Advertisement

Online Conversation: Information Literacy as Discourse between Peers

  • Geoff Walton
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 397)

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to outline a fresh approach which seeks to harness students’ predilection for communication by exploiting its value as a learning tool to teach information literacy (IL). This approach was used in the first-year undergraduate core module Research and Professional Development. Inquiry-based learning, IL (particularly information discernment) and online peer assessment were used to create active online learning opportunities where students learnt by doing: they read, reviewed, reflected on and commented on other’s work (a draft essay) via a Virtual Learning Environment. These online conversations were informed by face-to-face workshops on research skills, critical thinking, plagiarism and referencing and the Assignment Survival Kit (ASK) www.staffs.ac.uk/ask . This approach not only produced a noticeable change in student achievement, but brought together e-learning and IL to deliver a range of IL learning outcomes including information discernment.

Keywords

IL online discourse information behaviour e-learning online peer assessment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Laurillard, D.: Rethinking University Teaching, 2nd edn. Routledge, London (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Osborne, J.: Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Science 328(5977), 463–466 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leach, L., Neutze, G., Zepke, N.: Assessment and Empowerment: Some Critical Questions. Assessment and Education in Higher Education 26, 293–305 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moon, J.A.: Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice. Routledge Falmer, Abingdon (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Race, P.: The Lecturer’s Tool Kit: a Resource for Developing Learning, Teaching and Assessment, 2nd edn. Kogan Page, London (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mayes, T., de Freitas, S.: JISC E-learning Models Desk Study: Stage 2: Review of E-learning Theories. Frameworks and Models (1) (2004), http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Stage%202%20Learning%20Models%20Version%201.pdf
  7. 7.
    Chan, C.K.K., van Alast, J.: Collaborative Inquiry and Knowledge Building in Networked Multimedia Environments. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G. (eds.) International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, pp. 229–316. Springer, Dordrecht (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walton, G., Barker, J., Hepworth, M., Stephens, D.: Facilitating Information Literacy Teaching and Learning in a Level 1 Sport and Exercise Module by Means of Collaborative Online and Reflective Learning. In: Andretta, S. (ed.) Change and Challenge: Information Literacy for the 21st Century. Auslib Press, Adelaide (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walton, G., Barker, J., Hepworth, M., Stephens, D.: Using Online Collaborative Learning to Enhance Information Literacy Delivery in a Level 1 Module: an Evaluation. Journal of Information Literacy 1(1), 13–30 (2007), http://jil.lboro.ac.uk/ojs/index.php/JIL/article/view/RA-V1-I1-2007-2/3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pope, A., Walton, G.: Information and Media Literacies: Sharpening our Vision in the Twenty First Century. In: Leaning, M. (ed.) Issues in Information and Media Literacy: Education, Practice and Pedagogy, pp. 1–29. Informing Science Press, California (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hepworth, M., Walton, G.: Teaching Information Literacy for Inquiry-Based Learning. Chandos, Oxford (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lloyd, A., Kennan, M., Thompson, K., Qayyum, A.: Connecting with New Information Landscapes: Information Practices of Refugees. Journal of Documentation 69(1), 121–144 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walton, G., Cleland, J.: Strand 2: Becoming an Independent Learner. In: Secker, J., Coonan, E. (eds.) Rethinking Information Literacy: A Practical Framework for Teaching. Facet, London (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Walton, G., Hepworth, M.: Using Assignment Data to Analyse a Blended Information Literacy Intervention: A Quantitative Approach. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 45(1), 53–63 (2013), http://lis.sagepub.com/content/45/1/53.full.pdf+html CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gratton, C., Jones, I.: Research Methods for Sports Studies, 2nd edn. Routledge, London (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilkinson, S.: Focus Groups. In: Smith, J.A. (ed.) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, pp. 184–204. Sage, London (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miles, M.B., Huberman, M.A.: Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1984)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoff Walton
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and EnvironmentNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations