Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology ((BRIEFSECT))

  • 1132 Accesses

Abstract

The development phase the ADDIE model is the phase in which interventions are authored and produced (Richey et al., The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice, Routledge, New York, NY, 2011). Common tasks in the development phase include designing interactions, creating instructional materials, and building required mechanisms and processes. This chapter will explore the unique development strategies for building a virtual community of practice for faculty teaching at a distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2002). Virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice at caterpillar: Success factors and barriers. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(3), 94–113. doi:10.1111/j.19378327.2002.tb00258.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borzillo, S., Aznar, S., & Schmitt, A. (2011). A journey through communities of practice: How and why members move from the periphery to the core. European Management Journal, 29(1), 25–42. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2010.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J., Choo, C., Dunlap, D., Isenhour, P., Kerr, S., MacLean, A., et al. (2003). Knowledge management support for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(4), 42–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallah, N. (2011). Distributed form of leadership in communities of practice (CoPs). International Journal of Emerging Sciences, 1(3), 357–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gongla, P., & Rizzuto, C. R. (2004). Where did that community go? Communities of practice that disappear. In P. Hildreth & C. Kimble (Eds.), Knowledge networks: Innovation through communities of practice (pp. 295–307). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, P. H. (2001). The impact of knowledge repositories on power and control in the workplace. Information Technology & People, 14(4), 368–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2004). Informal learning in an online community of practice. Journal of Distance Education, 19(1), 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildreth, P., Kimble, C., & Wright, P. (2000). Communities of practice in the distributed international environment. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(1), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiziltepe, Z. (2008). Motivation and demotivation of university teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 14(5–6), 515–530. doi:10.1080/13540600802571361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindkvist, L. (2005). Knowledge communities and knowledge collectivities: A typology of knowledge work in groups. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1189–1210. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00538.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, C. (2001). Inclusivity and alignment: Principles of pedagogy, task and assessment design for effective cross-cultural online learning. Distance Education, 22(1), 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L. H., & Evans, I. M. (2003). Motivating the professoriate: Why sticks and carrots are only for donkeys. Higher Education Management and Policy, 15, 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probst, G., & Borzillo, S. (2008). Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal, 26(5), 335–347. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2008.05.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R., & Skinner, B. F. (1956). Some issues concerning the control of human behavior. Science, 124(3231), 1057–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharratt, M., & Usoro, A. (2003). Understanding knowledge-sharing in online communities of practice. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(2), 187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1967). Science and human behavior. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C.-C., & Lai, C.-Y. (2006). Knowledge contribution in the online virtual community: Capability and motivation. In J. Lang, F. Lin, & J. Wang (Eds.), Knowledge science, engineering and management, lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 4092, pp. 442–453). Berlin, Germany: Springer. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11811220_37

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice a guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bond, M.A., Lockee, B.B. (2014). Develop. In: Building Virtual Communities of Practice for Distance Educators. SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03626-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics