, 6–9 Aug 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann M (2010) The service portfolio of a BPM center of excellence. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management 2. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 267–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann M, de Bruin T (2005a) Application of a holistic model for determining BPM maturity. http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/02-05%20WP%20Application%20of%20a%20Holistic%20Model-%20Rosemann-Bruin%20-%E2%80%A6.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2010

  • Rosemann M, de Bruin T (2005b) Towards a business process management maturity model. Proceedings of the 13th European conference on information systems, Regensburg, Germany. ECIS, Regensburg, p 12, 26–28 May 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann M, vom Brocke J (2010) The six core elements of business process management. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 1. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 107–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross JE, Omachon VK (2004) Principles of total quality, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Rout TP, El Emam K, Fusani M, Goldenson D, Jung H-W (2007) SPICE in retrospect: developing a standard for process assessment. J Syst Softw 80:1483–1493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummler-Brache Group (2004) Business process management in U.S. firms today. http://rummler-brache.com/upload/files/PPI_Research_Results.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • Santanen E, Kolfschoten G, Golla K (2006) The collaboration engineering maturity model. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, vol 1. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, p 16c

    Google Scholar 

  • Scavillo M (2008) Business process transformation in the software industry. http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/70559771-c266-2b10-1499-8c36e668e0a6?QuickLink=events&overridelayout=true. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • Scheer A-W (2007) BPM = business process management = business performance management. http://www.professor-scheer-bpm.com/BPM_Scheer_Business_Process_Management_en.pdf. Accessed 27 Apr 2010

  • Scheer A-W, Brabaender E (2009) BPM governance. The process of business process management. ARIS expert paper. IDS Scheer AG, Saarbruecken

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeldt TI (2008) A practical application of supply chain management principles. ASQ, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott JE (2007) Mobility, business process management, software sourcing, and maturity model trends: propositions for the IS Organization of the future. Inf Syst Manag 24:139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEI (1987) A method for assessing the software engineering capability of contractors. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/87tr023.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2010

  • SEI (1993) Capability maturity model for software. Version 1.1. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/93tr024.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2010

  • SEI (2000a) CMMI for systems engineering/software engineering. Version 1.02—continuous representation. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/00tr019.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2010

  • SEI (2000b) CMMI for systems engineering/software engineering. Version 1.02—staged representation. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/00tr018.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2010

  • SEI (2002a) CMMI for systems engineering, software engineering, integrated product and process development, and supplier sourcing. Version 1.1—continuous representation. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/02tr011.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2010

  • SEI (2002b) CMMI for systems engineering, software engineering, integrated product and process development, and supplier sourcing. Version 1.1—staged representation. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/02tr012.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2010

  • SEI (2006a) Appraisal requirements for CMMI. Version 1.2. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/06tr011.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2010

  • SEI (2006b) CMMI for development. Version 1.2. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/06tr008.pdf. Accessed 3 Dec 2009

  • SEI (2006c) Standard CMMI appraisal method for process improvement (SCAMPI) A. Version 1.2—method definition document. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/06hb002.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2010

  • SEI (2007) CMMI for acquisition. Version 1.2. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/07tr017.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2010

  • SEI (2009) CMMI for services. Version 1.2. http://www.sei.cmu.edu/reports/09tr001.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2010

  • Sheard SA (1997) The frameworks quagmire. Crosstalk: J Def Softw Eng 10(9):9

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheard SA (2001) Evolution of the frameworks quagmire. IEEE Comput 34(7):96–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shewhart WA (1980) Economic control of quality of manufactured product (Originally published in 1931), 2nd edn. American Society for Quality Control, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewhart WA (1986) Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control (Originally published in 1939), 2nd edn. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simatupang TM, Sridharan R (2005) The collaboration index: a measure for supply chain collaboration. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 35(1):44–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, 3rd edn. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon J-M, El Emam K, Rousseau S, Jacquet E, Babey F (1997) The reliability of ISO/IEC PDTR 15504 assessments. Softw Proc Improv Pract 3(3):177–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skjoett-Larsen T, Thernoe C, Andresen C (2003) Supply chain collaboration. Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 33(6):531–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrinjar R, Bosilj-Vuksic V, Stemberger MI (2008) The impact of business process orientation on financial and non-financial performance. Bus Proc Manag J 14(5):738–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skrinjar R, Stemberger MI, Hernaus T (2007) The impact of business process orientation on organizational performance. Proceedings of the 2007 informing science and IT education joint conference. Ljubljana, pp 171–185, 22–25 June 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Mazlish B (2002) The wealth of nations. Representative selections (Originally published in 1776), 4rd edn. Dover Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith H, Fingar P (2002, 2006) Business process management: the third wave. The breakthrough that defines competitive advantage for the next fifty years. Meghan-Kiffer Press, Tampa

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith H, Fingar P (2004) Process management maturity models. http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/07-04%20COL%20Maturity%20Models-%20Smith-Fingar.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • Spanyi A (2004a) Beyond process maturity to process competence. http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/06-04%20ART%20Dev%20Business%20Process%20Competence%20-%20Spanyi.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • Spanyi A (2004b) Towards process competence. http://www.spanyi.com/images/BPM%20Towards.pdf. Accessed 6 Apr 2010

  • Spekman RE, Carraway R (2006) Making the transition to collaborative buyer-seller relationships: an emerging framework. Ind Mark Manage 35:10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SQI (2007) SPICE. http://www.sqi.gu.edu.au/spice/. Accessed 1 Mar 2010

  • Stevens GC (1989) Integrating the supply chain. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 19(8):3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supply-Chain Council (2008) Supply-chain operations reference-model. SCOR overview. Version 9.0. http://archive.supply-chain.org/galleries/public-gallery/SCOR%209.0%20Overview%20Booklet.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2010

  • Tan KC (2001) A framework of supply chain management literature. Europ J Purch Supply Manag 7:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapia RS, Daneva M, van Eck P, Wieringa R (2008) Towards a business-IT alignment maturity model for collaborative networked organizations. Proceedings of the international workshop on enterprise interoperability, Munich, Germany, in conjunction with the 12th IEEE international EDOC conference, Munich, Germany. IEEE, Munich, pp 70–81, 15–19 Sept 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Thijs N, Bouckaert G (2007) Kwaliteit in de publieke sector: over het bos en de bomen. In: Thijs N, Bouckaert G (eds) Kwaliteit in beweging. Ervaringen met Kwaliteitsmanagement in Lokale Besturen. Vanden Broele, Brugge, pp 5–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolsma J, de Wit D (2009) Effectief procesmanagement. Procesgericht sturen met het BPM model, 2nd edn. Eburon, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Towers S (2009) 8 Omega ORCA. Organization readiness & competence assessment. http://www.slideshare.net/stowers/orca-overview. Accessed 20 June 2010

  • van den Bergh J (2010) Supply chain maturity scan. http://www.jvdbconsulting.com/supply-chain-maturity-scan.html. Accessed 23 June 2010

  • van Dooren W, Thijs N, Bouckaert G (2004) Quality management and the management of quality in European public administrations. In: Löffler E, Vintar M (eds) Improving the quality of East and West European public services. Ashgate Publishing, Hampshire, pp 91–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon H (2004) Process assessment and ISO/IEC 15504. A reference book. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van Steenbergen M, Bos R, Brinkkemper S, van de Weerd I, Bekkers W (2010) The design of focus area maturity models. Proceedings of DESRIST2010. Springer, St.Gallen, pp 317–332, 4–5 June 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • VICS (2004) Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR). An overview. http://www.vics.org/docs/standards/CPFR_Overview_US-A4.pdf. Accessed 14 June 2010

  • vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (2010) Foreword. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 2. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp vii–ix

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Brocke J, Sinnl T (2011) Culture in business process management: a literature review. Bus Proc Manag J 17(2):357–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls JG, Widmeyer GR, El Sawy OA (2004) Assessing information system design theory in perspective: how useful was our 1992 initial rendition? JITTA: J Inf Technol Theory Appl 6(2):43–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Weske M (2010) Business process management. Concepts, languages and architectures. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • WfMC (1999) Terminology & glossary. http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/TC-1011_term_glossary_v3.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2011

  • Willaert P, Van den Bergh J, Willems J, Deschoolmeester D (2007) The process-oriented organisation: a holistic view. Developing a framework for business process orientation maturity. In: Alonso G, Dadam P, Rosemann M (eds) Business process management. 5th international conference, BPM 2007, Brisbane, Australia. Proceedings. LNCS 4714. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–15, 24–28 Sept 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Windle S (2004) Book review. Business process management (BPM): the third wave. J Inf Syst:128–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter R (2008) Design science research in Europe. Europ J Inf Syst 17:470–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Wognum PM, Faber EC (2002) Infrastructures for collaboration in virtual organisations. Int J Netw Virtual Organ 1(1):32–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaibuathet K, Enkawa T, Suzuki S (2008) Influences of institutional environment toward the development of supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 115:262–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaibuathet K, Enkawa T, Yoshika T (2007) Impact of information technology and SCM organizational strategy on corporate financial performance and its cross national comparison. Int J Inf Syst Logist Manag 3(1):13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao LJ, Cheng HK (2005) Web services and process management: a union of convenience or a new area of research? Decis Support Syst 40:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • zur Muehlen M, Ho DT-Y (2006) Risk management in the BPM lifecycle. In: Bussler CJ, Haller A (eds) BPM 2005 international workshops, BPI, BPD, ENEI, BPRM, WSCOBPM, BPS, Nancy, France, Proceedings. LNCS 3812. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 454–466, 5 Sept 2005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy Van Looy .

Appendix: The Collected BPMMs (N = 69)

Appendix: The Collected BPMMs (N = 69)

ID

Author(s)

BPMM name

Reference(s)

(1) Business process

(1.1) Academic

AOU

Aouad, Cooper, Hinks, Kagioglou and Sexton

Co-maturation model for synchronising BP and IT

(Aouad et al. 1998, 1999)

ARM

Armistead, Machin and Pritchard

BPM’s degree of progress (as part of a larger survey)

(Armistead and Machin 1997; Pritchard and Armistead 1999)

DET

DeToro and McCabe

Process condition rating model

(DeToro and McCabe 1997)

HAM

Hammer

Process and enterprise maturity model (PEMM)

(Hammer 2007)

HAR1

Harrington

Process maturity grid

(Harrington 1991, 2006)

LEE

Lee, Lee and Kang

Value-based process maturity model (vPMM)

(Lee et al. 2007, 2009)

MAU

Maull, Tranfield and Maull

BPR maturity model

(Maull et al. 2003)

MCC1

McCormack and Johnson

BPO maturity model

(McCormack and Johnson 2001; McCormack 2007a, b)

ROH

Rohloff

Process management maturity assessment (PMMA)

(Rohloff 2009a, b)

ROS

Rosemann, de Bruin and Power

BPM maturity model

(de Bruin and Rosemann 2007; Hüffner 2004; Rosemann and de Bruin 2005a, b)

SEI

Software Engineering Institute (Carnegie Mellon University)

• Capability maturity model integration (CMMI)

(SEI 2000a, b, 2002a, b, 2006a, b, c, 2007, 2009)

• Standard CMMI appraisal method for process improvement (SCAMPI)

SKR

Skrinjar, Bosilj-Vuksic, Stemberger and Hernaus

BPO maturity model

(Skrinjar et al. 2007, 2008)

WIL

Willaert, Van den Bergh, Willems and Deschoolmeester

Holistic BPO maturity framework

(Willaert et al. 2007)

(1.2) Non-academic

BIS

Bisnez Management, Business and IT Trends Institute, students of Erasmus University, BPM magazine, information magazine

BPM maturity model (in Dutch: ‘BPM volwassenheidsmodel’)

(Bisnez Management 2010)

BPM

BPM Institute

State of BPM (part of a BPM survey)

(BPM Institute 2010; Dwyer 2006)

BPT

BP transformations group and BP group (previously BPM group)

8 Omega ORCA (Organisational readiness and capability assessment)

(BPT Group 2008; Towers 2009)

CAM1

CAM-I, Consortium for Advanced Management-International

Process-based management loop:

(Dowdle et al. 2005)

• discipline model (organisation’s current philosophy, business model, methods and tools)

• process-based management assessment model (components)

• process continuum model (levels)

CAM2

CAM-I, Consortium for Advanced Management-International

Process-based management assessment and implementation road map

(Dowdle and Stevens 2007)

CHA

Champlin (ABPMP)

Process management maturity model

(Champlin 2008)

DEL

Deloitte and Utrecht University

Business maturity model and scan

(Deloitte 2010)

ESI1

ESI, European Software Institute

EFQM/SPICE integrated model

(Ostolaza and Garcia 1999)

FAA

Federal aviation administration

• FAA integrated capability maturity model (FAA-iCMM)

(FAA 2001, 2004, 2006)

• FAA-iCMM appraisal method (FAM)

FIS

Fisher (bearing point)

Business process maturity model

(Fisher 2004)

GAR1

Gardner

Process improvement road map

(Gardner 2004)

GAR2

Gartner

BPM maturity and adoption model

(Melenovsky and Sinur 2006)

HAR2

Harmon (BPTrends)

Informal BP maturity evaluation model

(Harmon 2004)

IDS

IDS scheer, software AG

• BPM maturity check

(IDS Scheer 2010; Luyckx 2007; Scheer and Brabaender 2009)

• BPM road map assessment

ISO

ISO/IEC, International Organisation for Standardisation and International Electrotechnical Commission

ISO/IEC 15504

(ISO/IEC 2003, 2004a, b, c, d, 2008, ISOSPICE 2010; SQI 2007)

O&I

O&i

BPM scan

(O&i 2010; Tolsma and de Wit 2009)

OMG

Object management group

BPMM

(OMG 2008)

ORA

Oracle and BEA systems

BPM lifecycle assessment survey

(Oracle 2008a, b)

REM

Remoreras

Process culture maturity model

(Remoreras 2009)

RUM

Rummler-Brache group

Process performance index

(Rummler-Brache Group 2004)

SAP

SAP

Process maturity analysis and plan

(Scavillo 2008)

SCH1

Scheer

BPM check-up

(Scheer 2007)

SMI

Smith and Fingar

Process management maturity model (PMMM)

(Smith and Fingar 2004)

SPA

Spanyi

BP competence grid

(Spanyi 2004a; b)

(2) Supply chain

(2.1) Academic

ARY

Aryee, Naim and Lalwani

SC integration maturity model

(Aryee et al. 2008)

BOH

Böhme and Childerhouse

SC integration evaluation tool and maturity model

(Böhme 2008)

CAM3

Campbell and Sankaran

SC integration enhancement framework (SCIEF)

(Campbell and Sankaran 2005)

MCC2

McCormack et al.

SC management maturity model

(Lockamy III and McCormack 2004, 2007; McCormack 2007c, 2008)

MCL

McLaren

Web-enabled SC integration measurement model

(McClaren 2006)

MIC

Michigan State University

Twenty-first century logistics framework

(Closs and Mollenkopf 2004; Mollenkopf and Dapiran 2005)

NET

Netland, Alfnes and Fauske

SC maturity assessment test (SCMAT)

(Netland et al. 2007; Netland and Alfnes 2008)

RIV

Riverola

SC management—technology maturity model

(Riverola 2001)

TOK

Tokyo Institute of Technology

Logistics scorecard (LSC)

(Enkawa 2005; Yaibuathet et al. 2007, 2008)

(2.2) Non-academic

ABE

Aberdeen group

Global SC maturity framework

(AberdeenGroup 2006)

AND

Andersen consulting (accenture)

SC continuum

(Anderson and Lee 2000)

CGF

CGF, consumer goods forum (former GCI, global commerce initiative)

Global scorecard for efficient consumer response capability

(CGF 2010)

CGR

CGR management consulting

SC management maturity model

(Ayers 2010a, b)

CHI

Chicago consulting

SC maturity model

(Chicago Consulting 2010)

CSC

CSC, SC management review magazine and Michigan State University

• SC maturity model (until 2006)

(Poirier et al. 2010)

• Ten SC competencies (as from 2007)

EKN

eKNOWtion

SC maturity monitor (SCM2)

(eKNOWtion 2009)

IBM

IBM

SC maturity model

(IBM 2007)

JER

Jeroen van den Bergh Consulting and VU University Amsterdam

SC maturity scan

(van den Bergh 2010)

LMI

LMI Research Institute

GAIA SC sustainability maturity model

(Boone et al. 2009)

MAN

Manugistics and JDA software

SC compass

(Holmes 1997)

PMG

PMG and PRTM

SC maturity model

(Cohen and Roussel 2005)

SCC

SCC, supply chain council and APQC

SCORmark survey (for benchmarking, resulting in an improvement road map)

(APQC 2007; Supply-Chain Council 2008)

SCH2

Schoenfeldt

SC mgt maturity model

(Schoenfeldt 2008)

STE

Stevens

SC integration model

(Stevens 1989)

(3) Collaboration

(3.1) Academic

FRA

Fraser, Farrukh and Gregory

Collaboration maturity grid (for new product introduction and development)

(Fraser et al. 2003)

MAG

Magdaleno, Cappelli, Baiao, Santoro and Araujo

Collaboration maturity model (ColabMM)

(Magdaleno et al. 2008)

RAM

Ramasubbu and Krishnan

Process maturity framework for managing distributed software product development

(Ramasubbu and Krishnan 2005)

SIM

Simatupang and Sridharan

SC Collaboration index

(Simatupang and Sridharan 2005)

TAP

Tapia, Daneva, van Eck and Wieringa

IT-enabled collaborative networked organisations maturity model (ICoNOs MM)

(Tapia et al. 2008)

WOG

Wognum and Faber

Fast reactive extended enterprise—capability assessment framework (FREE-CAF)

(Wognum and Faber 2002)

(3.2) Non-academic

ESI2

European Software Institute

Enterprise collaboration maturity model

(de Soria et al. 2009)

VIC

Voluntary interindustry commerce standards

Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR) rollout readiness self-assessment

(VICS 2004)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Looy, A. (2014). Introduction. In: Business Process Maturity. SpringerBriefs in Business Process Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04202-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics