Effect of Substrate Temperature on the Structural and Optical Properties of CdTe Films Prepared by Thermal Evaporation

  • Lalhriatzuala
  • Ramakrishna Madaka
  • Pratima Agarwal
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)


CdTe thin films are prepared on corning 1,737 glass using simple thermal evaporation technique at three different substrate temperatures, viz., room temperature, 100 and 200 °C. The dependence of the structural and optical properties of the prepared films on the substrate temperature at the time of deposition is studied using X-ray diffraction, UV–Vis–NIR spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy. The prepared films at higher substrate temperature are having larger grain size and also improved crystallinity. Small changes in the optical band gap and the refractive index are observed. The films prepared at 200 °C have the lowest energy band gap of about 1.45 eV and also highest refractive index. Three phonon modes, i.e., Te–Te A1, LO and TO modes are observed in all the samples. The phonon band centers of the observed modes are slightly blue shifted with increase in substrate temperature. Observed significant broadening in the phonon modes in comparison to the bulk values could be due to the confinement effect in nanocrystals. The surface morphology of the films is studied using field emission scanning electron microscope.


II-VI compounds Nanocrystals and phonon modes 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors’ are grateful to Central Instruments Facility, IIT Guwahati for providing facilities for FESEM and Raman measurements.


  1. 1.
    Alvin D. Compaan, Akhlesh Gupta, Sunghyun Lee, Shanli Wang, Jennifer Drayton, Solar Energy, 77, 815(2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Ferekides, S. Marinskaya, D. Marinskiy, V. Palekis, D. L. Morel, Proceedings of the Second World PSEC Conference,1085(1998).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Romeo, V. Canevari, Thin Solid Films, 143, 193 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Lalitha, S. Zh. Karazhanov, P. Ravindran, S. Senthilarasu, R. Sathyamoorthy, J. Janabergenov, Physica B, 387, 227(2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Ashraf, S.M.J. Akhtar, A.F. Khan, Z. Ali, A. Qayyum, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 509, 2414(2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Swanepoel, Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments, 16, 1214 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jacques I. Pankove, Optical Processes in Semiconductors, (Dover Publications Inc, New York, 1971).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu. P. Rakovich, J.F. Donegan, N. Gaponik, A.L. Rogach, Applied Physics Letters, 83, 2539 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Ghosh, S. Hussain, D. Ghosh, R. Bhar, A.K. Pal, Physica B, 407, 4214 (2012).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Saravana Kumar, M. Abdul Khadar, S.K. Dhara, T.R. Ravindran, K.G.M. Nair, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 251, 435 (2006).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.S. Pine, G. Dresselhaus, Physical Review B, 4, 356 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.A. Berding, Physical Review B, 60, 8943 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lalhriatzuala
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ramakrishna Madaka
    • 1
  • Pratima Agarwal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsIndian Institute of TechnologyGuwahatiIndia
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsPachhunga University CollegeAizawlIndia

Personalised recommendations