Advertisement

Feeling Something without Knowing Why: Measuring Emotions toward Archetypal Content

  • Huang-Ming Chang
  • Leonid Ivonin
  • Wei Chen
  • Matthias Rauterberg
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 124)

Abstract

To enhance communication among users through technology, we propose a framework that communicates ‘pure experience.’ This framework can be achieved by providing emotionally charged communication. To initiate this undertaking, we propose to explore materials for communicating human emotions. Research on emotion mainly focuses on emotions that are relevant to utilitarian concerns. Besides the commonly-known emotions like joy and fear, there are non-utilitarian emotions, such as aesthetic emotions, which are essential to our daily lives. Based on Jung’s theory of collective unconsciousness, we consider archetypal content as a new category of affective stimuli of non-utilitarian emotions. We collected pictures and sounds of the archetype of the self, and conducted an experiment with existing affective stimuli of utilitarian emotions. The results showed that archetypal content is potential to be a new category of affective content. It is promising to explore other affective content for further studies.

Keywords

affective computing non-utilitarian emotion archetypal content 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Scheirer, J., Picard, R.W.: Affective Objects. MIT Media Laboratory Perceptual Computing Section Technical Report No. 524 (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang, H.-M., Ivonin, L., Chen, W., Rauterberg, M.: Lifelogging for hidden minds: Interacting unconsciously. In: Anacleto, J.C., Fels, S., Graham, N., Kapralos, B., Saif El-Nasr, M., Stanley, K. (eds.) ICEC 2011. LNCS, vol. 6972, pp. 411–414. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rottenberg, J., Ray, R.D., Gross, J.J.: Emotion elicitation using films. In: Coan, J.A., Allen, J.J.B. (eds.) Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment, pp. 9–28. Oxford University Press, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scherer, K.R.: What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information 44, 695–729 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bargh, J.A., Morsella, E.: The unconscious mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3, 73–79 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jung, C.G.: The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1981)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gross, J.J., Levenson, R.W.: Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition and Emotion 9, 87–108 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., Cuthbert, B.N.: International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. pp. 1–12. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: The international affective digitized sounds (IADS-2): Affective ratings of sounds and instruction manual. Technical Report B-3. pp. 29–46. Oxford University Press, USA, Gainesville, FL (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jung, C.G.: Man and His Symbols. Doubleday, Garden City (1964)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gronning, T., Sohl, P., Singer, T.: ARAS: Archetypal Symbolism and Images. Visual Resources 23, 245–267 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, S., Kang, H.S., Kim, Y.H.: A computer system for art therapy assessment of elements in structured mandala. The Arts in Psychotherapy 36, 19–28 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schrade, C., Tronsky, L., Kaiser, D.H.: Physiological effects of mandala making in adults with intellectual disability. The Arts in Psychotherapy 38, 109–113 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elkis-Abuhoff, D., Gaydos, M., Goldblatt, R., Chen, M., Rose, S.: Mandala drawings as an assessment tool for women with breast cancer. The Arts in Psychotherapy 36, 231–238 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wikipedia: Rose window - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rose_window&oldid=510855813
  16. 16.
    Wikipedia contributors: Om, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Om
  17. 17.
    Wikipedia contributors: Solfeggio frequencies, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solfeggio_frequencies
  18. 18.
    Maheshwarananda, P.S.S.: The hidden power in humans: Chakras and Kundalin. Ibera Verlag (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ribeiro, R.L., Teixeira-Silva, F., Pompéia, S., Bueno, O.F.A.: IAPS includes photographs that elicit low-arousal physiological responses in healthy volunteers. Physiology & Behavior 91, 671–675 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 25, 49–59 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bhavacakra - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel_of_Existence
  22. 22.
    Welch, D.: mountainmystic9’s Channel, http://www.youtube.com/user/mountainmystic9
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Damasio, A.R.: The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: Some questions and answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9, 159–162 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huang-Ming Chang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Leonid Ivonin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wei Chen
    • 2
  • Matthias Rauterberg
    • 2
  1. 1.CETpD Research CenterUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaSpain
  2. 2.Dept. Industrial DesignEindhoven University of TechnologyNetherlands

Personalised recommendations