Skip to main content

Elements of an Enabling Biosafety and Regulatory Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biotechnology in Africa

Part of the book series: Science Policy Reports ((SCIPOLICY,volume 7))

Abstract

Regardless of whether countries use existing laws to regulate genetically modified organisms, or develop stand-alone biosafety Acts with regulations and guidelines, the existence of legislation alone does not ensure a workable or an enabling biosafety framework. Elements essential to implementing an enabling biosafety system include clear policy objectives, the political will to make decisions, coordinated inter-ministerial decision making, efficient and transparent decision making, and all the aspects needed to implement a functional biosafety framework. These include iterative consultation with applicants, science-based risk assessment, risk management that is commensurate with the identified level of risk, a cost-effective process, and fast-tracking procedures for activities known to have low risk. Functional regional biosafety processes could facilitate coordinated decision-making across many countries, which would increase the access farmers and end users have to better planting materials and other improved products of genetic modification. In addition to reviewing the key elements for an enabling biosafety and regulatory environment, this chapter reviews historical reasons for the high number of unworkable national biosafety frameworks in Africa, and provides links to useful resources for countries wishing to revise their biosafety systems in order to enable access to the benefits of biotechnology in Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

COMESA:

Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa

ECOWAS:

Economic Community Of West African States

GMO:

Genetically modified organism

UNEP/GEF:

United Nations Environment Programme/Global Environment Facility

References

  • African Union (2001) African model law on safety in biotechnology. http://www.africa-union.org/root/au/auc/departments/hrst/biosafety/AU_Biosafety_2b.htm. Accessed 1 Nov 2012

  • African Union (2011) Revised African model law on biosafety. http://www.au.int/en/dp/hrst/sites/default/files/2011-FinalDraftAMLS-en.pdf. Accessed 13 Nov 2012

  • Abramson SH, Van der Meer L (2002) Model biosafety Act. In: Biosafety regulation source book (2006) Arent Fox, Washington, DC. http://www.arentfox.com/modelbiosafetyact.pdf Accessed 1 Nov 2012

  • ICGEB (2011) Guidance for a fit-for-purpose regulatory framework for GMOs. Consensus document. International Centre for Genetic Experimentation and Biotechnology, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

  • James C (2012) Global status of biotech/GM crops: 2011, vol 43, ISAAA briefs. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimani V, Gruere G (2010) Implications of import regulations and information requirements under the Cartagena Protocol on biosafety for GM commodities in Kenya. AgBioForum 13(3):222–241

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean MA, Frederick RJ, Traynor PL, Cohen JI, Komen J (2002) A conceptual framework for implementing biosafety: linking policy, capacity and regulation, vol 47, ISNAR briefing paper. International Service for National Agricultural Research, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris EJ, Koch M (2002) Biosafety of genetically modified crops—an African perspective. AgBiotechNet 4:ABN 102

    Google Scholar 

  • Raybould A (2006) Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Environ Biosafety Res 5:119–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traynor P, Frederick R, Koch M (2002) Biosafety in agricultural biotechnology. A workbook for training in biosafety risk assessment. Agricultural Biotechnology Support Project (ABSP), Michigan

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muffy Koch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koch, M. (2014). Elements of an Enabling Biosafety and Regulatory Environment. In: Wambugu, F., Kamanga, D. (eds) Biotechnology in Africa. Science Policy Reports, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04001-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics