Abstract
One way to understand the notion of Morphogenesis Unbound is to focus on the meso level of society, i.e. to look at society as an ‘organizational society’ and to think about the co-evolution of structure, agency and culture – the three dimensions of Archer’s sociology, analytically speaking – in that context. This co-evolutionary vision happens to be very close to the research program of neo-structural sociology. To illustrate this insight, one neo-structural method, multilevel network analysis through linked design, is applied to a set of empirical data so as to propose a network translation of Morphogenesis Unbound and observe its outcome. This chapter reports results in which actors create new relationships beyond the boundaries of the organization with which they are affiliated, thus reshaping/expanding their own personal opportunity structure beyond the limitations imposed upon them by pre-existing structures. Half the population of the innovators observed (here: highly competitive scientists) deploy ‘independentist’ strategies, i.e. all the new personal ties that they develop in their network among the elite of colleagues of their profession are beyond the constraining perimeter predefined by their organization’s inter-organizational network. The kind of organization that they might create would not establish inter-organizational ties with their current organization. Over time, measurements suggest that this independence takes them close to Nowhere in terms of further achievements. Slightly more pedestrian forms of Morphogenesis, i.e. perhaps less Unbound, based on a relational strategy called here ‘individualist’, in which actors keep a strong foot in the organization in which they are affiliated so as to use its resources to create a new set of ties – and eventually a new organization – outside their current organization’s perimeter, seem to be of a more rewarding kind of networks to Somewhere closer to the “prizes [that] go to those who will explore and can manipulate contingent cultural compatibilities to their advantage” (Archer 2012). In this latter case, even if some of the opportunities that they could create for themselves are hoarded by their current organization (or boss). Such neo-structural measurements of Morphogenesis are used to start thinking about situations in which the two generative mechanisms identified by Archer (2012), competition and opportunity, coexist; as differentiated from the situations in which the latter would replace the former. Indeed creating new ties with heterogeneous actors, beyond one’s current position and sometimes even new kinds of organizations, is a highly cultural form of agency. Breiger’s notion of ‘weak culture’ helps speculate about actors’ capacity to reshape opportunity structures by reaching heterogeneous alters in spite of resistance from a rather stable, change-averse, tightly-connected organizational society promoting ordinary incremental innovation that will not challenge pre-existing entrenched interests.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Since this creates dynamics of multilevel networks with different levels of agency, a new family of models is needed to account for such dynamics. We think this family of models is a multilevel extension of Snijders (2001) model of dynamics of networks, using characteristics of level 2 network as set of exogenous factors in the evolution of level 1 network, and the other way around. The coevolution of both level networks is added to the coevolution of behavior and relational choices. In terms of model specification, new ‘independent’ variables from inter-organizational networks operate at the inter-individual level, and vice-versa.
- 3.
Moreover, the chains of interactions between tie generation at different levels are not necessarily centred around subordinates. Sometimes cooperation between superiors and subordinates facilitate or hinder the development of such chains and restructuration (Lazega et~al. 2013).
References
Archer, M. S. (1982). Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. British Journal of Sociology, 35, 455–483.
Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. S. (Ed.). (2013a). Introduction. Social morphogenesis. New York: Springer.
Archer, M. S. (2013b, January 16–18). The generative mechanisms re-configuring late modernity. Paper prepared for 2013 Lausanne workshop ‘Morphogenic Society’ as a potential new social formation?’. Centre for Social Ontology, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
Breiger, R. L. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces, 53, 181–190.
Breiger, R. L. (2010). Dualities of culture and structure: Seeing through cultural holes. In J. Fuhse & S. Mützel (Eds.), Relationale Soziologie: Zur kulturellen Wende der Netzwerkforschung (pp. 37–47). Wiesbaden: Springer.
Donati, P. (2010). Relational sociology. A new paradigm for the social sciences. London: Routledge.
Fararo, T. J., & Doreian, P. (1984). Tripartite structural analysis: Generalizing the Breiger-Wilson formalism. Social Networks, 6, 141–175.
Lazega, E. (1992). Micropolitics of knowledge. Communication and indirect control in workgroups. New York: Aldine-de Gruyter.
Lazega, E. (2003). Rationalité, discipline sociale et structure. Revue française de sociologie, 44, 305–330.
Lazega, E. (2006). Capital social, processus sociaux et capacité d’action collective. In A. Bevort & M. Lallement (Eds.), Capital social (pp. 213–225). Paris: La Découverte.
Lazega, E. (2011). Pertinence et structure. Revue Suisse de Sociologie, 37, 127–149.
Lazega, E. (2012). Sociologie néo-structurale. In R. Keucheyan et G. Bronner (Eds.), Introduction à la théorie sociale contemporaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Lazega, E. (2014, forthcoming). Coevolution of appropriateness and structure in organizations: Secondary socialization through dynamics of advice networks and weak culture. In D. J. Brass, Giuseppe (Joe) Labianca, A. Mehra, D. S. Halgin, & S. P. Borgatti (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Contemporary perspectives on organizational social networks, Vol. 40, pp. 377–398).
Lazega, E., & Pattison, P. (2001). Social capital as social mechanisms and collective assets: The example of status auctions among colleagues. In N. Lin, K. Cook, & R. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 185–208). New York: Aldine-de Gruyter.
Lazega, E., Jourda, M., Mounier, L., & Stofer, R. (2007). Des poissons et des mares: l’analyse de réseaux multi-niveaux. Revue française de sociologie, 48, 93–131.
Lazega, E., Jourda, M., Mounier, L., & Stofer, R. (2008). Catching up with big fish in the big pond ? Multi-level network analysis through linked design. Social Networks, 30, 157–176.
Lazega, E., Jourda, M., & Mounier, L. (2013). Network lift from dual alters: Extended opportunity structures from a multilevel and structural perspective. European Sociological Review. doi:10.1093/esr/jct002.
Perrow, C. (1991). A society of organizations. Theory and Society, 20, 725–762.
Schultz, J., & Breiger, R. L. (2010). The strength of weak culture. Poetics: Journal of Empirical Research on Culture, the Media, and the Arts, 38, 610–624. doi:>10.1016/j.poetic.2010.09.002#http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2010.09.002.
Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In M. E. Sobel & M. P. Becker (Eds.), Sociological methodology − 2001 (pp. 361–395). Boston/London: Basil Blackwell.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multi-level Analysis. London: Sage.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. London: Benjamin/ Cummings.
Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
White, H. C. (1970). Chains of opportunity: System models of mobility in organizations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
White, H., Boorman, S., & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81, 730–780.
Wilson, T. P. (1982). Relational networks: An extension of sociometric concepts. Social Networks, 4, 105–116.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lazega, E. (2014). ‘Morphogenesis Unbound’ from the Dynamics of Multilevel Networks: A Neo-structural Perspective. In: Archer, M. (eds) Late Modernity. Social Morphogenesis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03266-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03266-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03265-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03266-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)