Skip to main content

Knowledge Is Human

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Knowledge Management

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 4659 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter underlines the significance of people as the knowledge resource of an organisation. The reader learns about new forms of labour relations and knowledge worker productivity. Five groups of actors of the knowledge firm are introduced and particular emphasis is placed on competence development and motivation of knowledge workers. Communities of Practice (CoP) are discussed as an effective format for situated and social learning (For a detailed treatment of the topic we recommend the textbook “Effective knowledge work” by North and Gueldenberg 2011).

The most valuable assets of a 20th-century company were its production equipment. The most valuable asset of a 21st-century institution, whether business or non-business, will be its knowledge workers and their productivity – Peter Drucker (1999, p. 135)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficiency_wages

  2. 2.

    www.mindtree.com.

  3. 3.

    CSC Ploenzke information brochure

  4. 4.

    An overview of work motivation research can be found at Latham and Pinder (2005), an overview over motivation theories can be found under http://www.goldsmithibs.com/resources/free/motivation/notes/summary%20-%20motivation.pdf.

  5. 5.

    Ash, Jerry, ‘Ideas Emerging’, Case Report on Mindtree

References

  • Alter A (2005) Knowledge workers need better management. http://www.cioinsight.com/c/a/Expert-Voices/Knowledge-Workers-Need-Better-Management/

  • APQC (2013) Gamification in knowledge management – an APQC overview. http://www.apqc.org/knowledge-base/documents/gamification-knowledge-management-apqc-overview

  • Blair J (1997) Knowledge management leverages engineering at Chrysler: Gardner Group. Research note case studies CS-CS-219

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Gray ES (1999) The people are the company. http://www.fastcompany.com/online/01/people.html

  • Buckingham M, Coffman C (1999) First, break all the rules: what the world’s greatest managers do differently. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (2005) Thinking for a living: how to get better performance and results from knowledge worker. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Dostal W, Parmentier K, Plicht H, Rauch A, Schreyer F (2001) Wandel der Erwerbsarbeit. Qualifikationsverwertung in sich verändernden Arbeitsstrukturen, vol 246, Beiträge zur Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. Bundesanstalt für Arbeit, Nürnberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Draganidis F, Mentzas G (2006) Competency based management: a review of systems and approaches. Info Manag Comput Secur 14(1):51–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker PF (1999) Management challenges for the 21st century. Harper Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Escher FU, Bajenaru C (1997) Knowledge management? The real purpose is increased organizational capability. The means is knowledge-based work design. Knowl Manag 1(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class. Basic Books, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Galvin R (1996) Managing knowledge towards wisdom. Eur Manag J 14(4):374–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halal WE (1994) From hierarchy to enterprise: internal markets are the new foundation of management. Acad Manag Exec 8(4):69–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund G (1994) A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strateg Manag J 15:73–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hube G (2005) Beitrag zur Beschreibung und Analyse von Wissensarbeit. Dissertation am Institut für Arbeitswissenschaft und Technologiemanagement (IAT), Universität Stuttgart. Jost-Jetter Verlag, Heimsheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Janjua FJ, Naeem MA, Kayani FN (2012) The competence classification framework – a classification model for employee development. Interdiscip J Contemp Res Bus 4(1):396–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter RM (1989) The new managerial work. Harv Bus Rev 67:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlenzig W (1999) Chrysler’s new know mobiles. http://kmmag.com/kmmagn2/km199905/feature1.htm

  • Kim WC, Mauborgne R (2003) Fair process: managing in the knowledge economy. Harv Bus Rev, Jan 2003, pp 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Klodt H et al (1997) Tertiarisierung in der deutschen Wirtschaft. Institut für Weltwirtschaft an der Universität Kiel, Kiel

    Google Scholar 

  • La Barre P (1996) Knowledge brokers. Industry Week, 1 April 1996, p 50

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham GP, Pinder CC (2005) Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annu Rev Psychol 56:485–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maister DH (1993) Managing the professional service firm. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer C (1997) Relentless growth. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge creating company. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • North K, Gueldenberg S (2011) Effective knowledge work. Emerald, London

    Google Scholar 

  • North K, Franz M, Lembke G (2004) Wissenserzeugung und –austausch in Wissensgemeinschaften, vol 85, QUEM-Report Heft. Arbeitsgemeinschaft Betriebliche Weiterbildungsforschung, Projekt Qualifizierungs-Entwicklungs-Management, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer D, LuncefordS, Patton AJ (2012) The engagement economy: how gamification is reshaping businesses. Deloitte University Press, July 1, http://www.dupress.com/articles/the-engagement-economy-how-gamification-is-reshaping-

  • Perlow LA, Porter JL (2009) Making time-off predictable & required. Harv Bus Rev 87(10):102–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink D (2009) Drive: the surprising truth about what motivates. Riverhead, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst G, Borzillo S (2008) Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. Eur Manag J 26:335–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JB (1992) Intelligent enterprise. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JB et al (1996) Leveraging intellect. Acad Manag Exec 10(3):7–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum D (2012) The games businesses play. CFO.com 14 Feb. http://www3.cfo.com/article/2012/2/it-value_gamification-marketing-knowledge-management-?currpage=1

  • Saxenian A (1996) Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and route 128. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby KE (1997) The new organizational wealth. Berret-Koehler, San Francisco, http://www.sveiby.com.au

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson KR et al (1997) Stretch targets: what makes them effective? Acad Manag Exec 11(3):48–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998a) Communities of practice – learning as a social system. Published by System Thinker, 6/98

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (1998b) Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder W (2002) Cultivating communities of practice. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

North, K., Kumta, G. (2014). Knowledge Is Human. In: Knowledge Management. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03698-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics