Advertisement

Interactivity and Animation Effects towards Student Enhancement of Learning in WAN Protocols

  • Nurul Hazra Abdul Salam
  • Riaza Mohd Rias
  • Wan Kadijah Yusof
  • Aisyah Abdul Manap
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8237)

Abstract

The development of multimedia educational software using available multimedia technologies has been proven as an effective tool to support teaching and learning process. It provides a good solution to the problem of introducing new learning and teaching techniques in education system. Therefore, this research is investigating a suitable technique to develop interactive multimedia application for effective learning. In this research, cognitive, constructive learning and metaphor of active learning theory was investigated as a potential technique that could be applied in this application. A statistical research study then follows which aims at finding out whether the animation and interactive environment in the courseware developed using learning techniques mentioned above can make learning more efficient and help student to increase their understanding in the subject of Data Communication & Networking. Collection and analysis of data was carried out quantitatively and qualitatively including survey on student learning tools preferences.

Keywords

animation learning wan interactive metaphor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2010) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animation (retrieved August 31, 2010)
  2. 2.
    Lawrence, A.W., Badre, A.M., Stasko, J.T.: Empirically evaluating the use of animations to teach algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, pp. 48–54. IEEE (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tversky, B., Morrison, J.B.: Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human Computer Studies 57(4), 247–262 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aris, B., Ahmad, M.H., Shiong, K.B., Ali, M.B., Harun, J., Tasir, Z.: Learning “Goal Programming” Using an Interactive Multimedia Courseware: Design Factors and Students’ Preferences. Department of Educational Multimedia Faculty of Education Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shaer, C.A., Cooper, M., Edwards, H.S.: Algorithm visualization: A report on the state of the field. In: SIGCSE 2007: Proceedings of the Thirty-eighth SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGSCE, pp. 150–154 (March 2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hundhausen, C.D., Douglas, S.A., Stasko, J.T.: A meta-study of software visualization effectiveness. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 13(3), 259–290 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cipolla-Ficarra, F.V., Cipolla-Ficarra, M.: Computer Animation and Communicability in Multimedia System: A Trichotomy Evaluation. In: Damiani, E., Jeong, J., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) New Directions in Intelligent Interactive Multimedia Systems and Services - 2. SCI, vol. 226, pp. 103–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, M., Yu, C., Min, L., Hu, G.: Development of an Animation-making Software Applied in Education, Engineering & Research Center for Information Technology on Education, HuaZhong Normal University Wuhan 430079, Hubei (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dick, W., Carey, L.: The Systematic Design of Instruction, 4th edn. Haper Collins College Publishers, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eng Hong, L., et al.: The Leaner Control Feature in Multimedia Learning Courseware Towards Learners with Different Cognitive Styles: A Proposed Research Framework. In: Third International Malaysian Educational Technology Convention (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Felder, R.M., Solomon, B.A.: Learning styles and strategies (2007), http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSdir/styles.htm (retrieved August 31, 2010)
  12. 12.
    Fred, P., Alexander, R., John, S.: Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments 38(1) (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huk, T.: Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability 22(6), 392–404 (December 2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wu, H.K., Shah, P.: Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning 88(3), 465–492 (May 2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stasko, J., Badre, A., Lewis, C.: Do algorithm animations assist learning?: an empirical study and analysis. In: Proceedings of the INTERCHI 1993 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, INTERCHI, pp. 61–66 (May 1993)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knicolas, K., Nizar, A., Ece, Y.: Using Computer Network Simulation Tools as Supplements to Computer Network Curriculum. In: Frontiers in Education (FIE 2000), October 18-21, pp. 13–16 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kyparisia, P., Mabbott, Bull, Grigoriadou: Designing learner-controlled educational interactions based on learning/cognitive style and learner behavior. Department of Informatics and Telecommunications, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, GR-15784 Athens, Greece (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Byrne, M.D., Catrambone, R., Stasko, J.T.: Evaluating animations as student aids in learning computer algorithms. Computers and Education 33(4), 253–278 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morozov, M., Markov, A.: How to make Courseware for School Interesting: New Metaphor in Educational Multimedia (2000) Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matthew, O., Wei, P., Elke, A.: Clutter Reduction in Multi-Dimensional Data Visualization Using Dimension Reordering. In: IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2004, October 10-12, pp. 89–96 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Overview of Learning Styles-Advanogy.com (2003-2007) (retrieved September 27, 2010) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Papanikolaou, K.A., Grigoriadou, M., Kornilakis, H., Magoulas, G.D.: Personalizing the interaction in a Web-based educational hypermedia system: the case of INSPIRE. Proceedings of the User-Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 13(3), 213–267 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Papanikolaou, K.A., Grigoriadou, M.: Modelling and externalising learners’ interaction behaviour. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 52–61 (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peter, G., Katharina, S., Ricarhd, C.: Designing Instructional Examples to Reduce Intrinsic Cognitive Load: Molar versus Modular Presentation of Solution Procedures 32(1-2), 33–58 (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rafaeli, S., Ariel, Y.: Assessing Interactivity in Computer-Mediated Research. In: Joinson, A.N., McKenna, K.Y.A., Postmes, T., Rieps, U.D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology, pp. 71–88. Oxford University Press (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Revelle, G., Zuckerman, O., Druin, A., Bolas, M.: Tangible user interfaces for children. Extended abstract of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, Oregon (2005)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rias, R.M., Zaman, H.B.: Can different types of animation enchance recall and transer of knowledge? A case study on a computer science subject. AJTLHE: ASEAN Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 4(1), 32–43 (2012) ISSN 1985-5826Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Richards, D., Kelaiah, I.: Usability Attributes in Virtual Learning Environment. In: IE 2012, Proceedings of the 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Playing the System, Auckland, New Zealand, July 21-22 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Steinke, M., Huk, T., Floto, C.: Helping teachers develop computer animations for improving learning in science education. In: Crawford, C., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2003, pp. 3022–3025. AACE, Chesapeake (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Terrell, L.P.: History of Interactive Education and Training. The CEO Refresher (2003), http://www.refresher.com/history2.html
  31. 31.
    Triantafillou, E., Pomportsis, A., Demetriadis, S.: The design and the formative evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles. Computers and Education 41, 87–103 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tversky, B., Morrison, J., Betrancourt, M.: Animation: can it facilitate. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 247–262 (2002)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Weber, G., Brusilovsky, P.: ELM-ART: An Adaptive Versatile System for Web-Based Instruction. International Journal of AI in Education 12(4), 351–384 (2001)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Woodcock, A., Burns, J., Mount, S., Newman, R., Gaura, E.: Animating pervasive computing. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication, SIGDOC 2005, pp. 116–122. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Woolf, B.P., Hall, W.: Multimedia Pedagogues: Interactive System for Teaching and Learning. IEEE Computer, Special Issue on Multimedia 28(5), 74–80 (1995)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shang, Y., Shi, H., Chen, S.-S.: An Intelligent Distributed Environment for Active Learning. University of Missouri-Columbia (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nurul Hazra Abdul Salam
    • 1
  • Riaza Mohd Rias
    • 1
  • Wan Kadijah Yusof
    • 1
  • Aisyah Abdul Manap
    • 1
  1. 1.Fakulty of Computer and Mathematical SciencesUniversiti Teknologi MARAShah Alam SelangorMalaysia

Personalised recommendations