Skip to main content

Part of the book series: UNITEXT ((UNITEXTMAT,volume 79))

  • 2696 Accesses

Abstract

Stories of lambs and wolves have been told since a very long time and the interaction between predators and preys represent the most dramatic aspect of the struggle for life 2. The incipit of Fedro's fable seems to deal with a case of competition … for the resource of a rivum eundem … but we should not trust on the wolf's complaint … since the beginning of the world wolves are wolves and lambs are lambs … each of the two species plays a precise role in the scheme of Nature … the struggle is unfair and the conclusion well expected …

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1 The Wolf and the Lamb/ By thirst incited; to the brook/ The Wolf and Lamb themselves betook./ The Wolf high up the current drank,/ The Lamb far lower down the bank./ Then, bent his ravenous maw to cram,/ The Wolf took umbrage at the Lamb./ “How dare you trouble all the flood,/ And mingle my good drink with mud?”/ “Sir,” says the Lambkin, sore afraID,/ “How should I act, as you upbraID?/ The thing you mention cannot be,/ The stream descends from you to me.”/ Abash'd by facts, says he, “I know/ 'Tis now exact six months ago/ You strove my honest fame to blot” –/ “Six months ago, sir, I was not.”/ “Then 'twas th’ old ram thy sire,” he cried,/ And so he tore him, till he died./ To those this fable I address/ Who are determined to oppress,/ And trump up any false pretence,/ But they will injure innocence./ (Translation by Christopher Smart 1913)

  2. 2.

    2 The struggle for life came to the fore with Charles Darwin and “The Origin of Species”. Later, at the beginning of the twentieth century, Life Struggle, Struggle for Existence, Lutte pour la Vie … were the ways Alfred Lotka, Georgii Frantsevich Gause, Vito Volterra named the subject of their studies (see 6, 8, 16).

  3. 3.

    3 Actually in 12 the model is not explicitly formulated in terms of differential equations. Nevertheless the model is usually named after Rosenzweig and MacArthur because the shape of the isocline reflects the graphical description discussed in the paper.

References

  1. Abrams, P.A., Ginzburg, L.R.: The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither?. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15, 337–341 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Casagrandi, R., De Leo, G., Gatto, M.: 101 problemi di ecologia. McGraw-Hill (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, K.: Uniqueness of a limit cycle for a predator-prey system. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 12, 541–548 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. D'Ancona, U.: Der Kampf ums Dasein. Gebrüder Borntraeger (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Elton, C., Nicholson, M.: The ten-year cycle in numbers of the lynx in Canada. Journal of Animal Ecology 11, 215–244 (1942)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gause, G.F.: The Struggle for Existence. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore (1934)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Kolmogorov, A.: Sulla teoria di Volterra della lotta per l'esistenza, Giornale dell'Istituto Ital iano degli Attuari 7, 74–80 (1936)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lotka, A.J.: Elements of Mathematical Biology. Dover, New York (1956)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Messier, F.: Ungulate population models with predation : a case-study with the North-American moose. Ecology 75, 478–488 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Monod, J.: La technique de culture continue: théorie et applications. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 79, 390–410 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Novick, A., Szilard, L.: Description of the chemostat, Science 112, 715–716 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenzweig, M.L., MacArthur, R.H.: Graphical representation and stability conditions of predator-prey interactions. The American Naturalist 97, 209–223 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenzweig, M.L.: Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science, new series 171, 385–387 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, H.L., Waltman, P.: The Theory of the Chemostat. Cambrige University Press, CambrIDge (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Turchin, P.: Complex Population Dynamics: a theoretical/empirical syntesis. Monographs in population Biology, 35, Princeton University Press, New Jersey (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Volterra, V.: Lecons sur la Théorie Mathématique de la Lutte pour la Vie. Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1931)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Iannelli, M., Pugliese, A. (2014). Predator-prey models. In: An Introduction to Mathematical Population Dynamics. UNITEXT(), vol 79. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03026-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics