Advertisement

Soft Key and Hard Key Mobile Input Devices on Player Experience for Mobile Gaming

  • Kimberly Chu
  • Tek Yong Lim
  • Chee Weng Khong
  • Chui Yin Wong
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8237)

Abstract

Input devices come in different interaction modalities, structure, layout and controls on a mobile platform. However, there is limited information on the types of mobile input devices that affect player experience. Most of the information about the advantages and disadvantages of input devices are reported in isolation without involvement from mobile game application. This paper aims to explore player experience by comparing two different types of mobile input methods, namely hard keypad (HK) and soft keypad (SK), for mobile gaming. Interview was conducted and the results were analysed using content analysis as a way of understanding player experience of input devices for mobile games. The content analysis highlighted positive and negative feedback comprising of two main categories, Features and Effects. Overall, both qualitative and quantitative data collected revealed that HK was better than SK for mobile gaming.

Keywords

input devices player experience mobile games soft key hard key 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Greenstein, J.S.: Pointing Devices. In: Helander, M.G., Landauer, T.K., Prabhu, P. (eds.) Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, North-Holland, Netherlands, pp. 1317–1348 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown, M., Kehoe, A., Kirakowski, J., Pitt, I.: Beyond the Gamepad: HCI and Game Controller Design and Evaluation. In: Evaluating User Experience in Games. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ribbens, W., Poels, Y.: Researching Player Experiences Through the Use of Different Qualitative Methods. In: DiGRA Digital Library-Proceedings 2009, DiGRA, London, pp. 1–10 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nacke, L.: From Playability to a Hierarchical Game Usability Model. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Future Play 2009, Vancouver, BC Canada, pp. 11–12. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Law, E.L.C., Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A.P., Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2009), pp. 719–728. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sweetser, P., Wyeth, P.: GameFlow: A Model for Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games. ACM Computers in Entertainment 3, Article 3A (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bernhaupt, R., Eckschlager, M., Tscheligi, M.: Methods for Evaluating Games – How to Measure Usability and User Experience in Games? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE 2007), Salzburg, Austria, pp. 309–310. ACM Press, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oatley, K., Jenkins, J.M.: Human emotions: Function and dysfunction. Annual Review of Psychology 43, 55–85 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Popper, K.R.: Knowledge and the body-mind problem: In Defence of Interaction. Routledge, Barcelona (1994)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCarthy, J., Wright, P.: Technology as Experience. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Shiratuddin, N., Zaibon, S.B.: Designing User Experience for Mobile Game-Based Learning. In: 2011 i-USEr, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 89–94 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fritsch, T., Ritter, H., Schiller, J.: Mobile Phone Gaming (A Follow Survey of the Mobile Phone Gaming Sector and Its Users). In: Harper, R., Rauterberg, M., Combetto, M. (eds.) ICEC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4161, pp. 292–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holsti, O.R.: Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1969)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hoggan, E., Brewster, S.A., Johnston, J.: Investigating the Effectiveness of Tactile Feedback for Mobile Touchscreens. In: Proc. CHI 2008 of Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1573–1582. ACM Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, New York (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, S., Zhai, S.: The Performance of Touch Screen Soft Buttons. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 309–318. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kimberly Chu
    • 1
  • Tek Yong Lim
    • 2
  • Chee Weng Khong
    • 1
  • Chui Yin Wong
    • 1
  1. 1.Interface Design Department, Faculty of Creative MultimediaMultimedia UniversityCyberjayaMalaysia
  2. 2.Faculty of Computing and InformaticsMultimedia UniversityCyberjayaMalaysia

Personalised recommendations