Advertisement

Soil Carbon pp 239-247 | Cite as

Soil Carbon Sequestration with Improved Soil Management in Three Tribal Villages in India

  • Ch. SrinivasaraoEmail author
  • B. Venkateswarlu
  • Y. Sudha Rani
  • A. K. Singh
  • S. Dixit
Chapter
Part of the Progress in Soil Science book series (PROSOIL)

Abstract

Under the National Initiative on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project implemented by Indian Government, various climate resilient farm technologies (soil, water, nutrient, crop, livestock, forestry etc.) are being evaluated in 100 climatically vulnerable districts. As a part of NICRA, carbon balance was studied with EX-ACT model for three villages in Nalgonda and Khammam districts of Andhra Pradesh. The EX-ACT model computed carbon balance of 5,289 and 3,285 tonnes CO2 equivalents (t CO2 e) in Nandyalagudem and Boringthanda villages and 12,861 t CO2 e in Nacharam village. Although farmers have awareness on C–positive practices, field implementation is meager due to lack of immediate income gains. Incentive based interventions might encourage field interventions which promote soil carbon sequestration and overall C balance in the system. Reduced tillage, crop residue recycling, water, nutrient and manure management and fodder and livestock interventions have been C positive practices followed in these villages which contributed positive C balance.

Keywords

Agriculture EX-ACT model Carbon balance Carbon sequestration Tribal villages Project interventions 

References

  1. Allmaras RR, Schomberg HH, Douglas CL, Dao TH (2000) Soil organic carbon sequestration potential of adopting conservation tillage in U.S. croplands. J Soil Water Conserv 55:365–373Google Scholar
  2. Bernoux M, Bockel L, Branca G, Tinlot M (2010) EX-Ante Carbon-balance Tool (EXACT) technical guidelines, version May 2010, EASYPol Module 101. FAO, Rome, 79 p. http://www.fao.org/docs/up/easypol/780/ex-act-tech-guidelines_101en.pdf
  3. Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R (2008) No-tillage and soil-profile carbon sequestration: an on-farm assessment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:693–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Branca G, Hissa H, Benez MC, Medeiros K, Lipper L, Tinlot M, Bockel L, Bernoux M (2013) Capturing synergies between rural development and agricultural mitigation in Brazil. Land Use Policy 30:507–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dersch G, Bohm K (2001) Effects of agronomic practices on the soil carbon storage potential in arable farming in Austria. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 60:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guangxi Xing, Xu Zhao, Zhengqin Xiong, Xiaoyuan Yan, Hua Xu, Yingxin Xie, Shulian Shi (2009) Nitrous oxide emission from paddy fields in China. Acta Ecol Sin 29:45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. IPCC (2006) In: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Nagara T, Tanake K (eds) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. IGES, JapanGoogle Scholar
  8. Jabro JD, Sainju U, Stevens WB, Evans RG (2008) Carbon dioxide flux as affected by tillage and irrigation in soil converted from perennial forages to annual crops. J Environ Manage 88:1478–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kindred D, Berry P, Burch O, Sylvester-Bradley R (2008) Effects of nitrogen fertilizer use on green house gas emissions and land use change. Aspect Appl Biol 88:1–4Google Scholar
  10. Majumdar D, Kumar S, Pathak H, Jain MC, Kumar U (2000) Reducing nitrous oxide emission from an irrigated rice field of North India with nitrification inhibitors. Agric Ecosyst Environ 81:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MoA (Ministry of Agriculture) (2012) Govt. of India, New Delhi. www.eands.dacnet.nic.in
  12. MoEF, IINC-UNFCCC (2004) India’s initial national communication to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. NATCOM Report, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi, p 267. http://www.natcomindia.org
  13. Pathak H, Singh R, Bhatia A, Jain N (2006) Recycling of rice straw to improve wheat yield and soil fertility and reduce atmospheric pollution. Paddy Water Environ 4:111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Srinivasarao C, Venkateswarlu B, Lal R, Singh AK, Vittal KPR, Kundu S, Singh SR, Singh SP (2012) Long-term effects of soil fertility management on carbon sequestration in rice–lentil cropping system of the Indo-Gangetic plains. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:168–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Srinivasarao Ch, Venkateswarlu B, Rattan L, Singh AK, Sumantha K (2013) Chapter Five-Sustainable management of soils of dryland ecosystems for enhancing agronomic productivity and sequestering carbon. In: Sparks DL (ed) Adv Agron 121:253–329Google Scholar
  16. van Vliet PCJ, van der Stelt B, Rietberg PI, de Goede RGM (2007) Effects of organic matter content on earthworms and nitrogen mineralization in grassland soils. Eur J Soil Biol 43:222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang J, Christopher SA (2003) Intercomparison between satellite derived aerosol optical thickness and PM2.5 mass: implications for air quality studies. Geophys Res Lett 30(21):2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wassmann R, Neue HU, Lantin RS, Makarim K, Chareonsilp N, Buendia LV, Rennenberg H (2000) Characterization of methane emissions from rice fields in Asia. II. Differences among irrigated, rainfed and deep water rice. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 58(1–3):13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ch. Srinivasarao
    • 1
    Email author
  • B. Venkateswarlu
    • 1
  • Y. Sudha Rani
    • 1
  • A. K. Singh
    • 2
  • S. Dixit
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Resource ManagementCentral Research Institute for Dryland AgricultureHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Indian Council of Agricultural ResearchNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations