Abstract
In the ADDIE model, evaluation is an ongoing process. Evaluation ensures that the all components of design are addressing the gap or need, while providing for continuous improvement. Evaluating a community of practice requires a systematic plan that is specific to the community being evaluated. Evaluation must occur through all phases of community design from conception through implementation and continuously through maintenance (Schwier et al., Instructional designers’ perceptions of their agency: Tales of change and community, In M. Keppell (Ed.), Instructional design: Case studies in communities of practice (pp. 1–18), Information Science Publishing, Hershey, PA, 2007). Designed communities often fail because they are not valued as contributors to the knowledge of the organization but rather as social gatherings or groups (Wenger, 2010). This chapter will explore how a community of practice for teaching faculty might be evaluated in the areas of domain, community, and practice.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alem, L., & Kravis, S. (2005). Design and evaluation of an online learning community: A case study at CSIRO. SIGGROUP Bulletin, 25(1), 20–24. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1067699.1067703
Derry, S. J., & DuRussel, L. A. (1999, July). Assessing knowledge construction in online learning communities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Artificial Intelligence in Education, Lemans, France (ERIC Document Reproduction No. Ed 446897).
Dubé, L., Bourhis, A., & Jacob, R. (2006). Towards a typology of virtual communities of practice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management, 1(1), 69–93.
Ke, F., & Hoadley, C. (2009). Evaluating online learning communities. Educational Technology Research & Development, 57(4), 487–510.
Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Probst, G., & Borzillo, S. (2008). Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal, 26(5), 335–347. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2008.05.003.
Schroeder, C. M. (2011). Coming in from the margin: Faculty development’s emerging organizational development role in institutional change. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Schwier, R. A., Campbell, K., & Kenny, R. F. (2007). Instructional designers’ perceptions of their agency: Tales of change and community. In M. Keppell (Ed.), Instructional design: Case studies in communities of practice (pp. 1–18). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing. doi:10.4018/978-1-59904322-7.ch001.
Teo, H.-H., Chan, H.-C., Wei, K.-K., & Zhang, Z. (2003). Evaluating information accessibility and community adaptivity features for sustaining virtual learning communities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(5), 671–697. doi:10.1016/S10715819(03)00087-9.
Verburg, R. M., & Andriessen, J. H. (2006). The assessment of communities of practice. Knowledge and Process Management, 13(1), 13–25. doi:10.1002/kpm.2413.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice a guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Wenger, E., Trayner, B., & de Laat, M. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: A conceptual framework. The Netherlands: Ruud de Moor Centrum of The Open University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bond, M.A., Lockee, B.B. (2014). Evaluation. In: Building Virtual Communities of Practice for Distance Educators. SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03626-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03626-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03625-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03626-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)