Skip to main content

The Three Dimensions of Social Prominence

  • Conference paper
Book cover Social Informatics (SocInfo 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8238))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

One classic problem definition in social network analysis is the study of diffusion in networks, which enables us to tackle problems like favoring the adoption of positive technologies. Most of the attention has been turned to how to maximize the number of influenced nodes, but this approach misses the fact that different scenarios imply different diffusion dynamics, only slightly related to maximizing the number of nodes involved. In this paper we measure three different dimensions of social prominence: the Width, i.e. the ratio of neighbors influenced by a node; the Depth, i.e. the degrees of separation from a node to the nodes perceiving its prominence; and the Strength, i.e. the intensity of the prominence of a node. By defining a procedure to extract prominent users in complex networks, we detect associations between the three dimensions of social prominence and classical network statistics. We validate our results on a social network extracted from the Last.Fm music platform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berlingerio, M., Coscia, M., Giannotti, F.: Mining the temporal dimension of the information propagation. In: Adams, N.M., Robardet, C., Siebes, A., Boulicaut, J.-F. (eds.) IDA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5772, pp. 237–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Burt, R.S.: Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology 92(6), 1287–1335 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., Gummadi, K.P.: Measuring user influence in twitter: The million follower fallacy. In: ICWSM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christakis, N.A., Fowler, J.H.: The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine 357(4), 370–379 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Christakis, N.A., Fowler, J.H.: The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New England Jou. of Medicine 358(21), 2249–2258 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Colizza, V., Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M., Valleron, A.-J., Vespignani, A.: Modeling the worldwide spread of pandemic influenza: Baseline case and containment interventions. PLoS Medicine 4(1), e13 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cordella, L.P., Foggia, P., Sansone, C., Vento, M.: A (sub)graph isomorphism algorithm for matching large graphs. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 26(10), 1367–1372 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coscia, M.: Competition and success in the meme pool: a case study on quickmeme.com. In: ICWSM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fowler, J.H., Christakis, N.A.: Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the framingham heart study. Bmj Clinical Research Ed. 337(2), a2338–a2338 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goyal, A., Bonchi, F., Lakshmanan, L.V.S.: Discovering leaders from community actions. In: CIKM, pp. 499–508 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kermack, W.O., McKendrick, A.G.: A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. The Royal Society of London Series A 115(772), 700–721 (1927)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiang, M.Y., Kumar, A.: A comparative analysis of an extended som network and k-means analysis. Int. J. Know.-Based Intell. Eng. Syst. 8(1), 9–15 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kohonen, T.: The self-organizing map. IEEE 78, 1464–1480 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar, U.A., Dhamija, Y.: A comparative analysis of som neural network with k-means clustering algorithm. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, pp. 55–59 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, Y.-Y., Slotine, J.-J., Barabasi, A.-L.: Controllability of complex networks. Nature 473(7346), 167–173 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pastor-Satorras, R., Vespignani, A.: Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Physical Review Letters 86(14), 3200–3203 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang, P., González, M.C., Hidalgo, C.A., Barabási, A.-L.: Understanding the spreading patterns of mobile phone viruses. Science 324(5930), 1071–1076 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pennacchioli, D., Rossetti, G., Pappalardo, L., Pedreschi, D., Giannotti, F., Coscia, M. (2013). The Three Dimensions of Social Prominence. In: Jatowt, A., et al. Social Informatics. SocInfo 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8238. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03260-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03260-3_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03259-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03260-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics