Advertisement

A Geometrical Approach for Age-Invariant Face Recognition

  • Amal Seralkhatem Osman Ali
  • Vijanth Sagayan a/l Asirvadam
  • Aamir Saeed Malik
  • Azrina Aziz
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8237)

Abstract

Human faces undergo considerable amounts of variations with aging. While face recognition systems have proven to be sensitive to factors such as illumination and pose, their sensitivity to facial aging effects is yet to be studied. The FRVT (Face Recognition Vendor Test) report estimated a decrease in performance by approximately 5% for each year of age difference. Therefore, the development of age-invariant capability remains an important issue for robust face recognition. This research study proposed a geometrical model based on multiple triangular features for the purpose of handling the challenge of face age variations that affect the process of face recognition. The system is aimed to serve in real time applications where the test images are usually taken in random scales that may not be of the same scale as the probe image, along with orientation, lighting ,illumination, and pose variations. Multiple mathematical equations were developed and used in the process of forming distinct subject clusters. These clusters hold the results of applying the developed mathematical models over the FGNET face aging database. The system was able to achieve a maximum classification accuracy of above 99% when the system was tested over the entire FGNET database.

Keywords

frvt age-invariant geometrical model triangular features similarity proportion ratios clustering fgnet 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kachare, N.B., Inamdar, V.S.: Survey of Face Recognition Techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 - 8887) 1(19) (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ling, H., Soatto, S., Ramanathan, N., Jacobs, D.W.: Study of Face Recognition as People Age. In: Proc. 11th Int’l Conf. Computer Vision, pp. 1–8 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Toole, A., Vetter, T., Volz, H., Salter, M.: Three-dimensional caricatures of human heads: distinctiveness and the perception of facial age. Perception 26, 719–732 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ramanathan, N., Chellappa, R.: Face Verification across Age Progression. IEEE Trans. Image Processing 15(11), 3394–3361 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hall, M.A.: Correlation-based Feature Selection for Machine Learning. Department of Computer Science, Hamilton, New Zealand Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kononenko, I.: Estimating Attributes: Analysis and Extensions of RELIEF. In: European Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 171–182 (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ali, S.I., Shahzad, W.: A Feature Subset Selection Method based on Symmetric Uncertainty and Ant Colony Optimization. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887) 60(11) (December 2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leung, K.M.: Naive Bayesian Classifier, Polytechnic University Department Of Computer Science / Finance and Risk Engineering, Copyright c, mleung@poly.edu (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cortes, C., Vapnik, V.N.: Support-Vector Networks. Machine Learning 20 (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Viola, P., Jones, M.J.: Robust Real time Face Detection. International Journal of Computer Vision (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    MacQueen, J.B.: Some Methods for classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations. In: Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1, pp. 281–297. MR 0214227. Zbl 0214.46201. University of California Press (1967) (retrieved April 7, 2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cootes, T.F., Edwards, G.J., Taylor, C.J.: Active appearance models. In: Burkhardt, H., Neumann, B. (eds.) ECCV 1998. LNCS, vol. 1407, pp. 484–498. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bremner, D., Demaine, E., Erickson, J., Iacono, J., Langerman, S., Morin, P., Toussaint, G.: Output-sensitive algorithms for computing nearest-neighbor decision boundaries. Discrete and Computational Geometry 33(4), 593–604 (2005), doi:10.1007/s00454-004-1152-0MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCartin, B.J.: Mysteries of the equilateral triangle. Applied Mathematics Kettering University (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Everett, M.G., Borgatti, S.P.: The centrality of groups and classes. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 23(3), 181–201 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    FG-NET Aging Database (2010), http://www.fgnet.rsunit.com

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amal Seralkhatem Osman Ali
    • 2
  • Vijanth Sagayan a/l Asirvadam
    • 1
  • Aamir Saeed Malik
    • 1
  • Azrina Aziz
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre of Intelligent Signals and Imaging ResearchUniversiti Teknologi PETRONASTronohMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Electric and Electronic EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi PETRONASTronohMalaysia

Personalised recommendations