Abstract
In light field rendering (LFR), the geometric configuration of cameras concerns the rendering quality of virtual views. A mathematical model of coverage field (CF) is proposed in this paper to quantify the relationship between the rendering quality and the geometric configuration of cameras. We analyze the impact of changes in CF with the rendering quality by a set of positions of the virtual views and the geometric configuration of cameras. An optimization algorithm is also presented to optimize the geometric configuration of cameras with the help of CF. The experimental results show that the proposed CF can effectively quantify the quality of LFR, and can be used to optimize the geometric configuration of cameras.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Levoy, M., Hanrahan, P.: Light Field Rendering. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 31–42. ACM Press, New York (1996)
Zhang, C., Chen, T.: Active rearranged Capturing of Image-Based Rendering Scenes-Theory and Practice. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 9(3), 520–531 (2007)
Werner, T., Hlavac, V., Leonardis, A., Pajdla, T.: Selection of Reference Views for Image-based Representation. In: 13th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pp. 73–77. IEEE Press, Vienna (1996)
Fleishman, S., Cohen-Or, D., Lischinski, D.: Automatic Camera Placement for Image-Based Modeling. Computer Graphics Forum 19(2), 101–110 (2000)
Vaish, V., Wilburn, B., Joshi, N., Levoy, M.: Using Plane+Parallax for Calibrating Dense Camera Arrays. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–2. IEEE Press, Washington (2004)
Lin, Z., Wong, T.T., Shum, H.Y.: Relighting with the Reflected Irradiance Field: Representation, Sampling and Reconstruction. International Journal of Computer Vision 49(2-3), 229–246 (2002)
Gao, Y., Wang, M., Tao, D., Ji, R., Dai, Q.: 3D Object Retrieval and Recognition with Hypergraph Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 9(21), 4290–4303 (2012)
Gao, Y., Tang, J., Hong, R., Yan, S., Dai, Q., Zhang, N., Chua, T.S.: Camera Constraint-Free View-Based 3D Object Retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 4(21), 2269–2281 (2012)
Gao, Y., Wang, M., Zha, Z., Tian, Q., Dai, Q., Zhang, N.: Less is More: Efficient 3D Object Retrieval with Query View Selection. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 5(11), 1007–1018 (2011)
Gao, Y., Dai, Q., Zhang, N.Y.: 3D Model Comparison Using Spatial Structure Circular Descriptor. Pattern Recognition 43(3), 1142–1151 (2010)
Shen, J., Shepherd, J., Cui, B., Tan, K.L.: A Novel Framework for Efficient Automated Singer Identification in Large Music Databases. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)Â 27(3), 18 (2009)
Ji, R., Yao, H., Liu, W., Sun, X., Tian, Q.: Task-dependent Visual-codebook Compression. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 21(4), 2282–2293 (2012)
Ji, R., Duan, L.Y., Chen, J., Yao, H., Yuan, J., Rui, Y., Gao, W.: Location Discriminative Vocabulary Coding for Mobile Landmark Search. International Journal of Computer Vision 96(3), 290–314 (2012)
Liu, Q., Yang, Y., Ji, R., Gao, Y., Yu, L.: Cross-view Down/up-sampling Method for Multiview Depth Video Coding. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 19(5), 295–298 (2012)
Yang, Y., Liu, Q., Ji, R., Gao, Y.: Dynamic 3d Scene Depth Reconstruction Via Optical Flow Field Rectification. PLoS ONEÂ 7(11), e47041 (2012)
Yang, Y., Liu, Q., Ji, R., Gao, Y.: Remote Dynamic Three-Dimensional Scene Reconstruction. PLoS ONEÂ 8(5), e55586 (2013)
Yang, Y., Dai, Q.: Contourlet-based Image Quality Assessment for Synthesized Virtual Image. Electronics Letters 46(7), 492–494 (2010)
Nguyen, H.T., Do, M.N.: Error Analysis for Image-Based Rendering with Depth Information. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 18(4), 703–716 (2009)
Liu, S.X., An, P., Zhang, Z.Y., Zhang, Q., Shen, L.Q., Jiang, G.Y.: On the Relationship Between Multi-View Data Capturing and Quality of Rendered Virtual View. Imaging Science Journal 57(5), 250–259 (2009)
Shidanshidi, H., Safaei, F., Li, W.: A Quantitative Approach for Comparison and Evaluation of Light Field Rendering Techniques. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pp. 1–4. IEEE Press, Pennsylvania (2011)
Shidanshidi, H., Safaei, F., Li, W.: Objective Evaluation of Light Field Rendering Methods Using Effective Sampling Density. In: 13th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP), pp. 1–6. IEEE Press, Hangzhou (2011)
Gortler, S., Grzeszczuk, R., Szeliski, R., Cohen, M.F.: The Lumigraph. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 43–54. ACM Press, New York (1996)
Bezdek, J.C., Coray, C., Gunderson, R., Watson, J.: Detection and Characterization of Cluster Substructure I. Linear Structure: Fuzzy c-lines. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 40(2), 339–357 (1981)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhu, C., Yu, L., Zhou, P. (2014). Coverage Field Analysis to the Quality of Light Field Rendering. In: Gurrin, C., Hopfgartner, F., Hurst, W., Johansen, H., Lee, H., O’Connor, N. (eds) MultiMedia Modeling. MMM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04117-9_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04117-9_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04116-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04117-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)