Skip to main content

Harmonization of Regional Biosafety and Regulatory Services to Remove Future Trade Barriers in the COMESA Region

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Science Policy Reports ((SCIPOLICY,volume 7))

Abstract

The Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) is the largest regional trade bloc on the African continent, consisting of 19 member States, with a population size of about 400 million people. Agricultural products are an important part of trade in the COMESA region. There are several products that are of potential importance, as they are available globally as GM crops are/or being developed in some COMESA countries and Africa in general. Putting in place functional biosafety regulatory regimes is a prerequisite for the introduction and trans-boundary movements of GM crops. In most COMESA member States, the regulatory requirements for trade in GM-crop commodities are unclear. The COMESA Ministers of Agriculture have long realized the need for a regional approach, and launched the Regional Approach on Biotechnology and Biosafety policy in Eastern and Southern Africa (RABESA) Project in 2003. One of the major achievements of the RABESA project is the drafting in 2009 of the regional policy on cultivation, trade, and emergency food aid concerning GM crops. The process of policy formulation has undergone intensive consultations with key stakeholders in an inclusive, participatory, and interactive manner. The draft policy has gained support from the regulatory authorities and technical experts, and now awaits endorsement by the COMESA policy organs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The COMESA Policy on Biotechnology and Biosafety has been adopted by the 32nd Meeting of the Council of Ministers, 23–24 February 2014, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Abbreviations

ACTS:

African Centre for Technology Studies

AGOA:

African Growth and Opportunity Act

ASARECA:

Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa

AU:

African Union

AU/NEPAD:

African Union/New Partnership for Africa’s Development

BCH:

Biosafety Clearing-House

CAADP:

Comprehensive Africa Agricultural Development Program

COMESA:

Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa

CPB:

Cartagena Biosafety Protocol

EAC:

East African Community

FFP:

Feed, Food, or Processing

FTA:

Free trade area

GM:

Genetically modified

GMO:

Genetically modified organism

IFPRI/PBS:

International Food Policy Research Institute/ Program of Biosafety Systems

ISAAA:

International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications

LMO:

Living modified organism

LMO-FFP:

Living modified organisms as food or feed, or for processing

NTB:

Non-tariff barriers

PoE:

Panel of Biotechnology and Biosafety Experts

RABESA:

Regional Approach on Biotechnology and Biosafety policy in Eastern and Southern Africa

REC:

Regional Economic Community

SADC:

Southern African Development Community

SSA:

Sub-Saharan Africa

USAID:

United States Agency for International Development

WTO:

World Trade Organisation

References

  • ABS (2012) Africa biofortified sorghum. ABS project: technology development. http://biosorghum.org/home.php. Accessed 8 Oct 2012

  • COMESA (2012) About COMESA. http://about.comesa.int/. Accessed 8 Oct 2012

  • FAO (1988) Regional trends in production and utilization of sorghum and millets. http://www.fao.org/docrep/T0818E/T0818E00.htm#Contents. Accessed 8 Oct 2012

  • Gruere G (2006) An analysis of trade related regulations of genetically modified food and their effects on developing countries. EPT discussion paper 147. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe G (2006) A comparative analysis of the national biosafety regulatory systems in East Africa. EPTD discussion paper 146. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • James C (2012) Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2012. ISAAA, Ithaca. ISAAA brief no. 44

    Google Scholar 

  • Karim IEEA, Ismail IS (2007) Potential for agricultural trade in COMESA region: a comparative study of Sudan, Egypt and Kenya. Afr J Agric Res 2(10):481–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimani V, Gruère G (2010) Implications of import regulations and information requirements under the Cartagena Protocol on biosafety for GM commodities in Kenya. AgBioForum 13(3):222–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansour S (2011) Foreign Agricultural Service. Global Agricultural Information Network, 2011.Cotton Update. http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Cotton%20up-date_Cairo_Egypt_10-20-2011.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2012

  • Mwapachu JV (2009) State of the tripartite free trade area: progress (from the report of the chairperson of the Tripartite Task Force — Amb. Juma V. Mwapachu — Secretary General, EA). http://www.comesa-eac-sadctripartite.org/intervention/focal_areas/tripartite_fta. Accessed 13 Sept 2012

  • Paarlberg R, Wafula D, Minde D, Wakhungu J (2006a) Projected farm income gains in the COMESA/ASARECA region from commercialization of Bt maize. ACTS Press, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Paarlberg C, Wafula D, Minde D, Wakhungu J (2006b) Commercial export risks of genetically modified (GM) crops in the COMESA/ASARECA region. ACTS Press, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Paarlberg R, Wafula D, Minde D, Wakhungu J (2006c) Food aid import policies in the COMESA/ASARECA region: the costs and benefits of current policy options. ACTS Press, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Redick TP (2007) The Cartagena protocol on biosafety: precautionary priority in biotech crop approvals and containment of commodities shipments. Colo J Int Environ Law Policy 18:51–116

    Google Scholar 

  • UN COMTRADE (2012) Trade statistics for international business development. http://www.trademap.org/SelectionMenu.aspx. Accessed various dates, July–Oct 2012

Download references

Acknowledgements

The COMESA Biotechnology and Biosafety Program has been financially supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The partners that have supported COMESA in the implementation of the RABESA Project since inception include the Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in Eastern and Central Africa (ASARECA), the Program for Biosafety Systems [International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)/Program of Biosafety Systems PBS), the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA AfriCenter), and the African Centre for Technology Studies (ACTS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Getachew Belay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the above institutions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belay, G., Kimani, V., Wafula, D. (2014). Harmonization of Regional Biosafety and Regulatory Services to Remove Future Trade Barriers in the COMESA Region. In: Wambugu, F., Kamanga, D. (eds) Biotechnology in Africa. Science Policy Reports, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04001-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics