Skip to main content

Some Thoughts on the Ontogenesis in B-Cell Immune Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Managing Complexity, Reducing Perplexity

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 67))

  • 722 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we focus on the antigen-independent maturation of B-cells and, via statistical mechanics tools, we study the emergence of self/non-self discrimination by mature B lymphocytes. We consider only B lymphocytes: despite this is an oversimplification, it may help to highlight the role of B-B interactions otherwise shadowed by other mechanisms due to helper T-cell signalling. Within a framework for B-cell interactions recently introduced, we impose that, during ontogenesis, those lymphocytes, which strongly react with a previously stored set of antigens assumed as “self”, are killed. Hence, via numerical simulations we find that the resulting system of mature lymphocytes, i.e. those which have survived, shows anergy with respect to self-antigens, even in its mature life, that it to say, the learning process at ontogenesis develops a stable memory in the network. Moreover, when self-antigen are not assumed as purely random objects, which is a too strong simplification, but rather they are extracted from a biased probability distribution, mature lymphocytes displaying a higher weighted connectivity are also more affine with the set of self-antigens, ultimately conferring strong numerical evidence to the first postulate of autopoietic theories (e.g. Varela and Counthino approaches), according to which the most connected nodes in the idiotypic network are those self-directed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We only stress here that there exist strong differences between B-cell maturation in the bone marrow and T-cell maturation in the thymus [7, 12, 13]. Unlike TCR (T cell receptor), that evolved to recognize characteristic patterns of pathogens, BCR (B cell receptor) is primarily diversified in random fashion and has not evolved to recognize a particular structure. Therefore each B cell can not discriminate self versus non self alone [9].

  2. 2.

    Strictly speaking, negative selection requires that newborn lymphocytes also display a non-null binding strength with at least a self-antigen, probably to avoid antibodies completely cut off from the host [10].

  3. 3.

    The string length is assumed to be the same for any antibody following the fact that the molecular weight for any immunoglobulin is accurately close to \(15\times 10^4\) [5].

References

  1. A.K. Abbas, A.H. Lichtman, J.S. Pober, Cellular and Molecular Immunology (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Barra, E. Agliari, J. Stat. Mech. P07004 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Barra, E. Agliari, Physica A 389, 24 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Di Biasio, E. Agliari, A. Barra, R. Burioni, Theoret. Chem. Acc. in press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. W.J. Dreyer, J.C. Bennett, Nobel Prize Lecture (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Franz, G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2486 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R.A. Goldsby, T.J. Kindt, B.A. Osborne, Kuby: Immunology (UTET Press, New York, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. C.C. Goodnow et al., Nature 334, 676–682 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Kitamura, How the Immune System Recognizes Self and Nonself (Springer, Shinano, 2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Kosmrlj et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 068103 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. I. Lundkvist, A. Coutinho, F. Varela, D. Holmberg, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 86(13), 5074–5078, (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Mehr, A. Globerson, A.S. Perelson, J. Theor. Biol. 175, 103–126 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S.J. Merrill, R.J. De Boer, A.S. Perelson, Rocky Mountain J. Math. 24, 213–231 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Mezard, G. Parisi, M.A. Virasoro, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (World Scientific, Singapore, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.A. Nemazee, K. Burki, Nature 337, 562 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A.S. Perelson, Theoretical Immunology (Addison-Wiley Publ, Santa Fe Institute, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Rabello, A.C.C. Coolen, C.J. Pérez-Vicente, F. Fraternali, J. Phys. A 41, 285004 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Stewart, F.J. Varela, A. Coutinho, J. Autoimmun. 2, 1523 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  19. C.J. Thompson, Mathematical Statistical Mechanics (MacMillan Company, New York, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  20. F.J. Varela, A. Countinho, Immun. Today 12(5), 159 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wardemann et al., Science 301, 1374–1377 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriano Barra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Agliari, E., Barra, A., Franz, S., Pentado-Sabetta, T. (2014). Some Thoughts on the Ontogenesis in B-Cell Immune Networks. In: Delitala, M., Ajmone Marsan, G. (eds) Managing Complexity, Reducing Perplexity. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 67. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03759-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics