Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On Soil Carbon Monitoring Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Soil Carbon

Part of the book series: Progress in Soil Science ((PROSOIL))

Abstract

The design of a Soil Monitoring Network (SMN) poses numerous scientific challenges, especially for the assessment of national or continental areas. The task is particularly challenging because soil carbon content and stocks are driven by controlling factors of disparate origins and scales. Various approaches to the establishment of SMNs are reviewed here. Frameworks for soil monitoring exist in numerous countries, especially in Europe. Although some countries work using standard monitoring methodologies and coverage, there is considerable variation in approaches to the monitoring of soil carbon even within a country. In addition to achieving harmonization, there are generic issues which must be addressed when SMNs are established and operated: the SMN should be effective for different soils, and it must enable the detection of change in soil carbon at relevant spatial and temporal scales with adequate precision and statistical power. We present examples which address these issues and summarize previous reviews on this topic. It is essential to establish an adequate sampling protocol which can be applied at each sampling location and time. The design must address the questions that the user of data has and provide information with accuracy and precision at the spatial and temporal scales that match the users’ needs. Furthermore, the design must match the methods of analysis so that statistical assumptions can be justified. At the global scale, the question of harmonizing sampling and analytical methods is difficult. Here, we propose the establishment of benchmark sites devoted to harmonization and inter-calibration. We present a case study from France which addresses scientific issues such as how many calibration sites are necessary and how they should be selected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arrouays D, PĂ©lissier P (1994a) Modeling carbon storage profiles in temperate forest humic loamy soils of France. Soil Sci 157:185–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arrouays D, PĂ©lissier P (1994b) Changes in carbon storage in temperate humic loamy soils after forest clearing and continuous corn cropping in France. Plant Soil 160:215–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Arrouays D, Marchant BP, Saby NPA, Meersmans J, Orton TG, Martin MP, Bellamy PH, Lark RM, Kibblewhite M (2012) Generic issues on broad scale soil monitoring schemes: a review. Pedosphere 22(4):456–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy PH, Loveland PJ, Bradley RI, Lark RM, Kirk GJD (2005) Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978–2003. Nature 437:245–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernoux M, Arrouays D, Cerri C, Bourennane H (1998) Modeling vertical distribution of carbon in Oxisols of the Western Brazilian Amazon (RondĂ´nia). Soil Sci 163:941–951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brus D, de Gruijter J (1997) Random sampling or geostatistical modeling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion). Geoderma 60:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conen F, Yakutin M, Sambuu A (2003) Potential for detecting changes in soil organic carbon concentrations resulting from climate change. Glob Chang Biol 9:1515–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conen F, Zerva A, Arrouays D, Jolivet C, Jarvis P, Grace J, Mencuccini M (2004) The carbon balance of forest soils; detectability of changes in soil carbon stocks in temperate and boreal forests. In: Jarvis P, Griffith H (eds) The carbon balance of forest biomes. Bios Scientific Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Gruijter JJ, Brus DJ, Bierkens M, Knotters M (2006) Sampling for natural resource monitoring. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Desaules A, Ammann S, Schwab P (2010) Advances in long-term soil-pollution monitoring of Switzerland. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 173:525–535

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC et al (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlingstein P, Cox P, Betts R, Bopp L, von Bloh W, Brovkin V, Cadule P, Doney S, Eby M, Fung I, Bala G, John J, Jones C, Joos F, Kato T, Kawamiya M, Knorr W, Lindsay K, Matthews HD, Raddatz T, Rayner P, Reick C, Roeckner E, Schnitzler KG, Schnur R, Strassmann K, Weaver AJ, Yoshikawa C, Zeng N (2006) Climate–carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J Clim 30(19):3337–3353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goidts E, van Wesemael B, Van Oost K (2009a) Driving forces of soil organic carbon evolution at the landscape and regional scale using data from a stratified soil monitoring. Glob Chang Biol 15:2981–3000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goidts E, Wesemael B, Crucifix M (2009b) Magnitude and sources of uncertainties in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock assessments at various scales. Eur J Soil Sci 60:723–739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jolivet C, Arrouays D, Bernoux M (1998) Comparison between analytical methods for organic carbon and organic matter determination in sandy spodosols of France. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 29:2227–2233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kibblewhite MG, Jones R, Montanarella L, Baritz R, Huber S, Arrouays D, Micheli E, Stephens M (2008) Environmental assessment of soil for monitoring, vol VI. Soil monitoring system for Europe. Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, EUR 23490 EN/6

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk GJD, Bellamy PB (2010) Analysis of changes in organic carbon in mineral soils across England and Wales using a simple single-pool model. Eur J Soil Sci 61:401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lark RM (2009) Estimating the regional mean status and change of soil properties: two distinct objectives for soil survey. Eur J Soil Sci 60:748–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lark RM, Bellamy PH, Kirk GJD (2006a) Baseline values and change in the soil, and implications for monitoring. Eur J Soil Sci 57:916–921

    Google Scholar 

  • Lark RM, Cullis BR, Welham SJ (2006b) On spatial prediction of soil properties in the presence of a spatial trend: the empirical best linear unbiased predictor (E-BLUP) with REML. Eur J Soil Sci 57:787–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis BP, Saby NPA, Orton TG, Lacarce E, Boulonne L, Jolivet CC, RatiĂ© C, Arrouays D (2014) Statistical sampling design impact on predictive quality of harmonization functions between soil monitoring networks. Geoderma 213:133–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant BP, Newman S, Corstanje R, Reddy KR, Ozborne TZ, Lark RM (2009) Spatial monitoring of a non-stationary soil property: phosphorus in a Florida water conservation area. Eur J Soil Sci 60:757–769

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchant BP, Saby NPA, Lark RM, Bellamy PH, Jolivet CC, Arrouays D (2010) Robust analysis of soil properties at the national scale: cadmium content of French soils. Eur J Soil Sci 61(1):144–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meersmans J, Van Wesemael B, De Ridder F, Dotti MF, De Baets S, Van Molle M (2009) Changes in organic carbon distribution with depth in agricultural soils in northern Belgium, 1960–2006. Glob Chang Biol 15:2739–2750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meersmans J, van Wesemael B, Goidts E, van Molle M, De Baets S, De Ridder F (2011) Spatial analysis of soil organic carbon evolution in Belgian croplands and grasslands, 1960–2006. Glob Chang Biol 17:466–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minasny B, McBratney AB, Hong SY, Sulaeman Y, Kim MS, Zhang YS, Kim YH, Han KH (2012) Continuous rice cropping has been sequestering carbon in soils in Java and South Korea for the past 30 years. Glob Biogeochem Cycl 26:GB3027. doi:10.1029/2012GB004406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morvan X, Saby NPA, Arrouays D, Le Bas C, Jones RJA, Verheijen FGA, Bellamy PH, Stephens M, Kibblewhite MG (2008) Soil monitoring in Europe: a review of existing systems and requirements for harmonisation. Sci Total Environ 391:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orton TG, Rawlins BG, Lark RM (2009) Using measurements close to a detection limit in a geostatistical case study to predict selenium concentration in topsoil. Geoderma 152(3–4):269–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orton T, Saby NPA, Arrouays D, Walter C, Lemercier B, Schvartz C, Lark RM (2012) Spatial prediction of soil organic carbon from data on large and variable spatial supports. ΙΙ. Mapping temporal change. Environmetrics 23:148–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan G, Xu X, Smith P, Pan W, Lal R (2010) An increase in topsoil SOC stock of China’s croplands between 1985 and 2006 revealed by soil monitoring. Agric Ecosyst Environ 136:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton W, Scurlock J, Ojima D, Gilmanov T, Scholes R, Schimel D, Kirchner T, Menaut J, Seastedt T, Moya E, Kamnalrut A, Kinyamario J (1993) Observations and modeling of biomass and soil organic-matter dynamics for the grassland biome worldwide. Global Biogeochem Cycl 7:785–809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson GA, Lyon DJ, Fenster CR (2012) Valuing long-term field experiments: quantifying the scientific contribution of a long-term tillage experiment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:757–765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reijneveld A, van Wensem J, Oenema O (2009) Soil organic carbon contents of agricultural land in the Netherlands between 1984 and 2004. Geoderma 152:231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds B, Chamberlain PM, Poskitt J, Woods C, Scott WA, Rowe EC, Robinson DA, Frogbrook ZL, Keith AM, Henrys PA, Black HIJ, Emmett BA (2013) Countryside survey: National “Soil Change” 1978–2007 for Topsoils in Great Britain—Acidity, Carbon, and Total Nitrogen Status. Vadose Zone J 12: vzj2012.0114. doi:10.2136/vzj2012.0114

  • Saby NPA, Bellamy PH, Morvan X, Arrouays D, Jones RJA, Verheijen FGA, Kibblewhite MG, Verdoodt A, Berenyiuveges J, Freudenschuss A, Simota C (2008a) Will European soil-monitoring networks be able to detect changes in topsoil organic carbon content? Glob Chang Biol 14:2432–2442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saby N, Arrouays D, Antoni V, Lemercier B, Follain S, Walter C, Schvartz C (2008b) Changes in soil organic carbon in a mountainous French region, 1990–2004. Soil Use Manag 24:254–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleutel S, De Neve S, Hofmas G (2007) Assessing causes of recent organic carbon losses from cropland soils by means of regional-scales input balances for the case of Flanders (Belgium). Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 78:265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P (2004) How long before a change in soil organic carbon can be detected? Glob Chang Biol 10:1878–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P et al (2007) Climate change cannot be entirely responsible for soil carbon loss observed in England and Wales, 1978–2003. Glob Chang Biol 13:2605–2609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wesemael B, Paustian K, Andren O, Cerri CEP, Dodd M, Etchevers J, Goidts E, Grace P, Katterer T, McConkey BG, Ogle S, Pan GX, Siebner C (2011) How can soil monitoring networks be used to improve predictions of organic carbon pool dynamics and CO2 fluxes in agricultural soils? Plant Soil 338:247–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler DM, Sparling GP, Roberts AHC (2004) Trends in some soil test data over a 14-year period in New Zealand. N Z J Agric Res 47:155–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. INRA, US 1106, InfoSol Unit, CS 40001, Ardon, Orleans Cedex 2, F-45075, France

    Dominique Arrouays, Nicolas P. A. Saby, Jeroen Meersmans, Claudy Jolivet, Thomas G. Orton, Manuel P. Martin & Benjamin P. Louis

  2. British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK

    Ben P. Marchant & Richard M. Lark

  3. Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL, UK

    Patricia H. Bellamy & M. Kibblewhite

  4. INRA, Biostatistique et Processus Spatiaux (BioSP), Domaine Saint Paul, Site Agroparc, CS 40509 – 84914, Avignon Cedex 9, France

    D. Allard

Authors
  1. Dominique Arrouays
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ben P. Marchant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicolas P. A. Saby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeroen Meersmans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Claudy Jolivet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas G. Orton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Manuel P. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Patricia H. Bellamy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Richard M. Lark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Benjamin P. Louis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. D. Allard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. M. Kibblewhite
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominique Arrouays .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Alfred E. Hartemink

  2. Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin – Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    Kevin McSweeney

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arrouays, D. et al. (2014). On Soil Carbon Monitoring Networks. In: Hartemink, A., McSweeney, K. (eds) Soil Carbon. Progress in Soil Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04084-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation