Skip to main content

Warrant-Hiding Delegation-by-Certificate Proxy Signature Schemes

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 8250))

Abstract

Proxy signatures allow an entity (the delegator) to delegate his signing capabilities to other entities (called proxies), who can then produce signatures on behalf of the delegator. Typically, a delegator may not want to give a proxy the power to sign any message on his behalf, but only messages from a well defined message space. Therefore, the so called delegation by warrant approach has been introduced. Here, a warrant is included into the delegator’s signature (the so called certificate) to describe the message space from which a proxy is allowed to choose messages to produce valid signatures for. Interestingly, in all previously known constructions of proxy signatures following this approach, the warrant is made explicit and, thus, is an input to the verification algorithm of a proxy signature. This means, that a verifier learns the entire message space for which the proxy has been given the signing power. However, it may be desirable to hide the remaining messages in the allowed message space from a verifier. This scenario has never been investigated in context of proxy signatures, but seems to be interesting for practical applications. In this paper, we resolve this issue by introducing so called warrant-hiding proxy signatures. We provide a formal security definition of such schemes by augmenting the well established security model for proxy signatures by Boldyreva et al. Furthermore, we discuss strategies how to realize this warrant-hiding property and we also provide two concrete instantiations of such a scheme. They enjoy different advantages, but are both entirely practical. Moreover, we prove them secure with respect to the augmented security model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. An, J.H., Dodis, Y., Rabin, T.: On the security of joint signature and encryption. In: Knudsen, L.R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2332, pp. 83–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Awasthi, A.K., Lal, S.: ID-based Ring Signature and Proxy Ring Signature Schemes from Bilinear Pairings. I. J. Network Security 4(2), 187–192 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Benaloh, J.C., de Mare, M.: One-Way Accumulators: A Decentralized Alternative to Digital Signatures. In: Helleseth, T. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1993. LNCS, vol. 765, pp. 274–285. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Boldyreva, A., Palacio, A., Warinschi, B.: Secure proxy signature schemes for delegation of signing rights. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2003, 96 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boldyreva, A., Palacio, A., Warinschi, B.: Secure Proxy Signature Schemes for Delegation of Signing Rights. J. Cryptology 25(1), 57–115 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Catalano, D., Fiore, D.: Vector Commitments and Their Applications. In: Kurosawa, K., Hanaoka, G. (eds.) PKC 2013. LNCS, vol. 7778, pp. 55–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Catalano, D., Fiore, D., Messina, M.: Zero-Knowledge Sets with Short Proofs. In: Smart, N.P. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2008. LNCS, vol. 4965, pp. 433–450. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Chase, M., Healy, A., Lysyanskaya, A., Malkin, T., Reyzin, L.: Mercurial Commitments with Applications to Zero-Knowledge Sets. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3494, pp. 422–439. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Fuchsbauer, G., Pointcheval, D.: Anonymous Proxy Signatures. In: Ostrovsky, R., De Prisco, R., Visconti, I. (eds.) SCN 2008. LNCS, vol. 5229, pp. 201–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., Rivest, R.L.: A Digital Signature Scheme Secure Against Adaptive Chosen-Message Attacks. SIAM J. Comput. 17(2), 281–308 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanser, C., Slamanig, D.: Warrant-Hiding Delegation-by-Certificate Proxy Signature Schemes. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2013/ (2013), http://eprint.iacr.org/2013/544

  12. Kate, A., Zaverucha, G.M., Goldberg, I.: Constant-Size Commitments to Polynomials and Their Applications. In: Abe, M. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6477, pp. 177–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Mambo, M., Usuda, K., Okamoto, E.: Proxy Signatures for Delegating Signing Operation. In: ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS 1996), pp. 48–57. ACM (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Micali, S., Rabin, M.O., Kilian, J.: Zero-Knowledge Sets. In: Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 80–91. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen, T.P.: Non-Interactive and Information-Theoretic Secure Verifiable Secret Sharing. In: Feigenbaum, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 1991. LNCS, vol. 576, pp. 129–140. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schuldt, J.C.N., Matsuura, K., Paterson, K.G.: Proxy Signatures Secure Against Proxy Key Exposure. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) PKC 2008. LNCS, vol. 4939, pp. 141–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Steinfeld, R., Bull, L., Zheng, Y.: Content Extraction Signatures. In: Kim, K.-c. (ed.) ICISC 2001. LNCS, vol. 2288, pp. 285–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan, Z., Liu, Z., Tang, C.: Digital Proxy Blind Signature Schemes Based on DLP and ECDLP. Tech. rep., MM Research Preprints, MMRC, AMSS, Academia, Sinica, Beijing (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, G.: Designated-verifier proxy signatures for e-commerce. In: IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, ICME 2004, pp. 1731–1734 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, H., Pieprzyk, J.: Efficient One-Time Proxy Signatures. In: Laih, C.-S. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2894, pp. 507–522. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, K.: Threshold Proxy Signature Schemes. In: Okamoto, E., Davida, G., Mambo, M. (eds.) ISW 1997. LNCS, vol. 1396, pp. 282–290. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hanser, C., Slamanig, D. (2013). Warrant-Hiding Delegation-by-Certificate Proxy Signature Schemes. In: Paul, G., Vaudenay, S. (eds) Progress in Cryptology – INDOCRYPT 2013. INDOCRYPT 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8250. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03515-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03515-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03514-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03515-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics