Advertisement

Bunkers: Edifices of Abomination or Heritage Sites?

Changing Perceptions of German Bunkers
  • Gillian CarrEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Contributions To Global Historical Archaeology book series (CGHA, volume 40)

Abstract

More than 50 years after Paul Virilio walked along the beaches of Brittany and nearly 70 years after it was built, the seven European countries which played host to the Atlantic Wall are still finding ways to deal with their concrete legacy of occupation and war, still going through phases of destruction and preservation, neglect, conservation, reuse and restoration. Many old bunkers have been turned into occupation museums; others have been restored to how they would have looked during the war. Because many were built using slave or forced labour, or even local ‘collaborators’, German bunkers across Europe are difficult heritage. And because the contribution of these groups are often excluded or marginalised in heritage presentation inside bunkers, they are also dissonant heritage. Instead, bunkers are frequently used as symbolic space of a very particular kind, where memories, identities, and attitudes towards, and perceptions and narratives of, occupation can be expressed by and controlled by specific groups. This chapter explores and seeks to interpret the particular situation in the Channel Islands, where restoration has often been controversial, and proposes future strategies for ethical heritage presentation.

Keywords

Atlantic Wall Organisation Todt Dissonant heritage Symbolic space Restoration Rehabilitation CIOS Erasure Amnesia Noirmont point Bunker life cycle Nostalgia Therapy (restoration as) Ethics Michael Ginns 

References

  1. Amy, M. (2007). Do they ever come back? Engelbert Hoppe—return of the reluctant soldier. Channel Islands Occupation Review, 35, 47–80.Google Scholar
  2. Anon. (1944). Retain the fortifications. Channel Islands Monthly Review: Journal of Channel Islands Refugees in Great Britain, 7(5), 1.Google Scholar
  3. Aubin, H. (2009). Do they ever come back? Channel Islands Occupation Review, 37, 102–104.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, M. M. (1997). The ghosts of place. Theory and Society, 26, 813–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bender, B. (1993). Introduction: Landscape—meaning and action. In B. Bender (Ed.), Landscape: Politics and perspectives (pp. 1–17). Providence: Berg.Google Scholar
  6. Bourgaize, P. (2004). Do they ever come back?—Paul Sommerfeld. Channel Islands Occupation Review, 32, 56–61.Google Scholar
  7. Boym, S. (2001). The future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Bunting, M. (1995). The model occupation. London: BCA.Google Scholar
  9. Bunting, M. (2004, January 24). Our part in the Holocaust. One Channel Island at least is owning up to its wartime shame. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, K. (2008). Valuing the Heritage of the Channel Islands: An initial assessment against world heritage site criteria and public value criteria. Jersey: Jersey Heritage. http://www.gov.je/SiteCollectionDocuments/Government%20and%20administration/R%20ValuingHeritageofC.I%2020080801%20KCA.pdf.
  11. Cohen, F. (2000). The Jews in the Channel Islands during the German Occupation 19401945. Jersey Heritage Trust: Jersey, in association with The Institute of Contemporary History and Wiener Library Ltd: London.Google Scholar
  12. Costard, M. (1991). Editorial. Channel Islands Occupation Review, 19, 4–5.Google Scholar
  13. Coysh, V. (1944). Those fortifications: letter to the editor. Channel Islands monthly review. Journal of Channel Islands Refugees in Great Britain, 7, 6.Google Scholar
  14. Coysh, V. (1975, November 25). Martello towers—part of the local scene! Guernsey Evening Press, p. 9.Google Scholar
  15. Davenport, T. (2003). Festung Alderney: The German defences of Alderney. The Alderney Society: CIOS (Guernsey)/Barnes Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Davenport, T. (2006). Alderney preservation progress. Channel Islands Occupation Society Review, 34, 51–57.Google Scholar
  17. Dryden, M. (1998, December 17). Welcome to Hitlerworld. Jersey Evening Post.Google Scholar
  18. Eglot, J. (2011). Swastikas fly high in Guernsey. Jewish Chronicle Online, 8 September 2011. http://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/54326/swastikas-fly-high-guernsey.
  19. Fooks, M. (1985, May 3). Seal old German bunkers to stop missing youngsters hiding. Guernsey Evening Press, p. 20.Google Scholar
  20. Foote, K. E. (2003) [1997]. Shadowed ground: America’s landscapes of violence and tragedy. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  21. Galaty, M., Stocker, S. R., & Watkinson, C. (1999). Beyond bunkers: domination, resistance and change in an Albanian regional landscape. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, 12(2), 197–214.Google Scholar
  22. Gavey, E. (1997). A guide to German fortifications on Guernsey. Guernsey: Guernsey Armouries.Google Scholar
  23. Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ginns, M. (1978) [1975]. German fortifications in Jersey. Jersey: Meadowbank Trading Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
  25. Ginns, M. (1985). Operation ‘Nest Egg’ and Task Force 135. Channel Islands Occupation Society Review, 10, 19–49.Google Scholar
  26. Ginns, M. (1986) Sites of Special Interest. German Fortifications: Report on sites of German defensive structures in Jersey of military and architectural importance. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
  27. Ginns, M. (1999a) Jersey’s German Bunkers. Channel Islands Occupation Society Archive Book no. 9, Jersey.Google Scholar
  28. Ginns, M. (1999b January 5). Publicity shot for castle of the future. Jersey Evening Post.Google Scholar
  29. Ginns, M. (2006) [1994]. The organisation Todt and the fortress engineers in the Channel Islands. Channel Islands Occupation Society Archive Book no. 8, Jersey.Google Scholar
  30. Heath, R. (2011, September 10). Boat owner flies flag—for the Nazis. Jersey Evening Post, p. 12.Google Scholar
  31. Hirsch, M. (1996). Past lives: Postmemories in Exile. Poetics Today, 17, 659–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hutchison, J. (2008, August 7). Cohen abstains from decision over Occupation bunker move. Jersey Evening Post, p. 7.Google Scholar
  33. Kreckeler, D., Partridge, C.W. (1979). Survey and Classification of German Military Structures and Sites in Guernsey, 19401945. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
  34. Lagrou, P. (2000). The legacy of the Nazi occupation: Patriotic memory and national recovery in Western Europe, 1945–1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lehrer, E. (2010). Can there be a conciliatory heritage? International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(4–5), 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lewis, A. (1998a December 22). Call for ‘more human’ history. Jersey Evening Post, p.3.Google Scholar
  37. Lewis, A. (1998b, December 23). In the wake of that tourism picture and the controversy it caused … is it time to rethink our bunker mentality? Jersey Evening Post, pp. 8–9.Google Scholar
  38. Long, C., & Reeves, K. (2009). ‘Dig a hole and bury the past in it’: reconciliation and the heritage of genocide in Cambodia. In W. Logan & K. Reeves (Eds.), Places of pain and shame: Dealing with difficult heritage (pp. 68–81). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Lowenthal, D. (2003). Tragic traces on the Rhodian shore. Historic Environment, 17(1), 3–7.Google Scholar
  40. Macdonald, S. (2006a). Words in stone? Agency and identity in a Nazi landscape. Journal of Material Culture 11(1/2), 105–126.Google Scholar
  41. Macdonald, S. (2006b). Undesirable heritage: Fascist material culture and historical consciousness in Nuremberg. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12(1), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Macdonald, S. (2009a). Difficult Heritage: negotiating the Nazi past in Nuremberg and beyond. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Macdonald, S. (2009b). Unsettling memories: intervention and controversy over difficult public heritage. In M. Anico & E. Peralta (Eds.), Heritage and identity: Engagement and demission in the contemporary world (pp. 93–104). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Mahy, E. (1992, June 16). Enchanted places full of dark secrets. Guernsey Evening Press, p. 17.Google Scholar
  45. Meskell, L., & Scheermeyer, C. (2008). Heritage as therapy: Set pieces from the new South Africa. Journal of Material Culture, 13(2), 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ogier, M. (1993, October 28). Fortress plan stands firm against attack. Guernsey Evening Press.Google Scholar
  47. Partridge, C., & Davenport, T. (1993). The fortifications of Alderney. Alderney: Alderney Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Peckham, R. S. (2003). Mourning heritage: memory, trauma and restitution. In R. S. Peckham (Ed.), Rethinking Heritage: Cultures and politics in Europe (pp. 205–214). London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  49. Pouteaux, J. (2011a, September 7). Demand for Nazi items ‘too strong’ to ignore. Guernsey Evening Press, p. 1.Google Scholar
  50. Pouteaux, J. (2011b, September, 9). Swastika flag shop boss ‘in fear’ after hate calls. Guernsey Evening Press, p. 1.Google Scholar
  51. Sanders, P. (2005). The British Channel Islands under German Occupation 1940–1945. Jersey: Jersey Heritage Trust and Société Jersiaise.Google Scholar
  52. Schofield, J. (2002). Monuments and the memories of war: motivations for preserving military sites in England. In J. Schofield, W. G. Johnson, & C. M. Beck (Eds.), Matériel culture: The archaeology of twentieth century conflict (pp. 143–158). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schofield, H. (2011, September 13). Hitler’s Atlantic Wall: Should France preserve it? BBC News Magazine, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-10632543.
  54. Smart, N. (1996). The Maginot Line: an indestructible inheritance. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 2(4), 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the pain of others. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  56. Till, K. (2005). The New Berlin: Memory, politics, place. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  57. Tunbridge, J. E., & Ashworth, G. J. (Eds.). (1996). Dissonant Heritage: The management of the past as a resource in conflict. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  58. Turner, B. (2010). Outpost of Occupation: How the Channel Islands survived Nazi rule 1940–1945. London: Aurum Press.Google Scholar
  59. Uzzell, D. L. (1989). The hot interpretation of war and conflict. In D. L. Uzzell (Ed.), Heritage interpretation volume I: The natural and built environment (pp. 33–47). London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
  60. Uzzell, D., Ballantyne, R. (2008). Heritage that hurts: interpretation in a postmodern world. In G. Fairclough, R. Harrison, J.H. Jameson Jnr, J. Schofield (Eds.), The Heritage Reader (pp. 502–513). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Virilio, P. (1994). Bunker archaeology. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  62. Vitaliev, V. (1998, December 10). Showing off the sites of shame. The Guardian, p. 4.Google Scholar
  63. Walton, M. (1999, January 2). Keep bureaucracy away from the Occupation Society’s restorations. Jersey Evening Post.Google Scholar
  64. Wood, A., & Wood, M. (1955). Islands in danger. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Catharine’s CollegeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations