Abstract
In this paper, we introduce a new framework for registering pre-operative 3D volumetric data to intra-operative 2D images. We are particularly interested in examining the problem of aligning CT volumes to corresponding X-ray images. Our objective is to apply the 2D-3D registration in the field of orthopedics, specifically on ankle fusion surgery. Our framework adopts the shear-warp factorization (SWF) method to generate synthetic 2D images from the given 3D volume. Also, the alignment score is determined based on two novel similarity measures; the exponential correlation (EC) and the pixel-based individual entropy correlation coefficient (IECC). Our framework has been tested on 22 clinical CT datasets. We used different methods to evaluate registration quality of our system. Evaluation results confirm the degree of accuracy and robustness of our proposed framework.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
All algorithms are run on a PC with a 2 GHz Core i7 Quad processor with 8GB RAM.
References
Bifulco P, Cesarelli M, Allen R, Romano M, Fratini A, Pasquariello G (2010) 2D–3D Registration of CT vertebra volume to fluoroscopy projection: a calibration model assessment. EURASIP J Adv Sign Proces 1–8
Penney GP, Weese J, Little JA, Desmedt P, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ (1998) A comparison of similarity measures for use in 2D–3D medical image registration. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17(4):586–595
Markelj P, Tomazevic D, Likar B, Pernus F (2010) A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions. Med Image Anal 16(3):642–661
Zollei L (2001) 2D-3D rigid-body registration of x-ray fluoroscopy and CT images. Master Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
Weese J, Buzug TM, Lorenz C, Fassnacht C (1997) An approach to 2D/3D registration of a vertebra in 2D x-ray fluoroscopies with 3D, CVRMed/MRCAS’97, France, 19–22 March 1997
Viola P, Wells W (1997) Alignment by maximization of mutual information. Int J Comput Vision 24(2):137–154
Pluim PW, Maintz JBA, Viergever MA (2000) Image registration by maximization of combined mutual information and gradient information, Proc MICCAI 1935:452–461
Chen X, Gilkeson RC, Feia B (2007) Automatic 3D-to-2D registration for CT and dual-energy digital radiography for calcification detection. Med Phys 34(12):4934–4943
Weese J, Penney GP, Desmedt P, Hill DLG, Hawkes DJ (1997) Voxel-based 2-D/3-D registration of fluoroscopy images and CT scans for image-guided surgery. IEEE Trans Info Technol Biomed 1(4):284–293
Kalinic H, Loncaric S, Bijnens B (2011) A novel image similarity measure for image registration. 7th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis (ISPA), 2011
Itou T, Shinohara H, Sakaguchi K, Hashimoto T, Yokoi T, Souma T (2011) Multimodal image registration using IECC as the similarity measure. Med Phys 38(2):1103–1115
Maintz J, Viergever M (1998) A survey of medical image registration, Med Image Anal 2(1):1–36
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shalaby, A., Farag, A., Mostafa, E., Hockenbury, T. (2014). 2D–3D Registration: A Step Towards Image-Guided Ankle Fusion. In: Tavares, J., Luo, X., Li, S. (eds) Bio-Imaging and Visualization for Patient-Customized Simulations. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03590-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03590-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03589-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03590-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)