Skip to main content

Gentrification

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urbanisation, unlimited

Abstract

Gentrification is neither more nor less than the reconquista of the bourgeois city by the bourgeois. It produces brass doorplates and professionally landscaped front yards. Buildings solidify and surfaces become more durable. Proprietors replace tenants. But is there any other way to introduce capital into the life cycle of an urban neighbourhood? Does urban development allow any stable condition between desertification by affluence on one side and picturesque poverty on the other?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term coined for the progressing transformation of New York’s Lower East Side (Smith and Williams 1986).

  2. 2.

    For Smith (1987), gentrification is essentially driven by an economic logic: in his theory of the rent-gap, he describes the situation in which the difference between the revenue of a property in the current situation and its potential rental revenue, given the central location and good access conditions, motivates investors and results in the eviction of current dwellers.

  3. 3.

    As Bruegmann (1996) points out, gentrification can hardly be described by statistical means. Early gentrifiers often have an income which is lower than that of the previous dwellers, and the decline in population numbers can be attributed both to decline and rise in affluence.

  4. 4.

    Lefebvre (1974).

  5. 5.

    “The urban parcel is above all a model of distribution. The primary message is that it does not serve the city well if urban land is controlled by one only, even if it is the state itself…. There should be at least a taming of property by market mechanisms, by competition among many and by the rights deducted from ownership guaranteed for those who are not owners…” (Hoffmann-Axthelm (1990), translation by the author).

  6. 6.

    Sieverts (1997) has identified this aspect as one of the reasons for the lack of cultural strategies for the space he named Zwischenstadt.

  7. 7.

    On the other hand, it must not be overlooked that tenant protection also raises the threshold for those seeking rental accommodation.

  8. 8.

    Wohlstandsverödung, in Fiedler (2004).

  9. 9.

    See Smith (1979) and London and Palen (1984).

  10. 10.

    Before reunification, residents of Berlin were not drafted for army service, which resulted in a particularly large young population.

  11. 11.

    Translated as builders collectives in Ring (2013).

  12. 12.

    One element of the Baugruppen mode is that site and building costs are shared by group members based on actual cost, instead of fixed-price arrangements with commercial developers. This mode allows saving on the developer’s profit but also entails the risks of unexpected building costs and that group members might drop out of the project.

  13. 13.

    Kees Christiaanse, in his opening speech for the Architecture Biennale Open City (Amsterdam, October 2, 2009): “The enemy of the open city is the open city itself: the self-destruction of diversity; gentrification, slumming, clotting….”

References

  • Bruegmann R (1996) The American city. In: Cohen MA, Ruble BA, Tulchin JS, Garland AM (eds) Preparing for the urban future. The Woodrow Wilson Center Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiedler J (2004) Urbanisierung, globale. Böhlau Verlag, Wien/Köln/Weimar

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann-Axthelm D (1990) Warum Stadtplanung in Parzellen vor sich gehen muss; in: Bauwelt 48

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre H (1974) La Production d’Espace. English: The production of space. Blackwell, Malden, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • London B, Palen J (1984) Gentrification, displacement, and neighborhood revitalization. State of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Ring K (2013) In: Senatsverwaltung Berlin (ed) Self made city. Jovis, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieverts T (1997) Zwischenstadt; Bauwelt Fundamente 118. English: Cities without cities – an interpretation of the Zwischenstadt. Taylor and Francis, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith N (1979) Toward a theory of gentrification: a back to the city movement by capital, not people. J Am Plan Assoc 45(4):538–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith N (1987) Gentrification and the rent-gap. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 77:462–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith N, Williams P (1986) Gentrification of the city. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fiedler, J. (2014). Gentrification. In: Urbanisation, unlimited. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03587-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics