Optimal Build-or-Buy Decision for Component Selection of Application Package Software

  • P. C. Jha
  • Ramandeep Kaur
  • Shivani Bali
  • Sushila Madan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8298)


Application Package Software (APS) is a collection of software programs developed for the purpose of being licensed to third-party organizations. Examples of APS include accounting systems, human resources software, and enterprise resource planning (ERP) software. With the advancement in Information technology, Component Based Software Engineering (CBSE) has emerged for rapid assembly of flexible modular software systems. It promotes software re-use for large software systems by purchasing components in the form of commercial-off the shelf components from the vendor. If the required component is not available in the market, then it has to be developed in-house. This decision of whether to buy the component or build from the scratch is known as build-or-buy decision. Through this paper, we shall discuss a framework that will help the developer to decide whether to buy or to build software components while designing a fault-tolerant modular software system. This paper proposes optimization models for optimal component selection for a fault-tolerant modular software system under the Recovery Block Scheme (RBS).


Application Package Software (APS) Commercial-off-the Shelf (COTS) Build-or-Buy Recovery Block Scheme (RBS) 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Onut, S., Efendigil, T.: A theoretical model design for ERP software selection process under the constraints of cost and quality: A fuzzy approach. Journal of Intelligence & Fuzzy Systems 21, 365–378 (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cortellessa, V., Marinelli, F., Potena, P.: An optimization framework for “build-or-buy” decisions in software architecture. Computers and Operations Research, Elsevier Science, 35-10, 3090–3106 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Jung, H.W., Choi, B.: Optimization models for quality and cost of modular software system. European Journal of Operations Research 112, 613–619 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jung, H.W.: Optimizing value and cost in requirement analysis. IEEE Software, 74–78 (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jadhav, A.S., Sonar, R.M.: Framework for evaluation and selection of the software packages: A hybrid knowledge based system approach. The Journal of Systems and Software 84, 1394–1407 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laprie, J.-C., Arlat, J., Beounes, C., Kanoun, K.: Definition and analysis of hardware- and software-fault-tolerant architectures. Computer, 39-51 (1990)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scott, R.K., Gault, J.W., McAllister, D.F., Wiggs, J.: Experimental validation of six fault-tolerant software reliability models. IEEE Fault Tolerant Comput. Syst. 14, 102–107 (1984)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scott, R.K., Gault, J.W., McAllister, D.F.: The consensus recovery block. In: Proc. Total Systems Reliability Symp., pp. 74–85 (1983)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scott, R.K., Gault, J.W., McAllister, D.F.: Modeling fault tolerant software reliability. In: Proc. Third Symp. Reliability in Distributed Software and Database Systems, pp. 15–27 (1983)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scott, R.K., Gault, J.W., McAllister, D.F.: Faulttolerant software reliability modeling. IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng. 13(5), 582–592 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tang, J.F., Mu, L.F., Kwong, C.K., Luo, X.G.: An optimization model for software component selection under multiple applications development. European Journal of Operational Research 212, 301–311 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bellman, R.E., Zadeh, L.A.: Decision making in a fuzzy environment. Manag. Sci. 17, 141–164 (1970)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schrage, L.: Optimization Modeling with LINDO. Duxbury Press, CA (1997)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. C. Jha
    • 1
  • Ramandeep Kaur
    • 2
  • Shivani Bali
    • 3
  • Sushila Madan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Institute of Information Technology & ManagementIndia
  3. 3.Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute of ManagementIndia

Personalised recommendations